Linux.com

Feature

Hail the Konqueror

By Joe 'Zonker' Brockmeier on September 06, 2006 (8:00:00 AM)

Share    Print    Comments   

Many KDE users tend to take the Konqueror Web browser for granted, but that's a mistake. Konqueror may not be able to replace Firefox as a Web browser for every site, but it does a lot more than just simple browsing.

About 95% of the sites that I visited look and feel exactly the same in Konqueror as they do in Firefox, but a significant number of "Web 2.0" sites do not work or have some missing functionality. On the Netflix site, for example, in Firefox, you'll see an additional information overlay when you hover the mouse over a movie thumbnail, but in Konqueror nothing happens. When using Konqueror with Gmail, you'll be redirected to the plain HTML view of the site -- which is adequate, but not quite as useful as the AJAXified version that works so well in Firefox. The Yahoo! homepage rejects Konqueror, suggesting that you "upgrade" to Internet Explorer, Firefox, or another supported browser, but if you set the browser identification to Firefox, Yahoo!'s home page, Yahoo! Mail, and My Yahoo! pages work just fine.

I've had no luck at all trying to use Konqueror with Google Calendar, Writely, Google Spreadsheets, Google Pages, the TinyMCE editor in WordPress, and a number of other online application sites. That's a hefty list of sites that don't work properly with Konqueror, but it's still only a small fraction of sites that I visit -- the vast majority of sites I've tested work just fine.

Given the number of sites that reject Konqueror, you might get the impression that Konqueror is less than standards-compliant. Actually, the reverse is true -- Konqueror is compliant with most, if not all, Web standards. Unlike Firefox and IE, Konqueror actually passes the Web Standards Project Acid2 test. Unfortunately, standards and actual practice tend to differ, so you may need to keep Firefox handy for a handful of sites.

Konqueror has one other drawback compared to Firefox: It lacks extensions. Konqueror does have extension support, but I've had little luck actually finding extensions for Konqueror. Since the browser isn't as widely used as Firefox, it doesn't seem like much effort is going into producing extensions.

Where Konqueror shines

If Konqueror doesn't handle all of the sites that I visit as well as Firefox, why use it at all? The primary reason is that Konqueror integrates well with the KDE desktop environment, where I spend most of my time. For example, I use Akregator to read RSS and Atom feeds. Konqueror detects feeds on any page that you browse and allows you to set up new subscriptions directly in Akregator. When Akregator reads feeds, it uses the KHTML engine for displaying pages, so you're really using Konqueror (or a piece of it, anyway) to browse inside of Akregator.

Konqueror also works well with KGet, a download manager that allows you to drag and drop links to download files, and amaroK, for listening to music streams. Konqueror uses the KDE Wallet system to store passwords for sites.

Konqueror also has a handy feature for navigating from the keyboard, rather than using the mouse. When browsing, just press the Ctrl key, and Konqueror will pop up yellow squares next to each link on the current page with a number or letter. Instead of having to click the link, just press the associated letter or number on your keyboard to follow that link. This feature is really useful, but not quite perfect -- Konqueror sometimes ignores links, and if a bunch of links are grouped closely together, the squares can overlap to the point where you won't be able to see the letter or number for each link.

Konqueror's tab features are similar to those of Firefox, but Konqueror allows you to detach tabs using the context menu. I'm sure there's probably a Firefox extension that allows this as well, but I like being able to remove a tab from the current Konqueror window.

Tabbed browsing support is great for viewing multiple sites one at a time, but Konqueror kicks it up a notch with split windows. Its window can be split horizontally or vertically (or both), and you can browse different sites in each pane. This is useful if you're composing a blog post and want to refer to someone else's post on the other side, or if you just have a site that you want visible all the time, such as a Nagios window, where you can keep an eye out for any alerts.

My favorite application for the split-screen browsing, though, is being able to drag a link from one pane to the other, so I can follow links from a blog or news site without losing the original page, opening a new window, or popping open a new tab. Note that, thanks to Konqueror's ability to view many file types, this works for PDF files and other documents too. There's something to be said for being able to line up two different documents next to one another, rather than switching back and forth between windows.

Beyond browsing

Konqueror is not just a Web browser, of course -- it's also a file manager, "universal viewer," and more. As a full-featured file manager, it supports thumbnail preview of images, PDF files, and many other file types. It's extremely configurable, and you can perform all sorts of actions on files with just a right-click. Want to email a file to a friend? No problem, just right-click and select "Actions -> Email File" from the context menu. Want to compress a folder into a gzipped tarball, or create a data CD out of a folder? Again, one mouse click and you're on the way.

