Posted by: Anonymous
[ip: 70.109.163.138]
on January 24, 2008 04:51 AM
That wasn't very helpful now was it? Had you canned the know-it-all and caustic demeanor, you could have answered the question from the original poster with a lot less typing than your entirely content-free post, except of course for the advice that we should all wade through endless blogs about the subjects pets etc.. to maybe stumble upon something of substance. It was, after all, posed as a question, not an accusation or an indictment of M Jepsen. Nor was there even a hint of misogynistic intent within the content of the post except maybe for the fact that he had the unmitigated audacity to question her, a woman. Let's not let the facts get in the way of the discussion or of heaping great vitriol on anyone you've perceived as her detractors. If you indeed have the answers at hand, perhaps you could share it with the rest of the linux.com readers. Maybe too, Lisa could include this and future patent rights issues with respect to the OLPC projects patentable innovations in one of her future articles.
Re: OLPC looks ahead with optimism
Posted by: Anonymous [ip: 70.109.163.138] on January 24, 2008 04:51 AM#