Posted by: Anonymous
[ip: 206.248.172.54]
on September 15, 2007 03:10 AM
If the only news articles ever printed included an explanation as to 'why', we would never see 99% of the news.
In this article, neither Lockheed nor the Corps of Engineers have been forthcoming with a 'why'. What is the writer supposed to do, read their minds? The writer, however, did hint at guess as to 'why' by including the information that this decision comes a year after Lockheed was contracted by the US government to 'help' with the management of IT issues for the Corps.
Re: Non-Informative
Posted by: Anonymous [ip: 206.248.172.54] on September 15, 2007 03:10 AMIn this article, neither Lockheed nor the Corps of Engineers have been forthcoming with a 'why'. What is the writer supposed to do, read their minds? The writer, however, did hint at guess as to 'why' by including the information that this decision comes a year after Lockheed was contracted by the US government to 'help' with the management of IT issues for the Corps.
#