Posted by: Anonymous Coward
on May 25, 2007 05:25 AM
Inadequate review. (Neutral)
By Anonymous Reader on 2007.05.24 16:28 (#99454) The review seemed selective, but I'm willing to give the benefit of the doubt. (Having said that, I recently worked for a place that paid the Wall Street Journal to run an "article" for them, so I tend to be more skeptical than I used to be.)
That's complete bullshit. I'm very familiar with the WSJ. The WSJ has never let anyone pay them to run a story.
You certainly don't know the facts. You may have gotten a second-hand or third-hand story, and garbled it completely. You may have confused the WSJ with another publication. But it's clear that you don't know what you're talking about.
Re:Inadequate review.
Posted by: Anonymous Coward on May 25, 2007 05:25 AMThat's complete bullshit. I'm very familiar with the WSJ. The WSJ has never let anyone pay them to run a story.
You certainly don't know the facts. You may have gotten a second-hand or third-hand story, and garbled it completely. You may have confused the WSJ with another publication. But it's clear that you don't know what you're talking about.
#