Konqueror also supports viewing files inline, so you can open PDFs, JPEGs, GIFs, PNGs, and other image files, browse ISO images as a local filesystem, and more. If a filetype isn't supported, Konq usually "knows" how to handle the filetype and will pass the file off to the appropriate handler. For instance, if I browse my mail folder and click on one of the mail files, Konq will pass that off to KMail, where I can view the message. If I click on a log file, Konqueror will pass it off to KWrite.

Konqueror's file handling is, of course, highly configurable. If you don't want to open log files in KWrite, it's easy to edit the file properties and configure Konqueror to open log files in another editor of your choice. One thing I found a bit buggy, or at least a case of KDE's default behavior being unintuitive, is that if you send a file to an application that's already open on another workspace, Konqueror will open the file in the open application without bringing it into focus or giving any sort of notification where the file has been opened. A couple of times I've wondered why Konqueror isn't sending a file to Kate, for instance, and then realized that I was viewing a different workspace than the one where Kate was already open.

The embedded viewer function is particularly handy, though it seems to be a big buggy at times. Trying to view a PowerPoint document using the embedded KPresenter KPart, for example, is a good way to crash Konqueror on my system. Most filetypes work well, though -- I've run into problems only with PowerPoint and very large PDFs.

Konqueror has support for browsing all sorts of protocols, not just FTP, HTTP/HTTPS, and the handful usually supported by Web browsers. By using the fish: prefix, for instance, you can browse another site over SSH, or use sftp: for secure FTP. Want an easy way to copy files from one server to another? Set up a split window in Konqueror, and browse both servers using fish://server , and then drag and drop files from one system to another. The only difference between working with local files and remote files using Konqueror is speed.

Konq also handles virtual filesystems. If you insert an audio CD into the computer and type audiocd:/ into the location bar, you'll be presented with a file view of the CD and potential ripping formats. For instance, when I pop a CD into my computer and browse it with Konqueror, I see a list of all tracks as WAV files, and several subfolders for FLAC, MP3, and Ogg formats. Konqueror will handle ripping the tracks just by copying the folder or files to the desktop. Similarly, you can browse an ISO image and copy files off of it as if you were moving files from a local filesystem.

Want to view your system documentation? Just type man: and the name of a command, and Konq will display a nicely formatted man page for you. This also works with GNU Info pages, if they're installed -- just type info: and the command or utility name. If you don't have the Info page installed, Konqueror will suggest the appropriate man page.

Konqueror also supports browsing Samba/Windows shares, Subversion, WebDAV, and a few others. I only wish it were possible to embed more KDE apps into Konq. I'd love it if I could, for example, embed a Konversation tab within Konqueror so I could browse on one side and keep an eye on a conversation on the other. If you click on a URL that links to an IRC channel, Konqueror will open it within Konversation by default, but it won't embed the chat inside the Konqueror window.

Need quick access to a shell? Konqueror has a built in terminal emulator that opens at the bottom of the Konqueror window. This can be handy if you're doing Web development or making some changes in your Apache configuration. Make changes using the terminal and then view them in the browser right above the terminal.

Basically, Konqueror is a one-stop application for working with all sorts of files over the Internet. Konqueror's not perfect, but it does have a lot to offer for anyone using the KDE desktop. If you're not using Konqueror already, take it for a spin and try some of the advanced features. It really has a lot more to offer than just Web browsing.

Share    Print    Comments   

Comments

on Hail the Konqueror

Note: Comments are owned by the poster. We are not responsible for their content.

Konqueror

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on September 06, 2006 10:56 PM
While it's true that Konq isn't the greatest web browser in the world, for a graphical file manager it's extremely flexible, and very visually appealing as well. One thing I love is the Midnight Commander view...I can drag and drop single files between panes if I want, but use the command line at the bottom for large multi-file operations.

#

One trick ponies

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on September 07, 2006 12:49 AM
"Many KDE users tend to take the Konqueror Web browser for granted, but that's a mistake. Konqueror may not be able to replace Firefox as a Web browser for every site, but it does a lot more than just simple browsing."

So does IE. Uh oh!

#

Re:One trick ponies

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on September 07, 2006 01:09 AM
'So does IE. Uh oh!'

I don't think so.

