Linux.com

Feature

Making the leap: Microsoft Word to OpenOffice.org Writer

By Jem Matzan on April 20, 2005 (8:00:00 AM)

Share    Print    Comments   

Whether you're moving from Windows to GNU/Linux, or just from the proprietary Microsoft Office to the free software OpenOffice.org suite, one of the challenges you'll face is learning how to use OpenOffice.org Writer effectively if you're used to Microsoft Word. In this article I'll show you around OpenOffice.org Writer, where to find familiar Word tools, and how to customize the interface and preferences to make it a little more Word-friendly.

First, don't worry; you won't have much trouble adjusting to OpenOffice.org Writer. The interface isn't terribly different; the menu and toolbar layout are similar to Word's. If you prefer a custom display you'll be much happier with Writer, as it doesn't have a lot of the annoying Word features that people often disable. If the first thing you do when you install Word XP is disable personalized menus and eliminate the superfluous and space-hogging task pane, you'll find it easy and convenient to switch over to Writer.

If, on the other hand, you regularly use the task pane, you're going to have to make some adjustments to work efficiently in Writer. While the task pane does not offer any unique functionality, it does make it more convenient to reach certain tools and commands.

Standard functions and features

The OpenOffice.org Writer menu bar titles are nearly identical to Word's, with the one exception being Word's Table menu. The major functions of Word's Table menu are integrated into the Table dialogue in the Insert menu in Writer.

The button bars of the two products are also similar. One obvious difference is the Writer button bar field called Load URL, which lets you specify a file to open and shows the path and filename of the document you're working on. It's actually quite convenient if you have to load files remotely, but if you want your button bar to more closely resemble Microsoft Word, you'll have to move it over a little. Right-click on an empty space in the OpenOffice.org Writer button bar and then click on Customize from the popup dialogue. You can then modify the button bar by clicking and dragging icons; you can drag an icon out of the button bar to make it go away, or you can drag a new icon from the Customize Toolbars command selection window onto the button bar to add another function, or you can simply rearrange the currently placed buttons. In this case you'll probably want to click and drag the Load URL field over to the right side of the button bar. When you're done, press the OK button in the Customize Toolbars window.

The document view, which is the window in which you edit documents, is not centered on the screen by default in Writer. To change this, go to the View menu, then click on Zoom. In the dialogue that follows, click on Page Width and click OK -- your document is now zoomed in slightly and centered on the screen. You can experiment with different views and zoom levels until you find one that you prefer.

Word XP and 2000 have background spell-checking turned on by default. This function underlines misspelled words in red. OpenOffice.org Writer does not usually have this function turned on by default (default options may vary between versions and distributions). To turn it on, click on the ABC button -- the one with the squiggly red line underneath it -- on the button bar that runs vertically along the left side of the screen.

OpenOffice.org Writer does not have a grammar-checking module built in; that's one Word function that you'll have to live without for now.

Writer usually has the Autocomplete, Autocorrection, and Autoformat functions on by default. These functions complete words, correct various typos and replace special characters, and add indentation and other formatting while you type. If you don't like any or all of these tools, go to the Tools menu, click on Autocorrect/Autoformat, and set the options to your preference.

You may see a separate window already up in OpenOffice.org Writer, on the right side of the screen. This is the Stylist, and it allows you to quickly change formatting styles. If you don't know what those are or how to use them, you'll probably want to close the Stylist window for now to get it out of your way. If you need it later, you can make it reappear by pressing F11 or by clicking on Stylist in the Format menu.

You probably want OpenOffice.org Writer to open your Word documents by default. When you install OpenOffice.org, the installation utility asks you if you want OpenOffice.org Writer to be associated with Word documents -- choose yes for this option.

You can also force Writer to save all of its documents in Word format by default. There are advantages to saving in the OpenOffice.org file format, such as its basis in XML and its better interoperability with other open source word processors. However, if you're primarily going to be exchanging documents with Word users, you'll want to set the default file format to Microsoft's, as Word is unable to read the OpenOffice.org file format. To do so, click on the Tools menu, then on Options. This brings up a window with several categories of customizable choices. Click on the + sign next to the Load/Save category to expand its option tree. Click on the General subcategory. On the right side of the Options window you'll see a heading called Standard File Format. Click on the Always Save As field, then scroll up and select Microsoft Word 97/2000/XP, then click on the OK button.

The rest of the transition from Word to Writer is a matter of finding the same old options and tools in slightly different places in the menu.

Snags

Like Word, OpenOffice.org Writer is programmable through macros, but you can't bring over your old macros from Word to Writer -- they'll have to be reprogrammed.

The dictionary in Writer is slightly less competent than its Word counterpart; you'll have to customize it a little, but it doesn't take more than a few seconds to add an unrecognized word to the custom dictionary.

