Linux.com

Gus3. Most have left this thread now, so we likely have it to ourselves.

Why don't you do your homework and read the full article that was linked to.

In that article you will find a further link to this file:

<a href="http://linuxhelp.150m.com/resources/benchmarks-raw.txt" title="150m.com">http://linuxhelp.150m.com/resources/benchmarks-ra<nobr>w<wbr></nobr> .txt</a 150m.com>

READ IT.

(I mention that the bonnie++ are the raw results, ie, no changes except in formatting.)

Notice the CPU %'s for reiser4 and ext4 are similar.

reiser4 linux-2.6.20-mm1 test 1

cd /
cp -r<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/usr/src/test/linux-*<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/6
REAL:154.98 USER:0.26 SYS:9.84 CPU:6%
cd<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/6;du --max-depth=0;cd /
708421 692:MB
mkdir<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/6/copy2;cd<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/6/copy2
cp -r<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/6/linux-*<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/6/copy2
REAL:84.28 USER:0.24 SYS:13.66 CPU:16%
tar -czf 6.tar.gz linux-*
REAL:84.57 USER:42.21 SYS:11.04 CPU:62%
mkdir<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/6/copy3
tar -xzf 6.tar.gz -C<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/6/copy3
REAL:31.35 USER:6.53 SYS:6.91 CPU:42%
rm -fr<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/6/*
REAL:66.68 USER:0.16 SYS:16.04 CPU:24%
umount<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/dev/sda6

ext4 (extents) linux-2.6.20-mm1 test 1

cd /
cp -r<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/usr/src/test/linux-*<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/6
REAL:162.74 USER:0.22 SYS:9.47 CPU:5%
cd<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/6;du --max-depth=0;cd /
825740 806:MB
mkdir<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/6/copy2;cd<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/6/copy2
cp -r<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/6/linux-*<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/6/copy2
REAL:65.02 USER:0.20 SYS:9.10 CPU:14%
tar -czf 6.tar.gz linux-*
REAL:67.23 USER:42.10 SYS:6.85 CPU:72%
mkdir<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/6/copy3
tar -xzf 6.tar.gz -C<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/6/copy3
REAL:37.49 USER:6.57 SYS:4.96 CPU:30%
rm -fr<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/6/*
REAL:27.47 USER:0.09 SYS:4.43 CPU:16%
cd<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/;umount<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/dev/sda6

Why I bothered I don't know, as you are most likely some perverse propaganda shill.

#