IE is just able to perform 5% of Konqueror's versatility.

Have you ever heard about ioslaves?

#

Re:One trick ponies

Posted by: EnigmaOne on September 08, 2006 05:27 AM
You need to get your application functions straightened-out.

IE isn't a web browser.
It's simply front-end wrapper code for viruses, worms, spyware and trojans.

#

Konqueror across sessions...

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on September 07, 2006 12:59 PM
Earlier today a reader commented on the inability to restore or open a saved Konqueror session. I could be mistaken (and, I am not yet ready to log off my user, and I don't have enough RAM to tempt crashing my Konqueror session by opening a nested session), but it should be possible to resume browsing where you left off when you close and reopen a Konqueror session. At the very least, use the history window to quickly backstep/trace and reload pages. Make sure to check out and deselect or modify the history settings in "Web Browsing"/"History Sidebar" options in KControl.

But...

Open K-Control

Click on "Components" item

Click on "Session Manager"

On the Session Manager pane, go to the section labeled "On Login"

Click the radio button for the option "Restore manually saved session"

You can see the "Save Session" menu item via the Start Applications button on the kicker.

BTW, I don't don't know why, but tonite via Mandrake 10.1 and Konqueror 3.4.x, the Newsforge site is showing drastically fewer comments on several of the topics where today I saw some 20 in internet exploder on XP. What gives?

David Syes

#

Well...

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on September 07, 2006 09:41 PM
I'd prefer Krusader, but that's just me.

#

Session saver?

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on September 06, 2006 10:58 PM
I would switch from Opera to Konqueror if Konq would have a session saver.

#

Re:Session saver?

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on September 06, 2006 11:01 PM
Word! Or at least a crash-recoverer...
But in Kubuntu, when I reboot, the tabs will still open like they where before the reboot!

#

Re:Session saver?

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on September 07, 2006 02:16 AM
Huh? The crash recover has been there for ages. Tools->Crashes

And on top of that it's one of those plugins that the article author did not think exsist. Because it's not 3rd party and so usefull most distros installs it as default does not make it any less plugin:-)

#

Re:Session saver?

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on April 22, 2007 11:47 AM
??????
When I check Tools there is no crash recovery tool. Am I missing an option setting somewhere?
Norman

#

Re:Session saver?

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on September 07, 2006 12:55 AM
You can. Menu "Configure", item "Configure viewing profiles", name a profile and save it.
Or you can save your current group of tabbed sites at once, and open them at once later (use right-click on the Bookmarks/Favorites menu).

#

Re:Session saver?

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on September 07, 2006 01:48 AM
I simply log out of KDE and leave Konqueror open. And when I come back Konqueror opens the same way I left it. I like this even more than the Session saver extenrion for Firefox.

#

Re:Session saver?

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on September 07, 2006 05:50 AM
Opera does that automatically everytime is closed. Does Konq do the same thing?

#

I've got an idea

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on September 08, 2006 12:16 AM
Just in front of you is a screen. Your mouse will be on the side of the screen associated with your dominant hand. Now, using the same process as you did to run Opera, try Konqueror and find out for yourself. Unless you are not running KDE in which case you won't care.

HTH

#

Re:Session saver?

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on September 07, 2006 02:07 AM
Replace Session with Profile, and Bob's your uncle. It's been supported for ages.

#

Konqui as a browser

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on September 07, 2006 02:59 AM
With my experience with Konqueror as a web browser in Suse Linux 10, Suse Linux 10.1(3.5.1 & 3.5.4) as well as PCLOS(3.5.3), I have seen it to be the worst browser ever. I cannot speak of IE4 and NN2 as I have not browsed that much with them.

When I go into any email site like mail.yahoo.com, it disconnects and brings "Page not found" errors multiple times.

Some ppl. in another forum suggested that it might be a environment variable for IPV6 lookup and asked to make a<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/etc/environment variable to NO. Did that and Konqui became "less crap" from "crap". Still a form of crap.

First I thought the problm was with Suse 10.1 konqui, but PCLos too having the same issue, there is something either terribly bad about the browser
KIO slave(or whatever).

It has been a good file browser and file manager. It has crashed occasionaly in those situations.

Opera, Firefox and Flock are far better and I have stopped using Konqueror as a www browser.

   

#

Re:Konqui as a browser

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on September 07, 2006 09:09 AM
When I go into any email site like mail.yahoo.com, it disconnects and brings "Page not found" errors multiple times.