Writer does not have the extensive watermarking features that Word does. If you need a watermark, you can insert a graphic from the Insert menu, then slect Watermark from the drop-down box in the upper left. Alternatively you can create a partially transparent graphic with a graphics program like the GIMP, then insert it as either a background or as an anchored graphic. To set it as the background, right-click on the white space in your document and click on Page. Select the Background tab, then select As Graphic from the dropdown menu. Choose your preferred orientation and then click OK. If you'd like to simply insert a graphic file, do so from the Insert menu. When you've positioned the graphic where you want it, left-click on it to select it, then right-click on it and choose the Wrap submenu. Select both the In Background and Wrap Through options.

OpenOffice.org Writer has a thesaurus built in, but it's not as easy to get to as Word's is. In Word, you right-click on a word in the document and a popup dialogue comes up with an option to show you synonyms. In Writer, you have to select a word, then click on Thesaurus in the Tools menu. Optionally you can add a Thesaurus button to your button bar by using the procedure outlined above for customizing the button bar.

Extras

If you need a tool to look up words in the dictionary like the one found in Word 2003, you can add a lookup window to your desktop environment. If you're using GNOME, right-click on an empty space in either the top or the bottom panels, then click on Add to Panel. Select Dictionary Lookup from the proceeding dialogue, then click on the Add button. Position the new dictionary field to wherever you prefer it. If you're using KDE, the procedure is similar: right-click on on an empty space in the KDE panel at the bottom of the screen, then click on Add in the popup dialogue. Choose Applet, and select Dictionary. You now have a handy tool for looking up words using Princeton University's WordNet; ultimately you may find this far more convenient and useful than the dictionary feature built into Word.

Need to translate a word or phrase from one language to another? Word XP and 2003 have a very basic translation tool built in, but you can get to the excellent AltaVista Babel Fish translation tool on the Web just as easily, and it has support for many more languages.

Word and Writer have so many features that it's impossible to cover each one in an article. As with any transition from one application to another, you have to spend time finding where each new function is and how to make things look and feel as they did in the old program, but we hope this article gives you a better starting point for switching from Microsoft Word to OpenOffice.org Writer.

Do you have tips and advice for migrating from proprietary software to free software? Write an article of less than 1,500 words telling us how it's done and what to expect. If we publish it, we'll pay you $100.

Share    Print    Comments   

Comments

on Making the leap: Microsoft Word to OpenOffice.org Writer

Note: Comments are owned by the poster. We are not responsible for their content.

Two points

Posted by: daengbo on April 20, 2005 06:30 PM
My version of OpenOffice2 complains on save about the openoffice1 format, even for new documents. I'm not sure why that is, but its' a beta...



Need to translate a word or phrase from one language to another? Word XP and 2003 have a very basic translation tool built in, but you can get to the excellent AltaVista Babel Fish translation tool on the Web just as easily, and it has support for many more languages.

On Linux (or BSD, I guess), I solve this problem by installing dictd and the translation dictionary I need. There are many more than in you distro maintainer's list, so Google for them. For example, I found a<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.deb of the great Thai-Eng-Thai dictionary, Lexitron, in dictd format, and it saves me from loading the full java version of the dictionary all the time. Dicts are available for geography, religions, witty sayings, and acronyms, as well.

#

Built-in PDF creation in OpenOffice.org

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on April 20, 2005 11:11 PM
One nice feature about OO.o, which I just last week needed to use quite a lot, is the built-in ability to generate<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.PDFs. OO.o's<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.PDFs work not only in Acrobat Reader, but in every other PDF reader I've tried (xpdf, kghostview, gpdf, etc.). That means that you don't need Adobe Acrobat at all, including Adobe Distiller; that functionality's already built into the entire office suite. I like this *A LOT*.

One thing I would like to see OO.o make easier to do is the ability, that MS Word also has, to record macros that comprise keystroke sequences. Say you need to delete the first five characters of each line (yes, I know, sed does that stuff very well, but I'm talking about typical Windows/Mac users here). With MS Word, you simply turn on keystroke recording, delete your five characters for one line, and assign that keystroke sequence to a "hot key." Hit that hot key, and all four, six, or ten of those keystrokes are done for you. For really long files, it makes it easy for end-users to simply put the cursor at the first line, hold down that hot key for a minute or however long it takes to get through the file, and it's easy as eating pie.

OpenOffice.org 2.0 Beta can do this, and it does indeed work, but assigning a hotkey to your new macro sequence is more of a pain to do than in MS Word. You've essentially got to go through and act like you're adding a new menu item or a new toolbar icon (I consulted the instructions in OO.o Help for this). I guess once I do it a few times, it'll become second-nature to me, but with MS Word, it was so easy to do this that I didn't need any help to figure out how. Not a show-stopper for me by any means--I still prefer OO.o--but it'd be a "nice to have."

