Posted by: Anonymous Coward
on April 23, 2007 10:10 AM
btw, Firefox *couldn't* be put in non-free. trademark laws prevent debian (or anyone) from distributing anything called Firefox that doesn't conform to mozilla org's fairly strict trademark licensing rules.
Conforming to the "fairly strict trademark licensing rules" would just sum up to "put it in non-free" as far as I know. So... why do you say it *couldn't* be put in non-free?
Learn about Linux
Download Linux
Get Linux help
Firefox and TM.
Posted by: Anonymous Coward on April 23, 2007 10:10 AMConforming to the "fairly strict trademark licensing rules" would just sum up to "put it in non-free" as far as I know. So... why do you say it *couldn't* be put in non-free?
Are you stupid?
#