There must be something very wrong with your configuration. I just tried it under SuSE 10.1, and it works just fine.

#

Re:Konqui as a browser

Posted by: Administrator on September 08, 2006 05:12 AM
> When I go into any email site like mail.yahoo.com,
> it disconnects and brings "Page not found" errors
> multiple times.

Oh! That's the crap-avoidance system. It's a feature, not a bug.

You have yours set to force Konqui to puke on your tennis shoes everytime you attempt to access a crappy, html-based, ad-driven, email 'service' for prawn-swappers.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)

#

Re:Session saver?

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on September 07, 2006 04:09 AM
I just last night found in KDE that that it CAN indeed save sessions. I'd seen it for years and never played with it. I used to lose sessions when Konq would periodically crash on wayward sites.

I'll re-reply tonite to this thread with the steps I took (I'm at work on a winxp machine and I can't remember how I got there...)

IIRC, after I rebooted into another kernel, Konq opened the page I last browsed. Niftily, you can periodically click on the Gear, then click on "Save Session" to manually save sessions. It's in the area where you can choose that Konqueror opens blank, with prev session before a crash, or with the last manually-saved session.

David Syes, posting anon.

#

Re:Session saver?

Posted by: Administrator on September 07, 2006 11:47 AM
Sure, Konqueror has its limitations, but I find that I can actually use it for a rather large subset of the Web browsing that I do, particularly when clicking on a new article I want to read. When I use the Kontact app and use RSS, Konqueror is particularly useful to read news stories. Unlike others, I have been able to use Konqueror with Yahoo! Mail - I guess you just have to treat it right!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)

#

Re:Session saver?

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on November 29, 2006 02:59 AM
Yeah, it would be nice to recover from crashes and still have the same text in my edit boxes. This is the number one feature missing from Konqueror. =/

See <a href="https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=83803" title="kde.org">https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=83803</a kde.org>

#

Browser Identification

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on September 06, 2006 11:01 PM
"On the Netflix site, for example, in Firefox, you'll see an additional information overlay when you hover the mouse over a movie thumbnail, but in Konqueror nothing happens."

If you change your browser identification to Firefox, the Netflix site works just fine.

#

Re:Browser Identification

Posted by: Administrator on September 06, 2006 11:22 PM
"If you change your browser identification to Firefox, the Netflix site works just fine."


Same thing goes for GMail, to get GMail to work fine in Konqueror just set the browser identification of gmail.com, mail.google.com and google.com to Firefox, and most of them will work fine, I havn't tried Google's Spreadsheet or calendar as I don't use them, but GMail and their AJAXy personalized homepage thingy works great.

#

I use Konqueror...

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on September 06, 2006 11:09 PM
...because it is _dramatically_ faster and more memory efficient than Firefox.

And because it integrates perfectly into KDE<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)

#

Re:I use Konqueror...

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on September 07, 2006 10:52 AM
...because it is _dramatically_ faster and more memory efficient than Firefox.



Except for displaying all but the most simple animated GIFs.

#

Well written

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on September 06, 2006 11:18 PM
Thanks for this article. I completely agree, and I think it is important to show that konqueror is not only a handy browser but also an awesome file manager (for me fish:// together with spilt screen is the best invention since sliced bread).

One thing I missed: you could have mentioned that konqueror is really embedded into amarok to view more detailed information about the artists.

So, keep informing the masses about cool stuff<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)

#

Browser Identification

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on September 07, 2006 12:13 AM
Did you know about browser identification? A feature of Konqueror...

Look at the picture, Yahoo works -> <a href="http://server3.pictiger.com/img/519037/other/konq-on-yahoo.png" title="pictiger.com">http://server3.pictiger.com/img/519037/other/konq<nobr>-<wbr></nobr> on-yahoo.png</a pictiger.com><nobr> <wbr></nobr>...if I change the identity to Firefox, let's say for exemple.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)

#

Re:Browser Identification

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on September 07, 2006 12:39 AM
Google Calendar works very well if you change the Browser Identification to Internet Explorer 6 on Windows XP

Look at the picture -> <a href="http://server3.pictiger.com/img/519123/other/.png" title="pictiger.com">http://server3.pictiger.com/img/519123/other/.png</a pictiger.com>

#

emacs-style bloat anyone?

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on September 07, 2006 12:44 AM
I only wish it were possible to embed more KDE apps into Konq.

