Linux.com

Feature: Linux

Review: Xandros Desktop OS 4.1 Professional

By Joe 'Zonker' Brockmeier on December 19, 2006 (8:00:00 AM)

Share    Print    Comments   

A few weeks ago, Xandros released an update of its Business Desktop OS with a number of new features, including 3-D effects and desktop search. The 3-D effects fell flat in my tests, but I found the distro to be a pretty good OS if you're looking for a Windows replacement.

One of the things Xandros has always gotten right is its simple installation routine. If you pick the express install, all it requires is a few mouse clicks and you're done before you know it. The custom install is not much more difficult. Some users might find the limited options for disk partitioning and management to be a bit frustrating, but users who want to set up a RAID or use LVM probably aren't Xandros' target market for the desktop system. The custom install allows you to modify the default Xandros package selection, handle custom partitioning and choosing a different filesystem (Xandros uses ReiserFS by default), and allows you to set up the network configuration manually.

I tried Xandros on a couple of systems. One was a Shuttle XPC with an Athlon X2 4200+, 4GB of RAM, an Nvidia 7900 video card, and Realtek onboard audio; the other was a Pentium 4 laptop with 1GB of RAM, an ATI Radeon 250, Intel sound card, and Intersil Prism wireless.

Xandros did just fine on both machines. It detected all of the peripherals and devices on my systems with no problems, and configured most of them appropriately. The one spot where Xandros didn't do "the right thing" was with the network configuration on my laptop. Despite the fact that I had no Ethernet cable plugged into the laptop's onboard NIC, and that Xandros detected the wireless card correctly, it didn't try setting up the network using wireless. I had to configure that manually after the install had finished.

Xandros Security Suite

When it comes to anti-virus applications for Linux, color me skeptical. The need for desktop AV under Linux today is minimal at best. But vendors like Xandros are trying to woo users and organizations away from Windows, and Windows users have been trained to look for anti-virus applications on their desktop. Without the anti-virus app giving the thumbs-up, many users are going to feel nervous about a system, and wonder what sort of nasty malware may be lurking on it.

Xandros Security Suite
Xandros Security Suite - click to view

Xandros ships its Desktop OS with the Xandros Security Suite, which consists of Xandros Anti-Virus, a firewall configuration app, a rootkit checker, and the Xandros Networks updater. I understand why Xandros is shipping the security suite, but I don't understand why Xandros chose to set it up in such an intrusive manner. The security suite is like an annoying younger sibling in the corner of the desktop, always demanding attention.

As soon as the system is installed and the user logs in for the first time, the user is presented with a flashing shield in the system tray. To get the shield to stop blinking, the user must manually configure the security suite to perform the checks Xandros deems necessary to keep the system "safe" at the required intervals -- or to configure the suite to ignore the "problems."

Providing the security suite for the user's piece of mind makes sense, but why not set it up to have the "safe" settings by default and skip annoying the user? Even after it was configured to the "safe" settings, the software would occasionally pop up a dialog just to let you know it was still there. Maybe Windows users have a higher tolerance for random flashy things on their desktops, but I prefer that applications stay out of my way unless there's a good reason to grab my attention.

The firewall configurator, on the other hand, is nicely done. Xandros makes configuring the firewall a simple matter of walking through two dialogs and selecting the incoming and outgoing services that should be allowed. Xandros should relabel the Firewall Control button, though -- I was expecting this to allow additional tweaking of firewall rules, but instead the "control" is just a dialog that asks whether you want to turn the firewall off or on.

Video effects?

This release of Xandros Desktop includes the increasingly popular "bling" that you've heard so much about. At least, it does if you have the required hardware and it doesn't freeze up on you. On the two systems I tested, Xandros was unable to muster any bling to brag about.

On the desktop system with the Nvidia 7900 card, Xandros detected the video card and installed the proprietary Nvidia drivers. However, when I tried to enable desktop effects for the system, the configuration wizard told me that the system wasn't supported for desktop effects.

On the laptop, which I've used Compiz with successfully in the past, the configuration wizard indicated that my video card did support 3-D effects. After clicking enable, it asked me to restart my computer for the change to take effect. After doing so, the login screen came up OK, so I thought I was on my way to wobbly windows and a cubed virtual desktop. Actually, I was only in for a locked-up desktop as soon as I logged in.

