Linux.com

Thanks for your comment. You should see some speed improvement in loading of pages now. We agree with you that the content is the primary aspect of the site. We hope to deliver that content in the best way possible. Thanks again.

[quote=Dean Henrichsmeyer]Thanks for your comment. You should see some speed improvement in loading of pages now. We agree with you that the content is the primary aspect of the site. We hope to deliver that content in the best way possible. Thanks again.[/quote] There was precisely one message in the forum the first time I attempted to reply. At first I did not even realize that new user accounts and passwords were needed, but I couldn't find that out because response in this forum was so awful. What's the deal? Aren't you running this software on Linux servers? If not, why not? Did you mistake how much capacity would be needed to get the job done? Things do seem better and response is improving, but could be better still. I hope you get this right before you lose your readership. That said, the appearance is interesting. As long as the fluff doesn't get in the way of the content and the responsiveness, fine. Otherwise go back to what you had., What was wrong with it that makes this approach superior?

Brian Masinick

[quote=James Buchwald]A lot of this seems to be all right now. The load times actually seem to have improved since the old look, for me - and I'm using a 56k connection. I see nothing wrong with this approach to the site - it's still nice and easy to navigate for me, and now it looks really nice. Good work.[/quote] Yeah, it is several orders of magnitude better than it was around two weeks ago!

Brian Masinick