Have you ever thought about simply using a good window manager? Oh wait. You're using Konqueror as your window manager.

You've already got a program running on your system to do window management! Running a browser, in X, in a window manager, just so you have a nice application to arrange and view all your applications nicely, is incredibly bloated, convoluted, and silly! If you want Konqueror to be your window manager, then get rid of your other window manager so you don't have two running at once, and then just run Konqueror as the last thing in your<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.xinitrc file.

This same sort of thing is the problem with emacs. Well, not a problem with emacs per se, as emacs is still a perfectly fine text editor, but people start up a shell (upon login), then run X, then a desktop environment like KDE, then run a terminal emulator, then run emacs, then use emacs as a desktop environment! Might as well just put<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/usr/bin/emacs as your login shell in<nobr> <wbr></nobr>/etc/passwd and save some cycles! Oh the humanity!

Ok, so I realize that Konqueror is not completely suited to doing everything a window manager does, but the things you laud it for doing, and wish it did more of, are definitely window manager tasks. "Do one thing and do it well" has gone out the window here. If you require advanced-window-manager-type features, then get an advanced window manager. Don't use a browser with some halfway window managerish features tacked onto it.

#

Re:emacs-style bloat anyone?

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on September 07, 2006 01:51 AM
Let me guess, you use Dillo or Lynx.

Maybe we should scrap the GUI altogether and go back to command line only, or even better, who needs a keyboard when you can use punchcards. Yeah!

#

Re:emacs-style bloat anyone?

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on September 07, 2006 09:29 AM
Actually, I use firefox, and occasionally konqueror, or sometimes mozilla. But I do know how to use lynx, for those occasions when X is not working (generally my own fault) or when I'm ssh'd into a remote box and the network X connection is too slow, and I don't want to bother with setting up vnc.

I'm not objecting to the use of excellent technology, which I think konqueror is. However, I am objecting to the misuse of excellent technology, particularly when it comes to the point of having two processes trying to perform the same task simultaneously, and an enormous duplication of effort to write these two applications.

Maybe we should scrap the GUI altogether and go back to command line only, or even better, who needs a keyboard when you can use punchcards.

Spare us. Don't be ridiculous. Punchcards are much much slower to use than a keyboard, as well as being more error prone, more difficult to fix, and generally a PITA. Nor do I think we should scrap the GUI altogether, although I do use the command line for most tasks, as it is immensely easier to do things with once you have gotten over the learning curve.

#

Re:emacs-style bloat anyone?

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on September 07, 2006 02:14 AM
I was thinking something similar, but what window manager allows you to split the screen the way konqueror does withoug having to manage window sizes, but rather uses panes and allows taskbars within panes? While I agree that these are advanced window manger behaviours, I don't know an easy to use window manager that works that way, do you?

#

Re:emacs-style bloat anyone?

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on September 07, 2006 02:53 AM
ratpoison, ion, and their brethren.

#

Re:emacs-style bloat anyone?

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on September 07, 2006 03:38 AM
"but what window manager allows you to split the screen the way konqueror does withoug having to manage window sizes, but rather uses panes and allows taskbars within panes? "

I use several. Take a look at <a href="http://wmii.de/" title="wmii.de">http://wmii.de/</a wmii.de> or <a href="http://home.earthlink.net/~lab1701/larswm/" title="earthlink.net">http://home.earthlink.net/~lab1701/larswm/</a earthlink.net> or <a href="http://www.modeemi.fi/~tuomov/ion/" title="modeemi.fi">http://www.modeemi.fi/~tuomov/ion/</a modeemi.fi>

theoretically, ion3 or even larswm could handle running even the likes of Kickerwith some careful sizing.

Webbrowsers are good for webbrowsing, file managers are good for managing files. Mix the two and you can't help but either compromise features or have useless cruft in the code.

#

Re:emacs-style bloat anyone?

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on September 07, 2006 05:04 AM
in the case of konq though, there's no cruft. it's just utilizing polymorphism. konqueror only has to deal with 1 api, and it gets the services of all the code written to that api (using c++ inheritance of course)

#

Re:emacs-style bloat anyone?

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on September 07, 2006 02:52 AM
it's not bloat, it's the power of object-oriented applications. the embedded pieces are the same shared libraries used by the real applications themselves.

#

Re:emacs-style bloat anyone?

