I do not understand why this common commercial operating system is trying to trick the users as if the only Media Center is available for Vista and 7. There are a lot of Media Center programs for Linux, from Live CDs to full-fledged home automation systems. I spent a weekend going through MythTV, XBMC, eAROS and Linux MCE in detail and I absolutely saw nothing less than the Windows' Media Center. In no way, XBMC or MythTV falls short; if you want to discuss about Linux MCE, Microsoft needs some more years to do the half of it.
So, in this perspective I wonder if the distributions and their communities are falling short of advertising the media center capabilities? Just think about a new convert from Windows to -say openSUSE: how will he know that a media center program (or programs) is available for his computer.
Why did I point to this issue: I am putting my hands on any device I see here in my country and always media center capabilities are in the top displayed features. Think about HP, Sony, Acer and all the big guys showing how elegant their media centers are. In fact they are not showing the Windows' native media center but rather their own. I know it is not more than eye-candy but in terms of this "eye candy" that the end users value, Windows has a long way to go, considering at least the Compiz Fusion.
I wonder if the developers or the foundations/companies can also put a media center in their default installations and advertise this with the screenshots and other media? I think this will close another gap (which is unexistent by the way) which users ask "can I do everything in Linux that I can do in Windows?"
Gen8 Solutions' Emailchemy and Harvester technologies vastly extend and improve the email import capabilities of MPP Archive's MPP Green architecture.
New Rochelle, NY - June 1, 2009- Mailspect Inc. is pleased to announce a new partnership with Gen8 Solutions, the creator of the Emailchemy and Harvester email import and migration technologies to better support legacy email formats such as PST files. With this partnership, Mailspect is extending the benefits of the MPP Green architecture to unify email stores of virtually all varieties into web accessible, searchable and optimized archives MPP Green can now unify email formats like Microsoft's PST, and many other proprietary and outdated formats.
MPP Archive offers a comprehensive email archive solution that is ideally suited for environments that have strict archive and discovery requirements but want an open and cost-effective Linux based solution. MPP archives, indexes and optimizes real-time email streams from MS Exchange and popular MS Exchange replacements like Zimbra, Zarafa, Scalix, Open-Xchange and others. With the recently announced MPP Green architecture, MPP Archive intelligently imports proprietary and standards-based mail stores such as IMAP and GMAIL and provides efficient single instance storage and cross-mailbox searching. It de-dupes emails, strips duplicative attachments, scans based on content inspection rules as well as cleanses and purges long-dated emails. MPP Green converts fragmented mail stores to indexed, full-text searchable, centralized archives. As such, MPP Archive can serve as the basis for email lifecycle management.
Using the Harvester option, MPP Green can automatically find and import private PST folders stored on end-user desktop and laptop disk drives. These capacities will enable mail administrators to centralize disparate mail stores into a single, searchable email archive. Aggregating email stores improves compliance with corporate and government email retention and retrieval rules and regulations.
In addition, the new MPP Green extensions can import email from all of the following email servers: AOL for Windows ("PFC" files), Claris Emailer for Macintosh, CompuServe Classic for Macintosh (aka "MacCIM"), CompuServe 2000 for Windows, Entourage (Database, .RGE Archives and cache files), Eudora, Mac OS X Mail, Mozilla, Mulberry, Musashi, Neoplanet, Netscape, Opera, Outlook for Windows (.PST and .OST files), Outlook Express for Macintosh, Outlook Express for Windows, Outlook Express for UNIX/Solaris, PowerTalk/AOCE for Macintosh, QuickMail Pro for Macintosh, QuickMail Pro for Windows, Thunderbird, Yahoo! Mail and any UNIX-style or mbox-format mailbox.
To download a fully configured, VMware-based virtual appliance of MPP Archive for evaluation, go to: http://www.mailspect.com/download
About Mailspect www.mailspect.com
Mailspect, Inc. based in New Rochelle, New York, is the developer of the Message Processing Platform or MPP. MPP offers clients a comprehensive and integrated suite used for email archiving, compliance and quarantine, complete with spam filters, email policy management, email import and email retention solutions. MPP integrates with leading anti spam and antivirus products and currently is installed in client mail systems that process billions of emails per day.
Contact Info: Paul Sterne, Chief Marketing Officer, email@example.com
About Gen8 Solutions http://www.gen8solutions.com/
Michigan-based, Gen8 Solutions was formed in partnership with Weird Kid Software in 2007 to provide technology to the enterprise market segment. Weird Kid Software has been marketing email conversion technology to the consumer market since 2002. Since its inception, Weird Kid Software has sold and supported its products to tens of thousands of clients worldwide.
Contact Info: Phil Okun,
, +1 248.918.9792
I have just joined and set up my profile in Linux.com.
I just wanted to say "hi" to the wonderful Linux.com community.
All the best
I did a short test on Python signal handling over at my other blog. For those interested...
Ubuntu - LTS
Ubuntu GNU/Linux Long Term Support which are the Ubuntu GNU/Linux versions that are supported for three years for desktop versions and five years for server versions.
