-
vonbiber
-
RE: Choosing a distro: Pros and Cons from real users
-
installed linux system: slackware 12.0
I have installed slackware 13.0 but haven't got around to use it yet.
slackware is the very first linux system I installed (can't remember the version number but it's one-digit).
I also use live linux systems that I carry on a usb stick: slax, grml, RIPlinux, pmagic
I concur with karma's pros
A non-graphical installer: that might scare people away
People might think that you have to type in cryptic command lines on the console.
True: it's not as slick as some other distros (with flashy icons, messages,
the ability to use the mouse ...). However it doesn't mean you have to type in
cryptic command lines on the console. The installer uses the ncurses-based dialog.
You can do your selections by navigating through different options (brief help messages provided).
Rather than a limitation I find this an asset.
Also you don't answer an endless string of questions. It's kept to the minimum.
Once you've made the initial selections the installation is blazingly fast.
con:
the only boot loader offered is lilo
fortunately you can choose not to install a boot loader
slackware is a source-based distribution. It's less dependency-prone than other
systems that use prebuilt packages.
intended users:
I do think that slackware is for everone including noobs.
Over the years I have installed (and sometimes briefly used) a few other distros:
redhat, caldera, debian, libranet, vector linux, mandrake, opensuse, (k/x/)ubuntu, ...
Mostly out of curiosity.
But slackware is definitely my distro of choice.
-
09 Oct 09
installed linux system: slackware 12.0
I have installed slackware 13.0 but haven't got around to use it yet.
slackware is the very first linux system I installed (can't remember the version number but it's one-digit).
I also use live linux systems that I carry on a usb stick: slax, grml, RIPlinux, pmagic
I concur with karma's pros
A non-graphical installer: that might scare people away
People might think that you have to type in cryptic command lines on the console.
True: it's not as slick as some other distros (with flashy icons, messages,
the ability to use the mouse ...). However it doesn't mean you have to type in
cryptic command lines on the console. The installer uses the ncurses-based dialog.
You can do your selections by navigating through different options (brief help messages provided).
Rather than a limitation I find this an asset.
Also you don't answer an endless string of questions. It's kept to the minimum.
Once you've made the initial selections the installation is blazingly fast.
con:
the only boot loader offered is lilo
fortunately you can choose not to install a boot loader
slackware is a source-based distribution. It's less dependency-prone than other
systems that use prebuilt packages.
intended users:
I do think that slackware is for everone including noobs.
Over the years I have installed (and sometimes briefly used) a few other distros:
redhat, caldera, debian, libranet, vector linux, mandrake, opensuse, (k/x/)ubuntu, ...
Mostly out of curiosity.
But slackware is definitely my distro of choice.