You're not reading the comments in the context of the discussion:
1.) The defendants are taking the mention of "use" and expanding it to include their distribution and modification of the program, which is unquestionably counter to the license.
2.) The point is that it is not "mere aggregation." The EULA is written so as to cover both.
I've made a couple of revisions to make these points clearer.
Re:Article is incorrect
Posted by: nanday on April 04, 2007 02:55 AM1.) The defendants are taking the mention of "use" and expanding it to include their distribution and modification of the program, which is unquestionably counter to the license.
2.) The point is that it is not "mere aggregation." The EULA is written so as to cover both.
I've made a couple of revisions to make these points clearer.
- Bruce Byfield (nanday)
#