Linux.com

Linux Store

Link to this post 13 Nov 13

That is what I have ended up doing. Except when the artwork is licensed under a LGPL, GPL, CC, etc. license that grants anyone the rights to share and remix. The only thing that is kind of iffy is the attribution part:
"– You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work)."

Many distributions have their artwork released under this license, and should for most of the part be OK to use. Nevertheless, as long as you do not use any artwork with any negative intentions, most of these distributions would probably want their community to do these kind of things.

This goes for Manjaro, Sabayon, Gentoo, and several others.

Not that would want to make a t-shirt with every distributions that is out there (Arch and Debian is two distributions I highly respect, and some other artwork is somewhat known and looks nice), but it made me curious to see what kind of policies the distributions have for use of their trademarks. As I would believe that creators would want their community to spread walk around with commercial for free to spread their work, it seems to be harder than it should be for some instances, but that most distributions have strict guidelines is understandable.

However, community creativity and openness seems to not always follow the open source ideology of GNU/Linux, as I would expect in a higher degree than what it seems. Often, remixes as long as it resembles the original logo, and colors to match color of the t-shirt (or if you prefer colors of your own likings), and in no disrespectful manner could but a personal feel to the products, and I can not see how this can harm a distribution. Although I can see how it can feel daunting to give this much freedom to use trademarks for many purposes.

Some of them have very useful information on what you are allowed to do and not. Considering if you are allowed to use for these intentions. For example, the:

Arch Linux says that logo for personal usage is perfectly fine, and that it is covered under Fair Use . Their trademark say this however (as I read today):
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/DeveloperWiki:TrademarkPolicy
"Restricted use that requires a trademark license
Use for merchandising purposes, e.g. on t-shirts and the like."
Commercial use is already covered in the list, if this was regarding use, it should already be covered, so I would interpret that as a general rule for both non-commercial and commercial use. I am not from an English speaking country, so might not have the correct understanding of the word, but this is Google's definition:
"the activity of promoting the sale of goods, esp. by their presentation in retail outlets."
In this case it would not be promoting sales of Arch Linux, since it is free.

Debian have information about use of their logo on these two pages:
http://www.debian.org/News/2013/20130301
"Debian logos and marks may now be used freely for both non-commercial and commercial purposes."

but here:
http://www.debian.org/trademark
"You can make t-shirts, desktop wallpapers, caps, or other merchandise with Debian trademarks for non-commercial usage."

However, it is released under English under a LGPLv3 or later, or if you want, CC BY-SA 3.0, and a stylized word “debian”, which is apparently not copyrightable. Meaning that it should be OK to use this logo also with slightly altering the image, at least for personal use.

The OpenSuse logo have very specific rules on colors, placement of logo and text, font, etc. But their Geeko logo can have its own colors, and be altered.
http://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Artwork_brand

They also give this information:
You are welcome to make use of the openSUSE Marks to produce merchandise such as t-shirts, hats, bags, jackets, sweatshirts, mugs, and desktop wallpapers and give them to your friends, family, community members, provided there is no commercial interest behind it. You have to request permission if you want to commercially distribute articles using the openSUSE Marks (see "Contact Information" below to request permission).
http://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Trademark_guidelines

As well as:
http://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Artwork_t-shirts

Fedora requires permission:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legal:Trademark_guidelines
Usage That Requires Permission
Non-software goods
"Community members may request from the Fedora Board a license to use the Fedora trademarks on non-software related goods, services, or other entities. The Board, or someone it delegates for the task, will ask to see the proposed designs before approving the use."
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legal:Trademark_guidelines
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Logo/UsageGuidelines

Ubuntu also seems to have strict rules regarding colors and alignment:
http://design.ubuntu.com/brand/ubuntu-logo
And I would also need a written agreement for use of their logo in this manner.

Link to this post 14 Feb

I always wanted the hoodie from the linux store. And i can't even find an image of it online.

Does anyone know if the store will come up again?

Link to this post 26 Apr

I'm hoping someone can help me. I'm a long time Linux user (10+ years). A buddy (guru) and I are thinking of building a pair of mirror machines, so we have waded back out into the cruel world of hardware. My current setup was built 10 years ago consisting of a ASUS SK8V mobo, an AMD Opteron 246, and 2 GB of ECC RAM, and crammed into a full size tower holding a ton of hardware, including floppy drives of both sizes, 3 different CD-ROM players, and 4 different HD, running 4 different OS's. It serves as a workstation, and testbed (I'm the "official guinea pig")to test out new OS's before he commits to deploy them in a research environment. When it was built is *was* really high end at the time. Ten years later it is still running well, but it is now OLD.

We are currently in the research phase of identifying components that will work well with LINUX. After searching, and searching I found what seems to be a nice Motherboard (I've already tossed a number out of consideration based on reviews, etc.). The board is a Gigabyte GA-970A-UD3P (rev. 1.0), but there is very little information out there, few reviews, and most of what is out there is more from Windoze users, and precious little about how well this board works with Linux. I've done a lot of research and we've decide to go with --IF be build it -- a 95W AMD FX3600 six core processor and initially between 4-8 GB RAM, given that this mobo is expandable to 32 GM RAM, and we still have topside if we want to upgrade the processors, we expect that we will have computers that will be current for several years. Any information you could provide about how well this board works with LINUX would be greatly appreciated.

Link to this post 27 Apr

First, I highly recommend posting a new topic so that it does not clutter existing posts.

2nd, I cannot talk about that specific motherboard but it is very similar to the one that I am using in my desktop, it is very stable without major hardware issues, the only issue that I have is with the fact that it it will not boot a linux image from a flash drive, it only supports windows based flash drives in the bios, all installations will need to be done from disk.

Who we are ?

The Linux Foundation is a non-profit consortium dedicated to the growth of Linux.

More About the foundation...

Frequent Questions

Join / Linux Training / Board