I restarted the system a few times to be absolutely sure, but Xandros locked up tighter than a drum each time I logged in. After the final try, I rebooted the system again and used the Xandros Safe Video mode to disable 3-D effects so I could at least return to the boring old 2-D desktop.

The Xandros desktop

The Xandros desktop is based on KDE, but configured to look much like Windows. The default packages are primarily KDE/Qt applications, but Xandros does throw in a few choice GNOME/Gtk applications as well. For example, Evolution is included for users who want a mail client and groupware suite that looks like Outlook.

Xandros running Word and IE6 with CrossOver
Xandros running Word and IE6 with CrossOver - click to view

Xandros has done a good job of picking just one application for each task, so that new Linux users won't be overwhelmed by a gob of browsers, music players, and so forth. Oddly, Xandros did choose to ship two mail clients, though -- KMail and Evolution are both installed by default.

Overall, the default selection of packages is decent -- though I might quibble with some of the selections that Xandros made. For instance, the company chose to ship Kopete for IM rather than Gaim. While I don't have anything against Kopete, I think Gaim is a better application for Linux newbies.

A couple of applications are left out of the mix that I'd expect to see in any Linux desktop OS, specifically the GIMP and OpenOffice.org. Neither package is installed by default, though you can grab them through Xandros Networks, Xandros' package management utility and repository.

Well, you can grab them if the repository happens to be online, anyway. I tried downloading OpenOffice.org and the GIMP on a weekday morning and got a note saying that the Xandros Network archive "is being refreshed" and to "please check back in a moment." Hours later, I was able to complete the download.

The new release also integrates Beagle search into the Xandros desktop. Beagle indexes office documents, Web pages, IM conversations, and more, and makes it easy to find anything that contains the keywords you're looking for. Other distros have been shipping Beagle for a while, so it's not particularly revolutionary to find it in Xandros, but it is a nice addition. Beagle also seems to be fairly well optimized; I didn't notice any performance hit from Beagle indexing my documents on the test systems.

If you must run Microsoft Office ...

Xandros also includes CrossOver Office, which allows you to run some Windows applications under Linux. I don't have a lot of Windows software lying around these days, but I did install a few apps to try it out. I installed Internet Explorer 6 and Microsoft Office 2003 under CrossOver, and it was almost as easy as installing the applications under Windows itself. (I say "almost" only because there are a few additional dialogs to contend with, as CrossOver asks a few questions about the process.)

Once installed, Office was set to open Office documents automatically, and I'm guessing that the average Windows/Office user would see little difference between using Office on Windows and Office on Xandros. IE6 also worked well, though it did have some weird refresh issues when running on a Xandros virtual machine under VMware Workstation. That might be more of a VMware side effect than a Xandros/CrossOver issue, though. If you're hoping to run IE7, it may be a while before you can do so -- a quick look at the CrossOver Web site indicates that IE7 isn't yet supported.

Overall, Xandros is a fine desktop operating system, and well suited for Windows refugees and the business environment -- particularly one where Microsoft Office is still a requirement. The price tag, $99 for download or boxed set, is a bit steep in a market where there are so many good free Linux distros, but the inclusion of CrossOver Office and security tools may make the cost worthwhile to businesses.

The desktop effects don't seem to be ready for prime time yet, and Xandros needs to take the security suite down a notch so it's not so annoying, but otherwise this distribution is worth trying out if you're looking for a Linux desktop to see you through Windows withdrawal.

Share    Print    Comments   

Comments

on Review: Xandros Desktop OS 4.1 Professional

Note: Comments are owned by the poster. We are not responsible for their content.

Two comments

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on December 19, 2006 08:22 PM
"IE6 also worked well, though it did have some weird refresh issues when running on a Xandros virtual machine under VMware Workstation. That might be more of a VMware side effect than a Xandros/CrossOver issue, though."

I have odd refresh issues with WINE on Ubuntu; on the other hand, I've never seen refresh problems with VMWare - so perhaps this is not related to virtualization. Was Xandros tested outside of VMWare?

"If you're hoping to run IE7, it may be a while before you can do so -- a quick look at the CrossOver Web site indicates that IE7 isn't yet supported."

IE7 will probably never be supported, since Microsoft only let it install if a computer passes WGA, to my knowledge. I doubt that WINE/Crossover will ever pass WGA, if that is even legal and not a DMCA violation in some weird way.

#

Re:Two comments - virtualization

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on December 20, 2006 01:16 AM
I'm guessing the refresh hickup is not due to virtualization. More likely it's running non-native software through the WINE and Crossover "workaround" emulators where Microsoft has no interest in Wine/Crossover compatiablity (Picasa runs great though a little laggy).

