Linux.com

Feature: Internet & WWW

New WordPress 2.2.1 fixes bugs, blocks exploits

By Shirl Kennedy on June 22, 2007 (4:24:35 PM)

Share    Print    Comments   

WordPress yesterday released WordPress 2.2.1, which incorporates a number of small bug fixes and tweaks, along with some security issues that make this a required upgrade.

According to the announcement, this release addresses three vulnerabilities:

WordPress 2.2, released just over a month ago, contained "over 200 bug fixes" as well as several new features, including the ability to integrate Widgets into your blog without installing a plugin. Since then, the WordPress community has repaired a number of other small bugs and refined a few other elements, including Atom feed validation fixes, XML-RPC fixes, Widget backward compatibility fixes, Widget backward compatibility fixes, and Page and Text Widget improvements.

The highly popular WordPress, written in PHP and backed by a MySQL database, is a freely available blogging platform released under the GPL. It was recently chosen as the WebWare 100 winner in the Publishing category.

Shirl Kennedy is the senior editor of the DocuTicker and ResourceShelf weblogs as well as the "Internet Waves" columnist for Information Today. She has been writing about technology since 1992.

Shirl Kennedy is the senior editor of the DocuTicker and ResourceShelf weblogs, as well as the "Internet Waves" columnist for Information Today. She has been writing about technology since 1992.

Share    Print    Comments   

Comments

on New WordPress 2.2.1 fixes bugs, blocks exploits

Note: Comments are owned by the poster. We are not responsible for their content.

Only idiots run WordPress

Posted by: Anonymous [ip: 87.123.119.23] on June 22, 2007 10:25 PM
WP has long surpassed phpBBs and phpNukes security records. It's one of the most misdesigned and dangerous open source applications around. Yet, it's advertised like the plague, because its maintainers don't have to pay for all the worldwide maintenance its exploits have caused. (Not to speak of the LAMP reputation damage).
Then why exactly does this article read "Please upgrade" instead of "Please convert to ..." any of the alternatives? This is an ad, isn't it?

#

This story has been archived. Comments can no longer be posted.



 
Tableless layout Validate XHTML 1.0 Strict Validate CSS Powered by Xaraya