Announced last year, the Creative Archive initiative aims to put the entire archive of BBC material online. The first phase will launch this fall, with about 2,000 factual clips of up to three minutes long, mainly from its natural history archive.
'Logical extension' of public service mission
As a broadcaster funded entirely by public license fees, the BBC sees the building of the Creative Archive as a logical extension of its public service remit. Material in the archive will be based on a licensing model developed by Creative Commons. This would allow material to be downloaded and used for whatever purpose on whatever device, so long as it is not put to commercial use.
Paul Gerhardt, joint director of the Creative Archive, said he hoped "the Creative Archive can establish a model for others to follow, providing material for the new generation of digital creatives and stimulating the growth of the creative culture in the U.K."
The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), a digital rights campaign group, provided written testimony last Saturday before a U.K. government committee evaluating the future role of the BBC.
Cory Doctorow, the EFF's European Affairs coordinator, said the "building of the Creative Archive is a watershed moment in the history of the BBC and of the world. It has the power to strengthen cultural identity of Britons and to lift the world to new heights of creativity, freedom, and cooperation."
In order to reach the broadest range of people and devices, the BBC has also been working for the last couple of years on a video codec for internet streaming called Dirac.
According to the BBC's Research and Development unit, the broadcaster "would like to collaborate with the open source community, academics, and others to produce an open codec. We welcome help and support in creating an open and freely available compression system based on this technology."
Dirac was submitted as a SourceForge project last February, and a 0.4.2 Alpha version was released last week. It is licensed under GPL, LGPL, and the Mozilla Public License.
Cost still a major concern
Cost is a serious issue which the BBC is determined to address. Tim Borer, Dirac project manager, explained, "Ultimately, we would like to support millions of users with streaming services. It is uneconomic to use a codec with a per-user license."
One of the other aspects to the development of an open source approach is the BBC's own public service origins. "We have a different ethos to a commercial company," said Borer. "Open source software development is really a parallel development. It's got the same ethos."
Fergus Cassidy is a technology columnist with The Sunday Tribune and a regular contributor to NewsForge and ITMJ.
Note: Comments are owned by the poster. We are not responsible for their content.
To make maximal use of the material, this might be an exemplary situation in which to use Ogg. Use <A HREF="http://www.vorbis.com/faq.psp" title="vorbis.com">Ogg Vorbis</a vorbis.com> for audio and <A HREF="http://www.theora.org/theorafaq.html" title="theora.org">Ogg Theora</a theora.org> for video. That would prevent getting locked in by any particular vendor or platform.
OK, if I'm going to react about anything, here, this will be it
"already working in the United States?"
Creative Commons is not among the set of things boundable by geopolitical lines.
maybe the BBC's author, there, did not quite understand that.
(and yes, Creative Commons does not include the only members of the set of reasonable licenses, "but hey, they seem to have some sort of a system of<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.. licensing-related<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... things<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... and, 'more than that', they are building something like a brand-name, or<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... a<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... 'community anchor'<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... about it"<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... and yet, not with a Gates or a Balmer behind it, "but with some 'fans', maybe".)
"and hey, we cannot all seek to define<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... er<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... or to explain<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... what 'free' does mean"<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... "so, maybe I'll be careful about picking up the Stallman stick."
trailing off<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... with points<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... and doubts<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... "in a world where 'intellectual property' is perceived of as if it did, actually, exist"
Fantastic!!!
Posted by: Anonymous Coward on September 17, 2004 06:27 PM#