Posted by: Anonymous
[ip: 66.66.152.74]
on September 24, 2007 11:28 PM
Publicly funded studies should be, by default, be published to the public. I mean not just the results but, the data as well. So is PRISM a deliberate attempt to conceal information from the public?
While I fully acknowledge the danger of data being analyzed by those that may not have the skills required, it would appear to be equally dangerous to be in a position where results or conclusions are spoon-fed the the general populace.
It makes sense to me to have data out there that can be analyzed by more than one party/organization. Can you say second opinion?
Learn about Linux
Download Linux
Get Linux help
PRISM Coalition lobbies against open access
Posted by: Anonymous [ip: 66.66.152.74] on September 24, 2007 11:28 PMWhile I fully acknowledge the danger of data being analyzed by those that may not have the skills required, it would appear to be equally dangerous to be in a position where results or conclusions are spoon-fed the the general populace.
It makes sense to me to have data out there that can be analyzed by more than one party/organization. Can you say second opinion?
My $.02, openly expressed,
gnulinuxgeek
#