Linux.com

Feature

A first look at Thunderbird 2.0

By Joe 'Zonker' Brockmeier on December 20, 2006 (8:00:00 AM)

Share    Print    Comments   

After many months of development, Thunderbird 2.0 is almost ready to debut. The Mozilla Foundation released the first beta of Thunderbird 2.0 last week, and I've been using it to manage my mail since then. The new release boasts tagging, history navigation, new mail alerts, improved extension support, and a number of other features. Thunderbird 2.0 won't knock your socks off with exciting new features, but it's a nice, gradual improvement over the Thunderbird 1.5 series.

One of the things I didn't like about Thunderbird 1.x was that you were limited to five labels for messages. You could customize the color and text for the label, but five was the limit. Three there shall not be, and six was right out. Thunderbird 2.0 ditches labels altogether and goes for the Web 2.0 gusto with tags -- as many tags as you want.

So, what's so special about tagging, rather than just saving messages by folder or giving them labels as in previous releases of Thunderbird?

The primary advantage to tagging is that a message can have multiple tags, but a message could only have one predefined label in previous Thunderbird releases. So, for instance, if you run your own business and you get a message from a client, you might want to tag that with a tag for the client, and a to-do tag to follow up on the message. If you're a Getting Things Done (GTD) maniac, you can implement the tags necessary for GTD and still have tags left over.

Thunderbird assigns the first nine tags keyboard shortcuts -- 1 through 9 will assign a tag, 0 will remove a tag. If you have more than nine tags, you'll have to assign tags to messages using the menu shortcuts or the mouse.

Thunderbird 2.0 in wide mode
Thunderbird 2.0 in wide mode and tagged messages - click to view

If you want to reprioritize tags, so that a newly added tag gets a shortcut, you have to delete and re-add tags to move them -- Thunderbird doesn't allow you to reorder the tags via its preference dialog. I looked through the Config Editor to see if it might be possible to tweak the tag order in that way, but I couldn't find any preference names that seemed tied to the tag order.

You can also use tags to help set up virtual folders from saved searches. Thunderbird 2.0 supports saved searches, so you can, for example, create a saved search that looks in one or more folders for messages that match certain criteria. Thunderbird will search by subject, tag, date, priority, status, age in days, and much more.

Like many folks, I've organized my mail by folders -- work mail goes into one folder, LUG mail goes into another folder, receipts from ecommerce sites go into yet another folder, and so forth. As you might imagine, I wind up with a lot of folders this way. Plus, some mail inevitably crosses over into more than one category, so I can either make a copy of the message and waste disk space, or try to remember whether I filed a receipt for expenses as "work" or "receipt."

By combining tags and saved searches, I can cut down dramatically on the number of folders that I use. I have set up saved searches for the "work," "lug," and other tags. Granted, this still gives me quite a few saved search folders, but it's a slightly better method of organization than literal folders.

If you guessed that Thunderbird took the tagging cue from GMail, you're probably right. Thunderbird also implements another of my favorite GMail features in 2.0: starred messages. As you're reading through mail or RSS/Atom feeds, you can just star messages that you want to highlight and then go back through them later for processing.

Thunderbird 2.0 also introduces a "move again" feature, so if you move a piece of mail to a folder, the menu spawns a "Move to folder Again" entry. The move again feature can also be activated with Ctrl-Shift-M or used from the context menu.

This is quite handy if you're going through your mailbox and filing mail in the same folder. If you save mail in several different folders, though, you'll either need to make several passes through your inbox, or file messages normally.

How many clicks does it take...?

One thing that hasn't improved a great deal over Thunderbird 1.5 is account setup. Thunderbird is easy to set up if you have a single email address, but it can present a twisty maze of preference windows and dialogs for those folks who need to configure multiple accounts or use nonstandard ports.

I'm also surprised that the Thunderbird developers have set Thunderbird to default to sending all mail through a single SMTP server. For example, if I set up two accounts using Thunderbird -- say a work account and a GMail account -- Thunderbird will happily allow me to send mail from my OSTG address through GMail with no complaint. In fact, the Add Account wizard allows no way to choose an SMTP server, so any SMTP configuration has to be done after setting up the account.

This is an astonishingly bad idea, since many spam filters are triggered by mail being routed through a server that isn't set up as an MX host for the domain that the mail appears to be coming from. Having done support for a hosting provider, I know that this a good way to consign a user's mail straight to spam/junk folders and instigate a lot of calls to the ISP about why mail is disappearing.

