I'm not trying to convince anyone of anything. I'm trying to remain objective and simply present the facts. I always try to give my readers enough credit for being able to draw their own conclusions. It seems ironic to me that I get bashed for not purposefully leading people to a certain end. I take a lot of care to remain as unbiased as possible in the articles that I write. It's impossible to be completely neutral about anything, but I work at it. It's also always very interesting that when I have been fairly successful at this, is when the largest number of people get angry. That's because both "sides" don't see the bias they would (perhaps subconsciously) like to see.
I suppose I can see the benefit of subjecting the machine to whatever we perceive the conditions to be in whatever country. But there is also benefit in simply pointing out what it is to intelligent readers who can then say, well, doesn't sound to me like it would survive "x". There's actually a demo video on YouTube where they're sitting at a table inside a room that has electricity and the men are dressed in suits. Well, they aren't speaking English, does that make it more credible? <URL:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1knVY3Aca0U/>
Re:Inadequate review.
Posted by: tina on May 25, 2007 06:08 AMI suppose I can see the benefit of subjecting the machine to whatever we perceive the conditions to be in whatever country. But there is also benefit in simply pointing out what it is to intelligent readers who can then say, well, doesn't sound to me like it would survive "x". There's actually a demo video on YouTube where they're sitting at a table inside a room that has electricity and the men are dressed in suits. Well, they aren't speaking English, does that make it more credible?
<URL:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1knVY3Aca0U/>
#