I've had no trouble with VM win98 or winXP installs fully patched including the forced IE7 upgrade.

VMware also presented no noticable performance hit, the only issue has been the few win32 only activities that require direct hardware access such as gaming and USB hardware support issues; for Games, your booting to win32 else everything should be fine under a VM.

I did notice that a VM running under VMware installed under Windows runs with noticable lag compared to that same VM (used the same folder on a fat32 partition to be specific) under VMware installed undaer Linux distro. That's a pretty Windows vs performance Linux thing though so it's expected.

#

Xandros Security Suite

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on December 19, 2006 11:30 PM
I guess Xandros Security Suite could use some user interface improvements.

By the way, Wikipedia has an article about Xandros;
* <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xandros" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xandros</a wikipedia.org>

#

Does Xandros play well with others.

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on December 20, 2006 04:27 AM
One thing most Xandros reviewers seem to skip is how well Xandros integrates with Windows networks. Sure, it seems like a decent desktop on its own, but how hard is it to plug into a Windows domain?

I'd very much like to run Linux at work, but until I can join our network with a few mouse clicks and interact with the Exchange server, my boss isn't going to be interested.

#

Calm down, cheapskate

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on December 20, 2006 11:59 AM
If it uses software released under the GPL, it must be made available to the public. It's a linux distribution, which of course, uses the linux kernel (and tons of other software) which is all licensed under the GPL, so there is a 'free' (as in cheapskate) source for it somewhere.

The $99 pricetag includes some sort of service, whether it be telephone support or network access to automated patches, et cetera.

#

3D Problems

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on December 20, 2006 01:12 PM
I ran into the same issue with the 3D desktop enabled. However I found that if you start the system in safe mode and then restart the X server, using CNTRL-ALT-Backspace, it will then start back up in the 3D desktop with no problems.

#

Re:Pay for Xandros?

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on December 20, 2006 09:30 PM
Well you thought wrong. You clearly have no clue of how things work.

The "paying part" only covers the services and support Xandros provides.

Free as in liberty. Not necessarily free as in price. The choice is up to you, if you want paid support/services. IF you don't, its not gonna cost you a dime.

#

Re:Pay for Xandros?

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on December 21, 2006 09:41 PM
This is perfectly acceptable under the GPL, and is the beauty of FOSS. Read the GPL sometime - you'll see why there are both for pay, and for free GNU/Linux distributions. I'm not going to ever be a Xandros customer simply because I don't need a distro to hold my hand, nor do I need any sort of Windows support, but for some this may be a good solution.

#

Re:Pay for Xandros?

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on March 27, 2007 07:32 AM
I don't think the "Linux license terms" (Gnu/GPL) is very clear on that point.
<a href="http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#DoesTheGPLRequireAvailabilityToPublic" title="gnu.org">http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#DoesTheG<nobr>P<wbr></nobr> LRequireAvailabilityToPublic</a gnu.org>

Given the number of changes and additions to the basic code, only the originally used (copied) code need to be GPL'ed. Any code developed by a company in addition to original GPL code seems not to be needed to be released under GPL. But how can you isolate a few lines of code embedded in old GPL?

In the terms I don't see a term requiring making a free download of the distro available. I see the source should be made available, but this could be on individual request or in print and perhaps for a fee. What I do see is that anyone who in any way obtains the GPL distro may distribute it for free.
Hence the company gives up and makes a download available for good PR. (Does Lindows ring a bell?)

When a company adds proprietary functionality, I don't see a requirement for GPL'ing that. However as there is a lot of GPL code in Xandros, I believe GPL does not touch on having to release the entire Xandros Home as GPL, - just the original GPL. But you can't partly release an integrated package like Xandros Home as GPL. So I expect Xandros tries to save the day by releasing an open Xandros without commercial licenses like MP3, but opts to GPL Xandros own additional code, even thohugh not needed and hoping this is accepted by the community.

So as I see it GPL is a total and hopeless mess opening for all kinds of lawsuits with no clearcut truth.

I would want to see Xandros use the BSD license. I don't see the need for Xandros to be based on Linux. Xandros could build their additional code on top of FreeBSD and KDE apparently with no free distribution requirement.

If anyone can find the KDE license on <a href="http://www.kde.org/" title="kde.org">http://www.kde.org/</a kde.org> please let me know. I don't see it, using 5 min.

