Posted by: Anonymous Coward
on January 31, 2007 01:51 PM
Agreed. However, when I asked them about the license, they said it would be under the GPL. Even if CNR is useless, I'm still happy to have more free code. I'm sure someone can do something with it.
What I don't like about CNR is that it pretty much gives Linspire the power to override the distro's packaging decisions. This is epically annoying if you believe that certain packages are a security threat, or if you are a free-software supporter. That's why it will be important to replace whatever repo's Linspire has set up with ones supplied exclusively by the distro.
Learn about Linux
Download Linux
Get Linux help
Re:blah blah Linspire
Posted by: Anonymous Coward on January 31, 2007 01:51 PMWhat I don't like about CNR is that it pretty much gives Linspire the power to override the distro's packaging decisions. This is epically annoying if you believe that certain packages are a security threat, or if you are a free-software supporter. That's why it will be important to replace whatever repo's Linspire has set up with ones supplied exclusively by the distro.
#