good distro for a compaq with 633MHz 192MB ram

Forum Index » Forums » Linux Distributions
Author Message
sam
Joined: Mar 11, 2009
Posts: 4
Other Topics
Posted Mar 12, 2009 at 1:22:03 AM
Subject: good distro for a compaq with 633MHz 192MB ram
I want to set up a machine for local file hosting, torrenting, remote desktop, and possibly as a personal webserver. I can use the terminal a bit but I'm not savvy enough to forgo a GUI altogether so thats a must. Also the easier it is to install the better. It seems like there are distros made to compete with windows on the latest hardware which this computer can't handle (ubuntu, fedora, etc) and distros stripped down to run on a waffle iron which are too difficult to use (damn small linux) and nothing in between.
Back to top Profile Email Website

Joined Jul 26, 2008
Posts: 703
Location:

Other Topics
Posted: Mar 12, 2009 1:39:42 AM
http://www.debian.org/______________________________ http://antix.mepis.org/index.php/Main_Page__________________________ http://www.puppylinux.org/downloads/official-releases____________For Puppy download I would Pick either 3.01 or 2.15 because of your ram specs.___________Arrg Crappy forum____________________________________________________________________________ [Modified by: on March 11, 2009 08:40 PM]

Back to top Profile Email Website
Reed
Joined Feb 07, 2008
Posts: 758

Other Topics
Posted: Mar 12, 2009 2:08:31 AM
The newest Puppy will run fine with 192mb RAM. Other options include Zenwalk, Vector, TinyMe, Linux Mint Fluxbox edition, or Crunchbang linux.
Back to top Profile Email Website
sam
Joined Mar 11, 2009
Posts: 4

Other Topics
Posted: Mar 12, 2009 2:49:14 AM
thanks for the help. the linux community amazes me. I mean 8 possible answers is just great. can anyone tell me which of those 8 would probably have the easiest install process? I am a master of messing up an installation.
Back to top Profile Email Website
Reed
Joined Feb 07, 2008
Posts: 758

Other Topics
Posted: Mar 12, 2009 2:23:25 PM
Crunchbang is based on Ubuntu, but uses Openbox and some lighter weight apps, and Mint Fluxbox is based on Linux Mint (which is based on Ubuntu, and, no surprise, uses the Fluxbox window manager, so both of those are probably the easiest to install and use for someone relatively new. Although those are probably the most resource hungry of the lot, as well. They should work fine, but it's up to you to decide if their performance is adequate on your machine. I would see how they run as live CD's. I think Antix is pretty easy to install as well - it's based on SimplyMEPIS (which is Debian based), and it's biggest selling point to me is that it's fully compatible with the smxi scripts (which I love). : http://smxi.org/site/about.htm
Back to top Profile Email Website
sam
Joined Mar 11, 2009
Posts: 4

Other Topics
Posted: Mar 13, 2009 1:32:17 AM
thanks again
Back to top Profile Email Website
fnybny
Joined Aug 05, 2008
Posts: 7

Other Topics
Posted: Mar 15, 2009 8:30:07 PM
i was asking the same question(http://www.linux.com/forums/topic/4930)... lol btw this test might help. i am getting fedora 11 on my comaq presario laptop! [Modified by: fnybny on March 15, 2009 08:32 PM]
Back to top Profile Email Website
sam
Joined Mar 11, 2009
Posts: 4

Other Topics
Posted: Mar 17, 2009 8:53:27 PM
that's not even close to the same question.
Back to top Profile Email Website
Forum Index » Forums » Linux Distributions