The first LTS Ubuntu version that was issued was Ubuntu 6.06 LTS Dapper Drake, which was released in June 2006. The second was Ubuntu 8.04 LTS Hardy Heron, which was released in April 2004 (per the numbering scheme -- first digit being the issuance year and second being the month number.) The next scheduled LTS Ubuntu version is Ubuntu 10.04 (which is currently tentatively scheduled.)
As may be already evident, there is no true way to get the full three years (much less five) of support (which is actually just operating system and software security and stability updates -- basically bug fixes.) You see if these versions are supported for three years but are issued every two years, how is it possible to get continuously three full years or supported use without the need to do a full reinstall or upgrade of your operating system.
You see, unlike most Ubuntu users (most of which are power/geeks users of which I somewhat regard myself), I do not get my "kicks" from reinstalling my operating system and/or performing a version upgrade every six to eighteen months. (On a somewhat unrelated note, I am rarely impressed by Linux distro version reviews through a "virtual machine" as it seems to me that the only way one can get a true indication of an operating system's performance is by performing a true hard drive install and putting this new install through approximate real world use for a few days -- with the exception of distros which are never really intended to be installed on a hard drive such as Puppy Linux.) So, I do appreciate the LTS Long Term Support Ubuntu GNU/Linux versions which, at least, minimize my need to perform a major OS upgrade and/or reinstall.
In this regard, I believe I am most like the truly "average" user who want his/her PC to "just work" and does not want to be hassled by operating system upgrades / reinstalls. I recently read an interesting statistic that approximately 77% of Ubuntu users are currently already using Ubuntu 9.04 Jaunty Jackalope (it is May 28, 2009, as I write this.) This tells me that 77% of Ubuntu users are truly geek power GNU/Linux users and are not the "average" user Ubuntu is now targeting, for, like me, the "average" user clearly does not want to be bothered with an operating sysem upgrade / reinstall every six months. (As a side note, I applaud Dell for sticking with Ubuntu 8.04 LTS for their pre-install Ubuntu GNU/Linux sales.)
I do not believe in performing an operating system upgrade / reinstall unless the new version presents a "compelling" reason to upgrade. As such, I am still running Ubuntu 8.04.2 LTS on our home PCs. Clearly Ubuntu 8.10 Intrepid Ibex did NOT present a "compelling" reason to upgrade. Ubuntu 9.04 Jaunty Jacklope did approach the compelling threshold, but I am still holding out for the next LTS release (frankly, probably the point 2 release in July 2010 for bug fixes.) (In the interest of full disclosure, I did install 9.04 on my folks PC, but they needed a new hard drive installed anyway so it made sense to install it -- since a reinstall was required anyway.)
Based upon my peripheral observations, it seems that with Ubuntu's cut throat six month release schedule, new features are introduced in each new release that are far from perfected until at least the next subsequent release. In support of the preceding statement, consider pulse-audio, ext4, x.org (without an actual x.org file.)
I would much prefer that Ubuntu change to a one-year release cycle for routine releases and three years for LTS releases (not every two years for three year supported LTS releases as it is now so one could actually get a full three years support.) With a one-year release cycle, ample time would be afforded so new features could actually work properly and bugs could actually be fixed and more and more would "just work" as it should.
Just my two cents for now. Thanks for reading.
Mark, did you get this? (Shuttleworth)
I've taken some time tonight to reflect on where I've been over the past 3 weeks.
I sparked interest in myself on trying Linux and soon realized that the "GUI" alone would not suffice. I poked around a bit, started to ask questions. Installed Ubuntu on a dual cpu Amd box. It ran fine , was stable and it wasn't Windows. Except for that hideous brown default desktop all worked fine untill that computer's power supply died.
I started looking into other distro's and ran into the LFS liveCD.. I booted fast and loaded entirely onto my ram, all the programs were snappy. Something I wasn't used to on an old Pentium4 machine with 256 mg of ram. I soon remedied the ram problem as I was ordering a new power supply for the Amd machine I got 2 512mg stick for this Dell 4550. That is the max this machine takes.
Well, curiousity got the best of me and I went and started reading on the LFS site and saw that there were only 3 books needed as prerequisites ???????????? I can do this , I thought to myself. That started my journey. After reading about 1/3 of the first book and blasting thru the software building book. I tried unsuccessfully to build LFS. I went into the IRC channel and after 7 pathetic attempts to build . I realised that I needed more knowledge
I went back and started being specific, getting a couple of notepads to keep notes. And have I kept notes !!! I even made a laminated overlay for Vim for my keyboard shortcuts and bash. I've used Google alot, sometimes it helps sometimes not.I've used IRC.... Pastebin has become my friend, I've adapted the approach that I can write down what I've done first before I go into IRC and document all that I've read and what I've done step by step instead of trying to explain it to someone , and half way into it they interrupt you and assume the wrong thing.
