Re: OpenOffice.org 3.0 is an incremental improvement
Posted by: Anonymous
[ip: 129.78.149.91]
on October 16, 2008 02:25 AM
Try that again:
Things OOO does way better than anyone else:
*Format conversion
*PDF export
*Styles (word is awful at this)
*Graph anchoring
*Captions
*Floating frames
Things that should be improved:
*Speed. Its *much* slower than its counterparts
*Size: repo sizes are climbing, almost at a slow exponential. This is tricky, and only of moderate importance, but try doing a source compile -- not fun!
Things that should be considered extremely carefully:
*Linking between documents vs copying data -- too often (in other presentations too) someone brings a presentation via a USB key and references other work on their own computer, which it cant find. need ability to "compile" presentations
Learn about Linux
Download Linux
Get Linux help
Re: OpenOffice.org 3.0 is an incremental improvement
Posted by: Anonymous [ip: 129.78.149.91] on October 16, 2008 02:25 AMThings OOO does way better than anyone else:
*Format conversion
*PDF export
*Styles (word is awful at this)
*Graph anchoring
*Captions
*Floating frames
Things that should be improved:
*Speed. Its *much* slower than its counterparts
*Size: repo sizes are climbing, almost at a slow exponential. This is tricky, and only of moderate importance, but try doing a source compile -- not fun!
Things that should be considered extremely carefully:
*Linking between documents vs copying data -- too often (in other presentations too) someone brings a presentation via a USB key and references other work on their own computer, which it cant find. need ability to "compile" presentations
#