Linux.com

Feature: BSD

PC-BSD works for community center

By Henry Gillow-Wiles on July 03, 2006 (8:00:00 AM)

Share    Print    Comments   

As the IT director for a non-profit community center, I face several challenges, the most pressing being the lack of money. This means our lab is filled with donated older equipment with limited capabilities. Given this state of affairs, I am always on the lookout for free, easy-to-use open source software. I chose PC-BSD as our standard operating system because of its exemplary performance on older equipment.

When considering an operating system for our hardware, I have a couple of requirements. First comes performance. The operating system needs to be usable on Pentium III equipment. If end users have to wait for applications, they get frustrated and start clicking on stuff. I then get to clear print queues with 40 copies of the same print job. The second requirement is ease of use. Our users for the most part are not very computer-literate and come from a Windows environment, so consistency in desktop look and feel helps them transition to an open source operating system, and helps me not to have to answer too many questions involving differences in doing common tasks.

After looking at several Linux distributions and finding them lacking in either speed, ease of use, or ease of management, I tried PC-BSD. This OS installed quickly and ran well on all but the most limited Pentium I equipment. With a default installation, PC-BSD feels snappier than the Windows 98SE that usually shows up on the donated equipment. I has also been stable, with few unexpected system freezes or crashes.

Because we use a wide variety of equipment, compatibility is always an issue. I have had no difficulty with printer, scanner, or other peripheral installation. PC-BSD has detected and supplied drivers for almost everything we have.

Applications for open source operating systems used to be both limited in scope and hard to install. PC-BSD has addressed these problems by bundling commonly used applications with the initial installation and presenting an installation process that mimics the Windows install routine.

Users in our lab do the same things average computer users do in their homes. PC-BSD lets them play DVDs and MP3s and view pictures. Most of our computers see primary use for email, Web surfing, and documentation creation. The Mozilla Web browser and Thunderbird email client are easy to use and resistant to the dangers of uninformed surfing, which reduces my maintenance workload. Office suite OpenOffice.org's offers good compatibility with Microsoft Office, so whatever documents users bring from outside to edit and print can be imported and easily dealt with.

Adding or removing applications with PC-BSD is easier than with some other major open source operating systems. Instead of having to worry about dependencies or installation locations, PC-BSD has developed the PBI installation format. Packages are downloaded as self-installing, complete applications with a graphical installation interface. This format helps me keep the computers useful to the community by having new programs for them to use.

Here at the center we host classes on different aspects of computer use. Sometimes users bring their own equipment to class. PC-BSD is good at detecting and integrating Windows equipment into our network and sharing resources such as printers with the new equipment. Sometimes students use our desktop PCs. Because it is easy to use, the KDE window manager allows students apply their new skills to their Windows computers at home with minimal difficulty.

If you have an older computer and want to move from Windows to a more useful, stable, secure operating system that will have good performance and lots of available software, PC-BSD is well worth your time. If you have current equipment and just don't want to deal with the constant security patching cycle, PC-BSD is a good choice as well.

Share    Print    Comments   

Comments

on PC-BSD works for community center

Note: Comments are owned by the poster. We are not responsible for their content.

Faster than win98? Um, ok...

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on July 04, 2006 02:27 PM

A good read but PCBSD faster than win98? I find this incredibly hard to believe.

Win95/98 still astounds me in terms of speed on older hardware.

Can anyone else add more details to this statement?

Thanks

C

#

Re:Faster than win98? Um, ok...

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on July 05, 2006 07:32 PM
I've no experience of PC-BSD but it sounds plausible.

A fresh install of old Windows is zippy enough (as is one that's been well looked after - I happily ran Windows NT4 on a PIII til very recently), but once a user's loaded it down with games, applications, shareware and whatnot the Registry fills up and performance nosedives.

#

Re:Faster than win98? Um, ok...

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on July 05, 2006 08:02 PM

Fair enough but I would still like to say a loaded (not thrashed down with malware and shareware and your auntie's ware) win98 would still feel snappier on a PIII than a fresh install of PCBSD...

But I have not tried PCBSD on older hardware. Anyone??

C

#

Re:Faster than win98? Um, ok...

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on July 07, 2006 06:05 PM
I reccommend you test it then. It is very snappy.
T

#

Re:Faster than win98? Um, ok...

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on July 09, 2006 12:59 PM
PC-BSD may not be as zippy an WIN98 but it definitely looks and feels better. I have more options to customizing PC-BSD. Also I don't have to purchase expensive software just to do basic office work or listen to music!


  What really makes me jump for joy about PC-BSD is the fact that installing it is soooo easy! I've run the gambit of Linux distros and frankly all I really want for my normal user box is a good solid desktop system. PC-BSD fills that need perfectly.

#

Re:Faster than win98? Um, ok...

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on July 28, 2006 03:48 AM
I regularly run PC-BSD on Pentium3 and have been for the past 6 months. It runs fine on 800MHz processor. (HP Vectra 8i)

(You can probably get these on Ebay for under $200. Thats where I get all my PC's.) I haven't tried on slower then 800MHz.

I only run Win98se and PC-BSD for desktops and PC-BSD is my future once I quit Win98se. MS stopped supporting it earlier this month. I just need IE running on Wine on PC-BSD and I will quit Win98se.

#

Have tried it and liked what I saw

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on July 06, 2006 07:35 AM
I read another glowing review of PC-BSD somewhere which prompted me to download and try it. Very impressive. And being BSD-based is a very re-assuring component. There’s a wealth of top software available as PBI’s from <a href="http://www.pbidir.com/" title="pbidir.com">http://www.pbidir.com/</a pbidir.com>. This one is definitely the pick of the bunch so far for the casual not-so-guru user.

#

Re: Faster than Win98?

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on August 16, 2006 06:39 PM
I concur. Beating Win95/98 in terms of speed seems rather far-fetched. Be it boot-up speed or low memory requirements, Win95/98 is certainly the reigning king. I would like to see some more information in support of this claim. As far as I know, and I use the real FreeBSD, *no* unix-like OS (that includes, GNU/Linux, *BSD) has ever been able to beat Windows 95/98 or even NT 3.5/4.0 in a feature-for-feature resource-usage comparison. Microsoft actually started producing bloated software from Windows 2000 onwards, and the bloat is horrible with Vista.

#

This story has been archived. Comments can no longer be posted.



 
Tableless layout Validate XHTML 1.0 Strict Validate CSS Powered by Xaraya