Posted by: Anonymous
[ip: 141.123.105.3]
on October 15, 2007 04:07 PM
"Don't even try to bring performance FUD to the table here...."
....because we don't want to hear about problems! You'd think people would get it by now: if there's a lot of people complaining about the performance of Java, perhaps there's a problem with the performance of Java? You can beat your chest all you want that Java's as fast as any other language, but that goes against all of my own personal experience.
Now, feel free to go forward with the stale rhetoric: it takes longer because it has to load the JVM, after that it's fast...or well, then, your developers don't know what they're doing or it would be faster...or, maybe you have an old JVM...or one of the hundred other piles of crap Java devs like to trot out. They're just excuses, people, nothing more. The only people who support Java anymore are Java devs and the moron managers that were suckered into hiring them.
Javalobby calls for Java port to OLPC
Posted by: Anonymous [ip: 141.123.105.3] on October 15, 2007 04:07 PM....because we don't want to hear about problems! You'd think people would get it by now: if there's a lot of people complaining about the performance of Java, perhaps there's a problem with the performance of Java? You can beat your chest all you want that Java's as fast as any other language, but that goes against all of my own personal experience.
Now, feel free to go forward with the stale rhetoric: it takes longer because it has to load the JVM, after that it's fast...or well, then, your developers don't know what they're doing or it would be faster...or, maybe you have an old JVM...or one of the hundred other piles of crap Java devs like to trot out. They're just excuses, people, nothing more. The only people who support Java anymore are Java devs and the moron managers that were suckered into hiring them.
#