Posted by: Anonymous
[ip: 198.240.213.26]
on August 08, 2007 10:55 AM
"Xming is a better choice than Cygwin/X"
Why? What is better, exactly?
"It [Xming] also has the advantage of more active development -- Cygwin/X hasn't been updated since 2004, according to its homepage."
That's because Cygwin/X is mature and stable. It has a lot of users, and no bugfixes were necessary since 2004. I use it every day. For something like an X server, stability and maturity are more important than anything else. I would advise anyone whose work depended on an X server to go with Cygwin/X. I'm a Unix developer at a big bank, using the development system from a Windows XP desktop, and the employer provides Hummingbird's Exceed X server. But the bank also allows us to use Cygwin if we want, and most of my colleagues use Cygwin/X in preference to Hummingbird Exceed (a commercial product), because it seems to be more stable.
The other stuff that comes with Cygwin is "nice to have".
There are more mature free alternatives
Posted by: Anonymous [ip: 198.240.213.26] on August 08, 2007 10:55 AMWhy? What is better, exactly?
"It [Xming] also has the advantage of more active development -- Cygwin/X hasn't been updated since 2004, according to its homepage."
That's because Cygwin/X is mature and stable. It has a lot of users, and no bugfixes were necessary since 2004. I use it every day. For something like an X server, stability and maturity are more important than anything else. I would advise anyone whose work depended on an X server to go with Cygwin/X. I'm a Unix developer at a big bank, using the development system from a Windows XP desktop, and the employer provides Hummingbird's Exceed X server. But the bank also allows us to use Cygwin if we want, and most of my colleagues use Cygwin/X in preference to Hummingbird Exceed (a commercial product), because it seems to be more stable.
The other stuff that comes with Cygwin is "nice to have".
#