Linux.com

Feature

Microsoft partner points out FOSS opportunity

By Robin "roblimo" Miller on June 03, 2005 (8:00:00 AM)

Share    Print    Comments   

According to a survey released June 1 by Microsoft Certified Partner Port80 Software, 53.8% of all Fortune 1000 company Web sites are powered by Windows and Microsoft's IIS servers, while only 21.2% of these giant companies use Apache and other open source software to run their corporate Web presences. This means these companies offer a huge potential market for FOSS (Free and Open Source Software) vendors and service providers.

Port80 should be commended for reminding us that FOSS is not yet dominant; that there are plenty of companies, including some of the world's largest ones that still haven't converted from expensive, proprietary server operating systems and applications to low-cost, reliable FOSS solutions.

Even better, Port80 gives aggressive FOSS marketers a prospect list, not just raw statistics. Go to its Web Servers survey page, scroll to the bottom, and you see an alphabetical list of the world's biggest companies. Click on any company name and a window will open that shows what Web server that company uses. The ones running Windows and IIS are obviously the best prospects. Go get 'em!

Port80 supplies marketing material, too

At the bottom of the pop-up window used to display a company's Web server, there's an ad for a Port80 product called ServerMask that contains this blurb:

Why let anyone find out you're running a Microsoft IIS server? Don't tempt potential hackers!

If this isn't a tipoff that smart companies should switch from IIS to something more secure -- Apache, for example -- I don't know what is.

Port80 also sells many (proprietary) software products -- see this list -- whose main purpose is to add features to IIS that Apache Server already includes for free.

A long and winding marketing road

Obviously, Fortune 1000 companies aren't under the same cost-cutting and efficiency pressures as smaller companies, so they may not be in a big hurry to improve their Web-serving efficiency and security or cut their Web-oriented costs by switching to FOSS. But sooner or later even the most hidebound accountants and shareholders are bound to ask why BigCorp is using expensive proprietary software instead of the lower-cost alternatives a growing number of their smaller, more nimble competitors have adopted. A smart FOSS marketer will keep his or her name in front of the CIOs and IT managers at Windows-using Fortune 1000 companies so that when the time is ripe, wham! Close that deal!

I'm making that sale sound easier than it is in real life. Typically, the bigger the company, the slower it moves. Convincing a behemoth corporation to use FOSS, even just on its Web servers, may take years of effort, not to mention countless presentations to executives in many departments.

As an example of just how slow some of these companies are when it comes to IT changes, the Port80 survey shows 10.8% of respondents still using the old Netscape Web server.

But even though the sales track may be long and tedious, selling LAMP-based Web services to one of the world's largest corporations can give a significant bottom-line boost to a vendor who pulls it off, even if that vendor is a Fortune 1000 corporation itself, like HP or IBM.

(For smaller vendors and consultants, even a minuscule taste of a small slice of a Fortune 1000 company's Web server pie can be a huge financial coup -- which is no doubt why so many software vendors of both the proprietary and FOSS species spend so much time romancing these potentially gargantuan clients.)

Even a short-stack order could be filling

So far we've concentrated on the Web server section of Port80's survey. Another page details "the Top 1000 Corporations' Application Servers and Scripting Platforms."

Here we see a graph that shows 43.6% using Microsoft ASP.NET or ASP, 12.2% using various Java-based platforms, a mere 5.2% using PHP, and even smaller percentages running ColdFusion, Perl, or Python.

Once again, while Port80 sees Microsoft as a "winner," you can just as easily interpret these results as a marketing opportunity for low-cost, flexible scripting options.

Yes, I know some companies claim Windows and proprietary software beat GNU/Linux and that silly FOSS stuff to death in every way.

But there are plenty of young, aggressive IT managers in Windows-using Fortune 1000 companies who do their own cost, reliability, and security studies -- and are always on the lookout for better/faster/cheaper software tools.

These men and women are great prospects for FOSS conversion. Give them honest facts and figures, "hands on" demos in their own shops, work with their people to overcome training and unfamiliarity issues, and eventually enough of them will come around to put smiles on the faces of a whole lot of FOSS-based vendors and consultants.

Share    Print    Comments   

Comments

on Microsoft partner points out FOSS opportunity

Note: Comments are owned by the poster. We are not responsible for their content.

Google..

Posted by: Rohit on June 04, 2005 04:22 AM
Seems to be apparently using their own web server, most probably called Google Web Server. Here are the headers:




HTTP/1.1 200 OK

Cache-Control: private

Content-Type: text/html

Server: GWS/2.1

Transfer-Encoding: chunked

Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2005 20:20:30 GMT

#

Re:Google..

Posted by: Steve Romej on June 04, 2005 10:29 AM
GWS is a modified version of Apache.

#

Re:Google..

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on June 05, 2005 06:13 AM
Are you sure? I know that is a popular theory, but I have yet to see proof.

#

Re:Google..

Posted by: Steve Romej on June 06, 2005 09:52 AM
That's true; I'm not sure how I'd obtain proof, but it is indeed talked about.

Their custom filesystem, GFS, doesn't appear to be based on any existing technologies so maybe the same is true of GWS.

#

Good point!

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on June 04, 2005 05:14 AM
While some people could see such a study as a blow to FOSS, it is right to see it as an opportunity.

Every solution has a problem, and this study points out the problem.

#

USA only

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on June 04, 2005 10:27 AM

Don't forget the Fortune 1000 is US (0.3B pop, 12T GDP) only. The world (6.4B pop, 56T GDP) has many opportunities too.

#

Re:USA only

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on June 05, 2005 03:39 AM
Excellent point! Many times, we programmers in the USA -- and sometimes other places in the world -- see selling to big companies in the States as the be all and end all of software sales. OSS's biggest opportunity, in my opinion, lies more in developing economies than it does in the USA. Developing nations and small non-US companies can realize the biggest rewards from OSS. Those are the places we, even US programmers, should concentrate on.

#

A couple of thoughts

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on June 06, 2005 06:36 PM

For companies running an insecure web server, I do not think that I would like a page were we are all listed. All this takes is a cracker to go through and use it to take out ALL the ms based web sites.



Has anybody looked through the archives. the ms stuff is going down, not up. Only slight, but still going down. In addition, they do not show surveys for several months at a time that correspond to large drops in IIS according to netcraft. IOWs, their lack of survey was the opposite. They took it and did not like the result.


Most importantly, the apache is taking over the none MS. I am guessing that we will start to see more of the IIS dropping over the next couple fo months.

#

Re:A couple of thoughts

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on June 06, 2005 08:56 PM
If you use the list to check major computer companies, major engineering companies, big banks and companies selling direct to the public. That is anyone who needs a powerfull stable webserver, virtually none of them are using IIS they are all using Apache or SunOne/Netscape.

Speaks for itself the other companies whose websites are there just to preen their corporate face are the ones using IIS

#

This story has been archived. Comments can no longer be posted.



 
Tableless layout Validate XHTML 1.0 Strict Validate CSS Powered by Xaraya