Posted by: Anonymous
[ip: 24.80.34.124]
on September 17, 2007 03:24 PM
I say you infringe on my copyrights in your comment. No judge has yet to rule that I do not own the copyright. You may infringe but since you are unable you will not pursue any copyright infringements.
Why are you disseminating this FUD about Linux copyright. It would be far more factual to point out that SCO is completely lacking in credibility (lying) when they talk of Linux copyright violation and that no one with any credibility has ever accused Linux of copyright violation. If you want to split hairs I've got a fine razor too.:-)
Re: SCO files for bankruptcy - fact check
Posted by: Anonymous [ip: 24.80.34.124] on September 17, 2007 03:24 PMWhy are you disseminating this FUD about Linux copyright. It would be far more factual to point out that SCO is completely lacking in credibility (lying) when they talk of Linux copyright violation and that no one with any credibility has ever accused Linux of copyright violation. If you want to split hairs I've got a fine razor too.:-)
#