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on September 07, 2006 09:33 AM
And when I run two applications, using an advanced window manager to do the same things as the article describes konqueror doing, the analogs to the "embedded pieces" are the real applications themselves. It is good that the applications are written well enough to be embedded like that. I only hope that they are also well enough written to be used piecewise, as it doesn't do me all that much good to simply be able to embed an entire application in part of another one. If I can embed part of an application in another one, now we're getting somewhere you can't get with just a window manager.

#

Re:emacs-style bloat anyone?

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on September 08, 2006 12:33 AM
I kinda agree. A line must be drawn in between what is embeddable and what isn't. Konqueror is a browser/filemanager, so anything that enables you to move around/view/listen to files --whether these files are local or on a network-- must be allowed to be embedded. When you start to edit/modify files or type something in, that must happen outside of Konqueror. That's the line I draw and the way "my" Konqueror is configured. The only exceptions I do are Konsole --The command line can be faster than the mouse cursor sometimes.-- and I don't allow Konqueror to play any sound because I use XMMS.

If I want several applications on screen at the same time, I use the window manager. I never work in full screen so there's still room to lock other windows in the background or in the foreground if they're small enough.

I wouldn't want Konqueror to look like the (in)famous Kontact which is IMHO the perfect example of embedding pushed beyond its limits. Whatever the way you look at it there's just too much for a single window. I use KMail, KNode, Kopete, etc but I prefer to spread them into several windows, even several desktops.

One thing at a time, the right tool for a given task, that's the way I like KDE.

#

lack of extensions; ajax support

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on September 07, 2006 07:30 AM
great read, as usual joe =)

the primary reason for a lack of konqueror extensions is that they are too hard to write. we have exposed a very powerful c++ api for these plugins so they can do quite a bit, but it's quite a bit harder to get into developing them than it is the javascript extensions for firefox. look for this to be addressed sometime in the kde4 series.

as for ajax support, as some have noted there's a browser user agent problem on the net where sites that push the envelope, and envelope which konqueror can usually handle just fine, try and be "smart" about what content they deliver to which browser<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.. unfortunately they often get it wrong =)

as unity, which is the unfork of khtml between apple, kde and nokia, unfolds for kde4 and brings with it a larger browser base for khtml these issues too will hopefully subside.

several of the google sites have recently started detecting khtml accurately.

aseigo, who can't remember his password (and my account is set to an old email that no longer works<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)

#

Glitches are the same as in Safari

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on September 07, 2006 05:46 PM
For those of you developing WebSites / -Applications, most of the AJAX & CSS glitches you have with Konq. are the same in Apples OS X Browser Safari. (No wonder as both use the KHTML engine).

So if you want to satisfy AppleUsers with your WebWorks, but don't have no OS X handy for testing, try Konqueror.

A lot of times, what works nice in Konq. later works nice in Firefox as well and you only have to hack the standards to satisfy IE...

#

Konquereror strange

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on September 09, 2006 08:56 PM
Is it a web browser?
Is it a file manager?
It is some strange hybrid of a web browser, a file manager and probably some other stuff too.
Which makes the user interface strange, it has so many menus...

#

Re: Konquereror strange

Posted by: Anonymous [ip: 60.49.46.205] on July 24, 2007 10:18 PM
so do MS Internet Explorer.... file browser, web browser and more!

#

Konqueror is awesome!

Posted by: Administrator on September 06, 2006 11:20 PM
Konqueror is my browser of choice, even over Firefox. All I use Firefox for is to update my AdBlock extension, export the definitions to a<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.txt file, and import into Konq. I wish there was an easier way to add the strings for ad blocking in Konq, but I really have no problems with doing it this way.

I have changed my user agent string for my Google home page, but I'm able to use the Google Calendar just fine from Konq with the Firefox ID.

#

Can someone explain Safari and Konq's relationship

Posted by: Administrator on September 11, 2006 12:16 AM
I still don't get how Konq can have things missing from Safari when all the source is there?

#

Hail the Konqueror

Posted by: Anonymous [ip: 81.158.120.24] on October 17, 2007 09:07 PM
Mine stopped.
It has gone into "Off line" mode, and refuses to come out of it.
Nothing in "Help", nothing manual, nothing on web - about kicking it out.
Just a menu option under File / X Off Line Mode, but clearing does nothing.
So I am using Firefox.
colin997carter@btinternet.com

#

This story has been archived. Comments can no longer be posted.



 
Tableless layout Validate XHTML 1.0 Strict Validate CSS Powered by Xaraya