MandrakeSoft CEO Jacques Le Marois confirms the news this morning, and company spokeswoman Margaret Waples says, while a contract with Microtel has not been finalized, the company is working on getting Mandrake certified to run like clockwork on the Microtel systems. Waples is hopeful that the dotted line will be signed and PCs up for sale by the end of next week.
Walmart.com and Microtel are getting a lot of press lately, mostly because Walmart.com is the first major retailer to offer something other than the standard Windows PC. With Walmart.com taking the first leap, it's possible that other stores will follow in selling bare systems and those with Linux preloaded.
Walmart.com has a few well-placed electronics buyers who are savvy to Linux, and a management team looking for ways to reinvigorate stagnant computer sales numbers. The combination has resulted in innovations like the Windows-free Microtel line and has generated strong sales and low return numbers, a trend Walmart.com may hope will continue with the introduction of Linux systems. According to sources, the buyers chose Lindows first because of perceived user-friendliness.
But the move to Mandrake may be seen as a better one for the Linux world and for people who want to purchase the Microtel systems with Linux, because Mandrake has been around for years, is already on the brink of a 9.0 release level and has an established reputation for providing support. In support of LindowsOS, however, Rich Hindman of Microtel says that as of Monday, June 17, the version of Lindows that lives in the systems sold through Walmart.com is LindowOS 1.1, not the beta SPX mentioned in a quote from a Lindows PR spokeswoman in Tuesday's report.
A source close to Walmart.com says that Lindows itself is "ready to roll," and that drivers are the only hold up. The Walmart.com units contain special custom drivers written specifically for the Microtel project. "The only way someone can get Lindows 1.1 is to buy a computer with it pre-installed," says Hindman, vice president at Microtel.
There has been some disdain expressed in the Linux community over the perception that Lindows has been reluctant to release source code under the terms of the GPL. Brad Kuhn of the Free Software Foundation expressed some concern that Lindows was going to market at Walmart.com without a fitting EULA. "We have promised [Lindows CEO Michael] Robertson a rewrite of his EULA, and it is waiting for time from our general counsel to write one. We do wish he'd told us in confidence that this Wal-Mart deal was imminent; we could have expedited the work on the EULA if we'd known."
Note: Comments are owned by the poster. We are not responsible for their content.
Tina's done two excellent reviews of Lindows. <A HREF="http://newsforge.com/article.pl?sid=02/04/09/2230251&mode=thread&tid=23">Here's Tina's latest review</a newsforge.com>, and <A HREF="http://newsforge.com/article.pl?sid=02/01/25/1811226&mode=thread&tid=23">here's her first one</a newsforge.com>. --
Grant
Why not simply offer the machines free of OS? So as not to let an open door to accusations of encouraging piracy. It's so easy, it really is. You must only think as a bussinessman.
The Walmart.com units contain special custom drivers written specifically for the Microtel project.
If these drivers are so _special_ that they are proprietary, all is not roses. It'd be roses with a great big land-mine planted in the middle of them.
Proprietary drivers make it difficult (impossible for the casual user) to upgrade or do anything at all independent of the proprietary vendor.
It would be a terrible experience for those who
hope to escape the Microsoft's yoke to find that
Linux puts them in the same bind. An experience
that could sour the Linux market for years.
Sure, "as long as it's standard stuff." Just keep in mind <A HREF="http://www.linuxjournal.com/article.php?sid=6152&mode=thread&order=0">
Use Binary-Only Kernel Modules, Hate Life</a linuxjournal.com>.
If the enterprise customer can't handle proprietary drivers, the consumer certainly can't. The Linux community should be careful. Just because a product is sold as Linux by a major retailer doesn't mean it's _all_ Linux.
The quality of the total package must be evaluated. Should proprietary, binary only, drivers be part of the package a large portion
of what Linux brings to the table is poisoned.
Bad products sold with Linux on the label will hurt rather than help. We need to be _especially_ careful with mass-marketed products.
Just because a machine is sold cheaply, doesn't mean the purchaser is a "casual user". Many people who buy cheaply try to get _more_ out of their equipment, because they have more time than money.
Who's tried Lindows?
Posted by: Anonymous Coward on June 20, 2002 12:22 AM#