I as a newb am sure that I speak for all newb's in saying everything is not in the blankety,blank , blank, blank, manual. Each situation is different, many times even the most experienced guys are not going to have the answers In IRC. I realize this. That's why it's so important that I exhaust every possible avenue before I go to IRC. At the same time, It's important to note that many new users like myself are not acedemics, we are blue collar regular guys,we understand regular words, not scientific words. Many of the top notch people in Linux and free software as a whole have a computer science background , with formal training where they have the interaction with their teacher to reinforce what they've learned. When us blue collar guys learn from a book, we don't know what works until we get some experience under our belts to know ... build confidence. With experience we will gain confidence in ourselves, but when things go wrong, with no interaction it's easy to lose prospective.
Case in point, my pata cable incident , the night before I started installing I stayed up and read an online Grub "tutorial" the whole book, drive mapping and all, dealing with windows etc. I get up in the morning (note the drive in question just had windows on it and had no problems). I get the idea that I'm going to put another linux on my second drive, when I try to reboot it doesn't work. I'm like , I just read that book, I couldn't have made a mistake??? I nuked it off and redid the whole thing.. about 10pm that next night I'm ready to reboot again this time the computer hangs????? oh crap how do I deal with this? I power off and now it won't boot, I thing I've messed up the drive powering off. So, I use fsck. and no errors. Anyway I'm taking note of specific errors and I get a live cd and boot in and copy mtab, fstab, and grub conf and pastebin the whole thing. While I'm in the room waiting for someone to help I'm talking about the options in grub and here we go again , I'm being accused of not following the install guide and not reading the manual, I'm beginning to think that , it's the easy way of saying I'll talk to you but I'm not willing to invest the time to fix it, or I don't have the answer so, I'll just say you're not following the manual, In the end it wasn't my lack of knowledge, it was a hardware problem.
Oh, and what the heck is this deal where fdisk list hda and when you boot the kernel says sda??, and even grub is getting into the act and wants sda or sdxx whatever and some versions I see used the uuid even? , I've got the system up and running and I'm not quite right yet as there are answers I need but , at this point in time, I'm looking for a local users' group to join as I can do without the accusations. I've worked very hard to learn what I've learned in the short amount of time I've been at it. I'm not going away anytime soon.
I'm going to say one last thing on this subject and that is a very big Thank You to "Cosmo" on the LFS-support channel for being a great guy and straight forward person. Thanks again for all your help.
Guys, surely most of you know and realize Linux is a great OS. The problem is no one uses it and no commercial apps work with it. (generalizing here sure a few things work)
What can we do to help Linux reach higher levels?
My proposals are
1. Focus on polish and ease of use.
a. to install an app there should be a universal way. Users dont care about how they want it done. When a user clicks on install they want an install to happen.
b. More commercial apps. Focus on games. Surely there is a sharp group out there that could get with some of these companies to work to help port some apps to Linux. In this economy people want cheaper products and Microsoft isnt cheap. With more linux netbooks and phones etc coming out it is gaining some recognition. If you could show a business how they could make money with Linux apps I think they would be more apt to accept it than ever before.
c. come up with a unified linux. I know I know this is a sin but come on guys, surely we could have a standard vendors or customers could choose that defaulted to a certain look and functionality. Most people dont need 10000 apps or 12 apps that do the same thing. And besides you could setup this standard to only apply if selected?
d. Be heard. We need more communication on the benefits of linux. Hands on demos at the stores, blogs, some type of marketing from the big Linux companies, etc.
e. better hardware support. This has come a long ways. I still here "its Company XYZ's drivers that suck", well that may be, but surely something can be done about this.
I know this probably isnt 100% the way to do it and I will probably be flamed but I really would like to see Linux have its day.
I received this in my inbox today:
"Hello, My name is juliet, i got you from linux.com, and i want to have a good relationship with you, please i need your cooperation, am yours juliet. this is my email, (
Yesterday I got something very similar from "mary." She wanted to start a relationship with me too. It seems like there are many lonely women out there after me. I suppose this could be true, but it is more likely an attempt to pull some swindle or other.
ERP Platforms I have tested:
Platform: Ubuntu Server 7.10, Tomcat5.5
Both installed easily enough, but the Accountants were gun shy. Somewhere along the line they had had a difficult experience with ERP in general, but now OpenSource ERP in particular. I found myself wishing that I had paid more attention to accounting. As it was I had a very hard time just staying awake. Maybe there is a good book out there that explains the principles, and focuses on the financial modeling required to get an ERP off of the ground. Some day I would really like to get a good pilot of one of these off of the ground.
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has got to be a low point in our countries regulation history. This miserable piece of legislation costs anyone who has to comply with it millions of dollars and provides nothing in return. IT departments get hammered with insane requirements, and moronic auditors that eat up hours like it's cotton candy. " Screen shot this, prove that", and one ridiculous question after another until you want to stick a shank into all of them. If your organization can avoid this hell, then it is worth it to do so. How? Stay private. The instant you go public...you can join me and the auditors in our little version of purgatory. Rant finished.
Linux related question:
How to prove that password policies are enforced on Linux systems?
I have used ticketing systems to documentation steps, and severely limited access to my Linux systems in order to comply with this requirement, but auditors always want more. They want an automated foolproof system that enforces policy and will take nobody's word for it. I am looking into how to enforce such policies on my linux boxes now. I have some reading to do and will publish my findings.