Linux.com

Feature: Migration

University finds freedom, flexibility in open source business intelligence

By Tina Gasperson on March 06, 2007 (8:00:00 AM)

Share    Print    Comments   

The University of Nebraska was always a Microsoft shop. U of N Data and Internet Specialist Amy Stephen remembers when Windows NT was new, with 27 installation disks. "We went with that because we had every network protocol that had ever been created, and every desktop applications that had ever been invented, right here. MS was the only ones you could have that diversity with." But when all of Microsoft's "natural predators" began to die off, and Microsoft no longer made the university's needs a priority, Stephen found open source solutions a lot more attractive.

Like most universities, Nebraska operates under a diversified leadership model, which means there's a tendency toward a hodgepodge of technologies. Twelve years ago, Microsoft handed Stephen free copies of SQL Server and NT to help her create a useful data warehouse to integrate information from all the disparate operational systems. "Because we didn't have to make people change, it was very easy to achieve success," Stephen says.

Gradually, Stephen's relationship with Microsoft changed, as the company took over more and more of the commercial operating system and business application space. "Lotus 1-2-3 went away, and WordPerfect isn't what it was," she says. "Quattro Pro started falling off the edge of the world." But Stephen was able to overlook the winds of change because "everybody moved to Office products and it made support easier. We didn't think much of it."

A forced move to Active Directory Structure was the wakeup call for Stephen. "The high-end tools [in SQL Server], like reporting and analysis services, and data warehousing tools, they started embedding the Active Directory into the security model and you were forced to use that structure for your domains to access those tools," she says. "In a university setting, there are a lot of domains [accessing the data warehouse] that are not 'trusted' domains. Essentially, [Microsoft] cut themselves out of our technology base.

"Microsoft always has nicely suited people coming in to see your CEOs, to encourage them to go with the sitewide licenses to avoid audits," Stephen says. "We would sit with them and say, 'Hey, we need you to [help us] integrate with SQL Server.' The impression I got was that the Microsoft people were snickering as they drove off. We didn't get a serious response."

So Stephen decided to cut SQL Server loose, and began looking at a couple of open source business intelligence suites. "We looked at Pentaho and were kind of leaning toward that product for a long time, but we went with JasperSoft because we were able to talk with people -- that helped us a lot." She launched a partial-scale migration to Jasper in the University's institutional research and planning department -- the heaviest users of business intelligence tools at the school. The research department is responsible for researching and reporting facts and statistics about the university, maintaining informational databases, and discerning overall trends in higher education.

The biggest challenge in rolling out the research department's system has been working around the end users' daily schedules and getting them familiar with new methods, Stephen says. "They are the ones who understand the reporting, and they need to be trained on the different model. We used to take their report requests and configure the ASP Web pages, build a report with drill-downs, and put it out on the Web site for everyone. Now we're using Joomla! as a framework. The users sit down with [Jasper's] iReport, connect to the data warehouse, and design a report. An XML file is sent to JasperServer and published, and then the report is available within the Joomla! framework for end users. They're very happy to be in control."

Stephen is happy too. "I can finally put an interactive Web site out to our customer base. We've been able to overcome the issue of the Active Directory problem."

Other university IT directors who are considering using open source should understand how the business model works, Stephen says. "Understand if the product is well-used and well-supported. When I introduced this idea to management, there was the question, 'Well, if open source is free, how can they afford to do this?' [They needed] to see that there's some revenue there, a way for the company to sustain itself, they're not going to be gone tomorrow."

Beyond examining the company behind the product, Stephen says understanding community support is vital too. "If there's good leadership, you can see results coming out of the group. Look at the community to see how active it is. Is progress driven by the community, or is it being dictated to? Try the software. Download it, talk to other people using it, find user groups.

"Open source is pretty amazing. It's a very different way of thinking about software."

Tina Gasperson writes for some of the most respected publications in the industry. She has been freelancing since 1998.

Share    Print    Comments   

Comments

on University finds freedom, flexibility in open source business intelligence

Note: Comments are owned by the poster. We are not responsible for their content.

Hmm

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on March 07, 2007 05:24 AM
It should be obvious that any academic institution, school, and university, should use free open source software and promote teaching, learning and sharing of information and knowledge.

#

Hmm, yourself!

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on March 07, 2007 10:36 AM
You don't work for a university or college, do you?