Thunderbird also doesn't allow you to specify your POP3 or IMAP ports during the configuration; that too has to be done separately after the initial configuration.

I find Thunderbird's preference dialogs a bit confusing too. You might think that the choice of SMTP server would be found under the Server Settings dialog, or at least under Advanced Settings in that dialog, but it's actually under the top-level dialog for the account settings.

If you're converting from another mail client to Thunderbird, you won't get much help from Thunderbird -- unless you're converting from Communicator. I was hoping there'd be additional import tools with the 2.0 release, but no such luck. Migration is covered under the Thunderbird FAQ, but users are basically left to their own devices to export mail from their old client into a format (mbox) that Thunderbird can digest. Even then, users have to locate the Thunderbird profile directory and copy things over manually.

Alert! Alert! You've got mail!

Thunderbird 2.0 includes new and improved pop-up messages to show that new mail has appeared in your inbox. In the new release, the pop-up dialog displays the subject, sender, and some of the message text. I find it amusing that the Mozilla Firefox developers have worked hard to suppress unwanted pop-up ads in the browser, while the Mozilla Thunderbird developers have been working to provide pop-ups in the mail client.

You can customize the fields to display in the alert, and choose message text, subject, and sender or a combination thereof. On my system, Thunderbird displays the alerts in the bottom right corner, using a dialog that's sort of like a cartoon bubble. (It's similar to the GNOME alert dialogs that pop up from the icon tray, except those are yellow.)

The display pops up when mailboxes are polled for new mail, so if you have Thunderbird set to automatically check for mail every 10 minutes, you're likely to see a pop-up every 10 minutes. You can also set Thunderbird to play a sound in addition to, or instead of, the visual alerts.

I know a lot of users want to be notified about new mail, but I found the pop-up feature annoying after the first 20 minutes, and turned it off shortly thereafter. Luckily, Thunderbird makes it easy to turn notification off. If you like notifications, but want them less frequently, you can tweak the polling settings under your accounts so that you are only notified every 30 minutes, every hour, or whatever interval works for you. You can also turn off polling for an account altogether if you prefer not to be notified of new mail for that account.

Moving forward back

Most mail clients have shortcuts to move to the next and previous messages, but Thunderbird is the first client I've seen with a feature for moving in the history of messages that you've viewed. Just as you can navigate through Firefox's history of Web pages, Thunderbird now allows you to move within the history of email messages that you've just read.

For example, if you have an inbox and saved message folder, and you read two messages in your inbox and then two messages in your saved message folder, you can go backwards through your message history by pressing [ and forward through the message history using ]. You can also add navigation buttons to your Thunderbird toolbar, but they're not there by default.

This could be a really useful feature, but it doesn't work quite as I might have hoped. If you read three or four messages in a folder, or even in different folders, you can navigate through that history just fine -- unless you move one of the messages. If you move the message, then it's dropped from the message history.

Still, I've found the history navigation feature useful a few times since I started using Thunderbird 2.0, and I expect it will grow on me even more as I continue to use it. It can be really useful if you use Thunderbird as your RSS feed reader.

Thunderbird 2.0 also comes with a new set of folder views. The default view is to display all of your account folders in the left pane. In 2.0, Thunderbird lets you narrow the folder view to unread folders, favorite folders, and recent folders.

I have dozens of mail folders, but I really only use about 10 of them regularly. With this release, you can tag the folders you use the most often as "favorite" folders and then toggle the folder display to favorites and only see the folders you use most often.

Extensions and updates

Thunderbird carries over the extension improvements from Firefox 2.0. Thunderbird has a single dialog, Add-Ons, for managing themes and extensions. You can install, disable, or uninstall extensions and themes via the Add-Ons dialog. Thunderbird will also check for extension updates, and automatically download those for you if any of your extensions have been updated.

I've been running a pre-release build for a while now, and Thunderbird has had several updates in that time. Everything has gone smoothly: Thunderbird sees an update, downloads it, and then notifies me that it needs to be restarted due to the update.

What's really nice is that Thunderbird automatically saves your messages as drafts if you're in mid-composition. The first time I installed an update and clicked "restart" I had forgotten I was in the middle of writing a message, and when Thunderbird restarted it didn't re-open the composition window -- but I found my message in the drafts folder.

Thunderbird's add-ons page is a bit of a muddle compared to the Firefox page, though. If you go to the Mozilla Add-Ons site, you'll notice that the Thunderbird Add-Ons link is almost buried at the bottom of the page in tiny type. If you manage to find that page, you'll see that the page with extensions is haphazardly categorized, and a number of the extensions linked from the Thunderbird Add-Ons site are Firefox-only.