Thanks for the article!

#

How about...

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on April 20, 2005 11:13 PM
a "Making the leap: Word processing to Lyx"?

#

Comments in Writer?

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on April 21, 2005 01:08 AM
I'd consider moving if Writer has a decent commenting and revision management...

#

only if you can turn it off and keep it off

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on April 21, 2005 02:49 AM
Sure, a comments and a revision system similar to the "reviewing toolbar" and "track changes" in MS Office is OK I suppose. As long as I can toggle the bloody thing OFF and keep it OFF forever, even when I open a document created by someone else.

Our company "upgraded" me to Office XP. Now it is my number one annoyance. If only I could find the resource file for the reviewing toolbar or a registry setting. I'd even delete the toolbar's resource file and refuse to do a "detect and repair" if possible.

Lucky for me I found out how to stop MS Word from auto-importing other people's styles and creating a million new ones with every formatting change. And I've found out how to kill the stupid paperclip, auto-grammer and auto-formatting, and auto-spellcheck.

And...well, I hate MS Office. It is crap. Unfortunately OpenOffice seems to be emulating a lot of the crap. How do I turn off the stupid lightbulb thingy forever?

#

Re:only if you can turn it off and keep it off

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on April 21, 2005 08:41 PM
Go to the Help menu and uncheck "Help Agent".

#

Thank you

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on April 22, 2005 01:22 AM
I guess my previous thank you post didn't make it...

Anyway, I had tried right-clicking on the light bulb and looking in the tools menu. I didn't think that its setting options would be in the help menu instead of where all the other settings are. Thanks again.

#

Re:Thank you

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on April 27, 2005 07:36 PM
actually tools->options->openoffice.org->general
has an option that will allow you to do this through the usual interface<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:) (remove tick mark in the help agent section)

#

Re:Comments in Writer?

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on April 21, 2005 06:18 AM
there is, in fact, such a function. Place the cursor at any point in the document then, under the "Insert" menu, select "Note" a dialog box will appear where you can type in your "comment". a small yellow box will be placed on your document which you can hover on with your mouse to get a pop-up tipbox of the comment; or double click to edit the comment. admittedly, though, it is not as aesthetic as the right-margin "comments" on word. for example, the small yellow box cannot be resized which can sometimes be annoying when one is scrolling through a document looking precisely for comments.

#

Re:Comments in Writer?

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on April 22, 2005 07:50 PM
If you're specifically looking for notes in a document (or images, tables, bookmarks, etc.) then you need to take a look at OOo's navigation features.

First there's the Navigator. Usually the button next to that for the Stylist, or "F5" to toggle it on and off by default. Ensure that the list box is showing (if you're only seeing a small dialogue, find and click the "List Box on/off" button in the dialogue). Now you should see a list entry for notes which you can expand to show the text of each note in the document. Double click an entry to jump to it in the document.

If you just want to step through each of the notes in the document, then try using the three buttons at the bottom of the vertical scrollbar. The middle button (usually with a round nodule on it) changes what type of item the other buttons will navigate to. So click the middle button and select the "Note" option. Now the other two buttons will step between the next and previous notes in the document.

#

spell checker sucks ass in OO.org

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on April 21, 2005 02:46 AM
adding new words doesn't help the fact that it rarely ever finds corrections for misspelled words.

and if someone wants to reply to say i can't spell, well duhh. so let me put it another way... ms word is 1000% better at finding corrections. go it?

#

Re:spell checker sucks ass in OO.org

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on April 21, 2005 05:31 AM
You might consider trying to learn how to spell. A spell check is no replacement for knowledge.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-)

Incidentally, I am very hapy with the OOo spell check. I find it quite capable.

Cheers,
Daniel.

#

Re:spell checker sucks ass in OO.org

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on April 21, 2005 02:37 PM
You are overrating the spelling checker in MSWord. I'm in the publishing industry and have been getting lots of documents done in Word with misspelled words. The people sending them swear they used the spelling checker. I use OpenOffice.org Writer, and it checks the spelling correctly. However, I didn't switch because of the spelling issues. MSWord doesn't hold its pagination in complex documents, inline graphics (even anchored ones) move around when opened on different machines (even ones with the exact same release of MSWord installed), and a whole slew of other problems make MSWord quite possibly the very worst word processing software on the market today.

#

Re:spell checker sucks ass in OO.org

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on April 21, 2005 10:39 PM

go it?


That's not just misspelled. It's grammatically nonsensical. You should focus more on learning to use the language than on how to use Spell Check effectively.

