Posted by: Anonymous
[ip: 82.226.211.148]
on November 27, 2007 10:06 AM
Well I agree with that opinion, the Ruby language is more expressive than PHP, because it's been designed that way.
For your information, I'm using both languages on a daily basis, and my experience showed me that I could be more productive in ruby, especially because ruby relies on objects, instead of myriads of top-level functions, and blocks, which make it much easier to implement callbacks and iteration.
And, in the context of the article, it's a quote, you know, it's the opinion of Steve Spurgat, it hasn't been stated as a fact by the article's author.
Re: Truthiness in Linux.com articles?
Posted by: Anonymous [ip: 82.226.211.148] on November 27, 2007 10:06 AMFor your information, I'm using both languages on a daily basis, and my experience showed me that I could be more productive in ruby, especially because ruby relies on objects, instead of myriads of top-level functions, and blocks, which make it much easier to implement callbacks and iteration.
And, in the context of the article, it's a quote, you know, it's the opinion of Steve Spurgat, it hasn't been stated as a fact by the article's author.
#