Worth the upgrade?

Thunderbird 2.0 is full of small tweaks and a few additional features, but it's not a major overhaul. Still, it's worth the upgrade just for the tagging feature alone. Despite the fact that Thunderbird 2.0 is a beta, it has been very stable; I haven't had any major glitches and no crashes since I started using it last week. This is no trivial statement -- other GUI mailers I've used, such as KMail, tend to crash with some regularity.

The beta seems reliable enough for production use, so if you're not happy with your current mailer, or if you use Thunderbird now, back up your mail and give Thunderbird 2.0 beta 1 a shot.

Share    Print    Comments   

Comments

on A first look at Thunderbird 2.0

Note: Comments are owned by the poster. We are not responsible for their content.

Regular user.

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on December 21, 2006 04:05 AM
I've been using Thunderbird for some years. I've been told when I started that KMail was a better choice, but I had an agenda: I wanted to make sure a free mail client would be available at work, where the PHB forces Windows on a whim.

Problems I faced:
- as the article states, migrating from Outlook to Thunderbird is hard: I had to configure Outlook to be my default mail program, get all my mail files from the network, make them available in Outlook and then import them with Thunderbird.
- Being free software, one would expect Thunderbird to easily export back data to Outlook (this is necessary, because a colleague might not like the program and want to go back to Outlook); this is not so, which makes Thundebird a harder sell;
- Speed: Thunderbird has a slow message search (the one invoked from a right-click menu option)... it was bad when I had a slow PC and it ain't got any better with my current Flintstones machine...

Other than that is a pretty nice program. Particularly useful is the good LDAP integration, which allows for easier email addressing.

#

Re:Regular user.

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on December 21, 2006 12:25 PM
"Being free software, one would expect Thunderbird to easily export back data to Outlook (this is necessary, because a colleague might not like the program and want to go back to Outlook); this is not so, which makes Thundebird a harder sell;"

Since you're writing about im- and exporting mail, you must be storing mail locally. Something that I haven't seen anyone do in a corporate environment for some 5 years now.

If you store the messages on any IMAP server then no import/export ever needs to be done and you would be able to switch back and forth between any number of imap-compatible clients (which most mail clients are today).

#

Re:Regular user.

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on December 22, 2006 01:47 AM
> Since you're writing about im- and exporting mail, you must be storing mail locally. Something that I haven't seen anyone do in a corporate environment for some 5 years now.

Many do store mail locally, which really is totally braindamaged -- but you get these guys are not really professional, since they use Windows/Outlook which is just asking to be hit by a virus; in my case, though, I configure Thunderbird to store files on the fileserver (each user has a private area on the fileservers).

IMAP is really a very neat suggestion, thanks, appreciated... people at work almost don't use IMAP, maybe because of tradition or because we have a small inbox folder at the mailhost and the mail admin is a BOFH who does not want lusers to steal his server mail storage...<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)

Of course, a nobrainer is just forward one's messages to himself and d/l them to/from Thunderbird; this changes messages dates, which is undesirable. I guess changing from privately (even if non-locally) stored messages (POP) to IMAP would have the same undesired effect.

It must be mentioned there is a way to export messages from Thunderbird back to Outlook, but last time I checked it involved a not so pleasant Windows script (or so I remember...)

#

Does Sync Kolab work with Thunderbird 2

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on December 21, 2006 04:42 AM
"Sync Kolab
SyncKolab was written to add kolab functionality to thunderbird. It reads a selected Imap folder and synchronizes it with the local address book and calendar.
It has been tested under Thunderbird 1 for Windows and Linux".

<a href="http://www.gargan.org/extensions/synckolab.html" title="gargan.org">http://www.gargan.org/extensions/synckolab.html</a gargan.org>

But, does it work under Thunderbird 2?

#

Hmm

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on December 21, 2006 07:40 AM
I was just thinking of when Thunderbird 2.0 will come.
The most important in an e-mail client is security and privacy. There is tons of virus, spam, malware being sent around in spam. Mail that track if you open them, etc.

Gmail has some cool features. I like how you can archive away old e-mail, and how you can star important e-mail so you easily can find them. Labels are also very cool, I use them when I subscribe on Freshmeat.

#

Popups.

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on December 21, 2006 08:21 AM
Your comments regarding the addition of a popup notification with reference to browser popups seems rather bizarre.