#

Re:spell checker sucks ass in OO.org

Posted by: steeren on April 28, 2005 10:20 PM
You should really learn to only make comments in areas where your actually know what your talking about. Not to be nasty or anything, but making comments like that simply indicates you are not a competent user of writter.
I wouldn't be disheartened by this, I'm sure you'll pick it up, its not that hard. Not every one can just use a word processor straight away, it takes some people time. Just take one day at a time, tell yourself you can do this (maybe learning to spell will take the presure off your challange), but even still, be calm and confident in your own abilities to break through this apparent barrier - keep telling yourself, yes! I can do this, I can figure out how to use the spell checker, and one day it will happen for you - kinda like whistling, it just comes!

#

Re:spell checker sucks ass in OO.org

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on June 01, 2005 03:27 PM
"your" = belonging to you ("your cat")
"you're" = you are ("what you're talking about")

Unfortunately, a spellchecker alone won't catch that kind of oversight.

#

spell-checking, hyphenation

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on April 21, 2005 05:44 AM
I hope I spelled the words in my subject correctly. Open Office is great free software, but I have to spell-check my documents with an another wordprocessor, as the OO is not capable of proofreading most of the languages its most important competitor is. The same is true with for example LyX...

#

Re:spell-checking, hyphenation

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on April 22, 2005 12:13 AM
Are you on Windows? Maybe this is true there. However, on Linux, I set up Aspell the way I wanted it, in the various languages I needed spelling checks for (many more of which are available on Linux than on Windows), and both LyX and OpenOffice.org Writer (as well as all my other Linux applications) use it when I do a spelling check. The whole thing works a lot better than the redundancy in Windows of expecting each word processing program to provide its own spelling checkers or adding to the bloat by keeping a 3rd-party spelling checker in TSR.

#

Re:spell-checking, hyphenation

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on May 03, 2005 01:56 AM
OOo is provided with English dictionaries. If you want to check other languages, try the marvelous DicOOo autodownload and autoinstall tool - in a few clicks you can spellcheck dozens of languages! don't install too many though, or you'll get a huge hit on performance...

#

Easier dictionary

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on April 21, 2005 08:17 PM
The author points out correctly that adding a little applet on the Gnome or KDE taskbar is more powerful than the OOo's dictionary.

Even better IMHO is a little command-line app called eDictionary. http://edictionary.sourceforge.net/

From the command line, just type 'edict [word]' for definitions or 'ethes [word]' for use of the thesaurus. Great little app, no overhead, quick.

Just my $0.02.

#

Re:Easier dictionary

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on May 05, 2005 01:45 PM
It comes back to the age old bebate of small tools with well defined interfaces which have many and varied application (Linux/Unix Style) vs bloated "feature-rich" bug-ridden megaliths with almost work most of the time (Windoze style). OO may not have decided which camp it belongs to but it is tending towards the second. If you like the first style then you'd be using Lyx.

#

Don't use Word if you are an SME

Posted by: The Tekmerc on April 21, 2005 11:07 PM
Well you might want to switch to Openoffice if you are a small or medium sized business because if you get hit by a 0-day bug in a Microsoft piece of software then they want you to pay them for a support contract just so they can fix the bug rather than fixing it for free like they would in an open source piece of software. So if you get caught out, like one of my clients, they expect you to pay for the software then lose money through lost productivity and then you have to pay them to fix a problem in their software. And before anyone says the usual of have you applied all the updates, all of the XP and office updates have been applied and they dont make any difference.

#

Re:Don't use Word if you are an SME

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on April 27, 2005 02:43 AM
There is no logic: I were running a business I would prefer paid support to no support at all.

I'm not to defend MS, but guaranted support is defenitely week point in Open Source projects. The support is not guaranted though it *may* be exceptionally high if provided.

PS. I'm OSS developer.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)

#

Re:Don't use Word if you are an SME

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on April 27, 2005 09:53 PM
And where is your guarantee to fix from MS? Thats right it does not exist. You can pay them the $245 and then go round and round with their "tech support" but they guarentee you nothing. In fact there is a lot of stuff they "will not" fix. All they will do if they can't or "won't' fix it is refund the $245 to your charge card.

#

Re:Don't use Word if you are an SME

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on May 01, 2005 08:38 AM
The support isn't provided by the project - sure, they provide knowledgebases, forums and mailing lists, but the actual "on site" support would be provided by someone else, whether that be the business' internal IT department, or a support arrangement with a third party.

Of course there is a cost to this, but there is also a saving to not paying for all those Office and Adobe Acrobat licenses.

#

This story has been archived. Comments can no longer be posted.



 
Tableless layout Validate XHTML 1.0 Strict Validate CSS Powered by Xaraya