Posted by: Anonymous
[ip: 77.163.173.87]
on July 28, 2008 01:00 PM
ummm that vista look is default. How can a skinable desktop style be the BIGGEST problem? and to quote someone else roaming the internet : "why is it okay to look like mac OS but not like windows", what defines that it looks like
vista anyway?
I tried 4.0 out, first the polished version of opensuse and then the factory version (dev). Thought it was beautiful to play with, looks very promising, especially all those extra little applications (specially liked the maths ones)! But i'm sticking with 3 until 4 is matured a little. playing with 4 even made me appreciate what the KDE dev team had done with 3, brilliant job!! They have all my confidence that 4.0 will become a masterpiece! just take it easy and ignore the consumer mentality of the masses, the mentality that barks and bites the hand that feeds it's needs, they will hopefully see in the end that that mentality is baseless and greedy.
Re: What went wrong with the KDE 4 release?
Posted by: Anonymous [ip: 77.163.173.87] on July 28, 2008 01:00 PMvista anyway?
I tried 4.0 out, first the polished version of opensuse and then the factory version (dev). Thought it was beautiful to play with, looks very promising, especially all those extra little applications (specially liked the maths ones)! But i'm sticking with 3 until 4 is matured a little. playing with 4 even made me appreciate what the KDE dev team had done with 3, brilliant job!! They have all my confidence that 4.0 will become a masterpiece! just take it easy and ignore the consumer mentality of the masses, the mentality that barks and bites the hand that feeds it's needs, they will hopefully see in the end that that mentality is baseless and greedy.
#