Browser popups (typically advertising) is VERY different from a popup notification from a local application event, and making a link between the two discredits your review efforts.

#

Re:Popups.

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on December 21, 2006 09:49 AM
you are very cool

#

Re:Popups.

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on December 21, 2006 01:03 PM
Why, thanks!

#

Re:Popups.

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on December 22, 2006 12:34 AM
While it's true that there is a difference in CONTENT between ads and notifications, the irritation factor of being interrupted (and normally losing keyboard focus) is the same.

#

Image scaling

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on December 21, 2006 11:58 AM
I've had the same problem the author had in searching the Mozilla add-ons site for t'bird extensions. They've got Reese Cups (tm) there -- T'bird peanut butter mixed up with Firefox chocolate.

One extension (or, better yet, built-in) that would be useful is an image scaler. There are so many folks who don't have half a clue when they attach an image to an email. They take 'em straight out of their camera at 3600x2400 and slap 'em onto an email. What the recipient sees is just a tiny portion of the whole image.

Since Firefox already has image scaling built in, I've always wondered why T'bird doesn't. I was kind of hoping v2.0 would have it.

#

Re:Image scaling

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on December 21, 2006 08:46 PM
As I recall one of the image zoom in/out extensions for Firefox also works for Thunderbird (can't check right now as I'm at work - sorry)

#

Re:Image scaling

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on December 27, 2006 11:23 PM
Imagezoom is the one
<a href="http://imagezoom.yellowgorilla.net/" title="yellowgorilla.net">http://imagezoom.yellowgorilla.net/</a yellowgorilla.net>

#

Stared messages new?

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on December 21, 2006 05:53 PM
Thunderbird also implements another of my favorite GMail features in 2.0: starred messages.

This is just flagged messages with the picture changed from a flag to a star. Admittedly they have now made it visible by default, but it has been there for ages - or at least everything I had flagged for the last year is now stared...

#

Re:Stared messages new?

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on May 02, 2007 11:48 PM
How do I get back my flags?

#

Forwards

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on December 22, 2006 02:01 AM
Does forwarding still throw in all of the original message's headers?

#

Still will not use.

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on December 22, 2006 05:06 AM
I initially liked Thunderbird, but I stopped using it, because it made a huge mess of my multiple email accounts. It would work sometimes when connecting, but just hang other times, and it would not sort the email correctly. Mail would end up in wrong folders.

From the article it seems that no one bothered to do any usability test. This is a common pandemic now in the software world. Projects are just handed over to developers without any direction and they are left to decide how it looks and functions for a user.

Developers are coming at the project from a different position. To them it might make perfect sense why they placed a button or option on the fourth tab at the bottom under a submenu of a submenu. But to the actual user it makes no sense at all.

Usability test help in that they show how to design so that the average user has little or no trouble getting your software to work for them.

Successful software development actually ask people that have little or no experience with the project does this make sense, was it easy to figure out how to use, any suggestions how to make it easier to understand and use?

Usability is a very integral part of software development, but it seems it’s just becoming more of an afterthought.

#

Thunderbird is the first?

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on January 26, 2007 11:40 AM
Joe, you wrote 'Thunderbird is the first client I've seen with a feature for moving in the history of messages that you've viewed.', which is OK in the view of your experiences, but in the real world, Thunderbird is not the first client which can move between the different mailboxes in the history.

I think you have never tried Opera's Mail yet. You can move from one view to another in the history record, even with its famous Mouse Gesture.

#

Re:Thunderbird is the first?

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on January 27, 2007 12:28 AM
I tried to "moving in the history of messages" with Opera, but I can't.

The default mouse-gesture seems like "moving in the history of views I viewed."

How can I move in the history of messages?

#

Eudora import

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on January 27, 2007 01:35 AM
I realize this doesn't apply to Linux users, but I thought I'd mention it since it's not listed in the linked FAQ. Thunderbird has had fairly decent support for importing mail from Eudora since 1.0. Not perfect, but the messages, folders, and (usually) attachments make it through.

The <a href="http://wiki.mozilla.org/Penelope" title="mozilla.org">Penelope</a mozilla.org> project (to build a Thunderbird-based version of Eudora) is starting with perfecting the Eudora importers, and it seems likely that the results will filter back into Thunderbird.

#

This story has been archived. Comments can no longer be posted.


 
Tableless layout Validate XHTML 1.0 Strict Validate CSS Powered by Xaraya