Posted by: Anonymous
[ip: 66.112.68.151]
on July 19, 2008 12:16 PM
SCO management was never interested in surviving based on performance and features. They bought SCO when they were called Caldera just for the purpose of suing. This is the same reason they bought DR-DOS years ago, then turned around and sued Microsoft for what MS-DOS did to DR-DOS, and won. Once they had the taste of legal blood in their mouth, they had to find more, and Microsoft provided the funds (lawsuit winnings, then behind-the-scene capitol investment, then license purchase) to move ahead.
Re: Is SCO finally dead?
Posted by: Anonymous [ip: 66.112.68.151] on July 19, 2008 12:16 PM#