Posted by: Anonymous
[ip: 85.243.25.243]
on October 01, 2007 05:54 PM
Mr. Chen Nan Yang's attempt to make an analogy between philosophy and software engineering fails in a single oblivious point: “Open Source” is a “development methodology” [¹]. Perhaps we should refer to the FREE SOFTWARE philosophy instead: <a href="http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/philosophy.html" title="Philosophy of the GNU Project">http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/philosophy.html</a>
[¹] — <a href="http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-software-for-freedom.html" title="Why “Free Software” is better than “Open Source”">http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-software-for-freedom.html</a>
Taoism of open source
Posted by: Anonymous [ip: 85.243.25.243] on October 01, 2007 05:54 PMMr. Chen Nan Yang's attempt to make an analogy between philosophy and software engineering fails in a single oblivious point: “Open Source” is a “development methodology” [¹]. Perhaps we should refer to the FREE SOFTWARE philosophy instead: <a href="http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/philosophy.html" title="Philosophy of the GNU Project">http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/philosophy.html</a>
[¹] — <a href="http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-software-for-freedom.html" title="Why “Free Software” is better than “Open Source”">http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-software-for-freedom.html</a>
#