Posted by: Anonymous Coward
on March 13, 2007 03:24 AM
I'm interested in this discussion but, I don't have the wherewithal to determine who is right. Could you provide some facts and history that might invalidate anything in the original post? So far, the only responses to the post have been name calling. As yet, no one has addressed any specifics regarding the post itself, or the facts therein. This would seem to reinforce the original poster's assertions and makes the name calling look like, well... name calling.
Interesting
Posted by: Anonymous Coward on March 13, 2007 03:24 AM#