How could Xandros KDE be non-free closed source? Perhaps by this:
"Qt, to which native graphical KDE applications link for their graphical widgets, is free software, licensed under the GNU GPL and QPL licenses (a license for developing proprietary software may be purchased however)" (Wikipedia)

I think BSD is the smarter license helping both private and corporate: Anyone can take the basic free BSD fork and build their own 'OS' on top without GPL and thus getting paid for working. The free original BSD is still there for any person to get for free. But they can't get the improved OS for free. The difference is that no-one has a claim to use other peoples work for free.

I think any company building an OS on the silly 'Linux' Gnu/GPL license is irresponsible when they could do it via BSD and above said KDE option.

However I don't have any deep insight in Gnu/GPL and court interprertations and decisions, while the dozen lines or so in BSD is easier to comprehend.

So Xandros should trash the Linux OS and rebuild on FreeBSD and make it fee-based only.

#

Re:Pay for Xandros?

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on April 20, 2007 04:37 AM
This is a misconception caused by the generally accepted use of the word "free" in our language.

The Free Software Foundation the group that started this whole issue did not mean "free" in the generally accepted way it is used in our language. Here is a link that defines what they mean by "free" <a href="http://www.fsf.org/licensing/essays/free-sw.html" title="fsf.org">http://www.fsf.org/licensing/essays/free-sw.html</a fsf.org>.

Anytime it takes that much to define a word then maybe another word should have been used. Oh well, it is too late now.

#

Re:Missed one of Xandros' greatest strengths

Posted by: Administrator on December 21, 2006 12:04 PM
Yes, probably the two greatest strengths of Xandros are its simplicity and its Windows interoperability.

I rate Xandros #1 in the entire industry for Windows compatibility. I cannot think of anything other than another version of Windows that can interoperate or work in a compatible fashion, either on the same computer or on the same network with Xandros, particular the business edition.

Xandros is in a near tie with a small handful of other distributions when it comes to simplicity and cleanliness of installation. In terms of just the installation itself, SUSE and Xandros are two of the easiest full distributions to install, but Freespire and SimplyMEPIS are equally easy to install and they serve a similar desktop target audience.

SUSE and Xandros offer a couple of other advantages over their top desktop competition:

1. Much better than average printed and online documentation. Red Hat and Mandriva are good at this, too, but Xandros and Novell's SLED stand head above the rest when you combine documentation, simple installation, clean desktop design, and support together.

For me, since I don't need all of that, I like SimplyMEPIS for my own use. But Xandros wins, hands down on Windows interoperability, is either best or close to best in a number of other categories pertaining to usability factors that potential converts would be looking at.

Some would argue with the importance of these factors, but I put Xandros in the top two as most likely desktop system to be used by converts in business. The home edition gets a similar rank for shrink wrapped packages.

The business version is definitely worth it, particularly coupled with a solid support package. One might argue the relative worth of the home based edition, simply because there are many free versions that provide very nearly the same experience. I would argue that if you want that Windows interoperability at home, Xandros is still a top candidate. If you don't need that, then it is still very nice, but perhaps more questionable in value, considering the other very inexpensive (and even free) options available, eg. Freespire and SimplyMEPIS in particular).

I don't put Fedora Core or Red Hat Enterprise Linux in the same league for desktop use. Fedora Core is a great distro, but it has geek written all over it (I am a geek, but I do not rate it highly for consumers). Red Hat Enterprise Linux has great server software but ranks relatively low on my totem pole as a desktop system in any capacity - its redeeming strengths are documentation and support.

#

Missed one of Xandros' greatest strengths

Posted by: Administrator on December 19, 2006 10:41 PM
I can't believe the reviewer didn't mention one of Xandros' greatest strengths, its almost seemless integration with Windows networks. Xandros was the first distro that I used at work because it integrated with our AD servers far better than any other distro I tried (and this was version 3). The setup is simple and straightforward. It's perfect for anybody trying to run Linux in a Windows world.

#

Pay for Xandros?

Posted by: Administrator on December 20, 2006 09:22 AM
Hmmmm....I thought anyone was able to download and use linux distros for free? So aren't these corporations or organizations breaking the rules? They shouldn't be able to use the linux name if it's not for free.

#

This story has been archived. Comments can no longer be posted.



 
Tableless layout Validate XHTML 1.0 Strict Validate CSS Powered by Xaraya