Posted by: Anonymous
[ip: 141.123.223.100]
on June 13, 2008 04:12 PM
*cough* Vista *cough*
Are you suggesting that Vista is less backwards compatible than Wine? Please. Vista's run every single app I've throw at it in the last year or so, and I do a lot of testing for my company. Sure, we're going to hear from some dingus who's using an API that was deprecated years ago complain that it was finally removed in Vista and their tiny little shareware app doesn't work anymore. Boo fucking hoo. Even the crappy software our in house developers write runs on Vista, there's no reason anyone else's shouldn't. It sure runs a hell of a lot more software than Wine ever has. Woo hoo! We can run 4 year old software on Linux now! YAAY! Everybody celebrate!
Finally, it's time for Wine
Posted by: Anonymous [ip: 141.123.223.100] on June 13, 2008 04:12 PMAre you suggesting that Vista is less backwards compatible than Wine? Please. Vista's run every single app I've throw at it in the last year or so, and I do a lot of testing for my company. Sure, we're going to hear from some dingus who's using an API that was deprecated years ago complain that it was finally removed in Vista and their tiny little shareware app doesn't work anymore. Boo fucking hoo. Even the crappy software our in house developers write runs on Vista, there's no reason anyone else's shouldn't. It sure runs a hell of a lot more software than Wine ever has. Woo hoo! We can run 4 year old software on Linux now! YAAY! Everybody celebrate!
#