-AR

#

Re:Hmm, yourself!

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on March 07, 2007 11:01 PM
The first poster's comment seems very valid. Universities like lower schools should be teaching concepts not specific tools.

My network administration couse taught me Active Directory not the general concepts of directory services.

My programming courses taught me VB and C used within studio.net not general concepts of programming.

Today highschools teach students how to use Windows not how to use a computer regardless of what brand the WIMP desktop happens to display. This is like teaching all 16 year olds to drive a Chevy instead of any car or truck with peddals and steering.

Lastly, as a budget limited institution of higher learning, Universities should absalutely be using FOSS where possible. The very basis of Unviersities is informatino sharing and education.

The fact that Microsoft gives education a deal on it's closed product serves only to brand students as early as possible; again competing through marketing instead of quality. If Windows really was the better way rather than the more popular way I'd say ra ra Windows but it ain't so.

#

Re:Hmm, yourself!

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on March 08, 2007 12:59 AM
Yep, my university took that path for a while, too. The CompSci Dept. went from cc on UNIX to Microsoft's Visual C++ because of a large donation from Microsoft. However, that didn't teach them C/C++ programming; it taught them Windows programming--useless outside of the Windows environment. Our graduates were totally lost without the Microsoft IDE. *Other* companies started complaining and gradually stopped hiring our CompSci graduates....

That was not lost on the CompSci Dept. As a result, a few years later, they went to GCC on FreeBSD and brought back the original curriculum. Companies started hiring our graduates again.

Unfortunately, the MBA/MIS courses are still crack-addicted to VBA and Microsoft Office. Same with so-called "business classes" in high schools.

The motto seems to be, "train, not teach."

#

Re(1):Hmm, yourself!

Posted by: Anonymous [ip: 70.240.202.105] on November 25, 2007 03:27 AM
For a minute I thought I was the only one noticing this. I have also noticed that CIS/MIS grads have become more attractive under this "train, not teach" initiative by MS. They are able to quickly build applications as long as it doesn't deviate from the drag and drop capabilities of Visual Studio or the framework structure of ASP.net for example. But some of them will run from a conversation on general programming or alternative technologies like the plague. When forced to build their own software architecture some of them are lost.

I have run into some that literally had no knowledge of anything non Microsoft like a so called web developer that was shocked to find that Apache led the web server market by far. I worked in an all MS shop once where a project would come to a dead halt if MS did not have a solution for a problem. Show them an alternative and they'd come up with every excuse in the book to avoid even considering it. And MS plays into this well. I have taken note of how they take existing ideas from other products and rename them and the MS faithful drool all over the shiny new toys. They have no clue that it has been done before because they don't know anything outside of MS. I could only laugh at their excitement behind anything MS released.

#

Re:Hmm, yourself!

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on March 08, 2007 12:30 AM
He might not, but I used to. I was a Windows sysadmin for a major state university. And as a former university employee, I am overjoyed to see the U. of Nebraska taking this step. I hope that many more universities and colleges follow suit. Hell, I hope that *every one* of them does!

#

Re:Hmm, yourself!

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on March 08, 2007 05:48 PM
I used to be a sysadmin for a UK University and thats how we used to do things, pre-Microsoft. The Public Domain Library was really useful and everyone had to write their own code. Tougher learning curve but you did learn and quickly. Microsoft takes so much effort out of things that its dumbing down IT.

#

More Tripe From Tina The Hack

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on March 07, 2007 07:13 AM
We have this long article where there are repeated complaints about Microsoft and their products. More than half the article is devoted to general complaints about Microsoft and their products. The underlying theme seems to be a dissatisfaction with Microsoft SQL server and the lack of ease in integrating it across many untrusted domains. The article goes on to state "So Stephen decided to cut SQL Server loose, and began looking at a couple of open source business intelligence suites."

But the "solution" is cited as being Jaspersoft (a reporting tool suite for MySQL) and Joomla (a content management system recently forked from Mambo). No where does the article mention that they replaced Microsoft SQL server with MySQL if they replaced Microsoft SQL server at all! Thanks to Tina's keen reporting and writing skills, we can't tell!

Furthermore, if Microsoft SQL Server isn't integrated enough for your Microsoft Active Directory/LANMan domain environment then what the hell is? Certainly NOT MySQL! Certainly not Joomla! Perhaps Tina could have offered a tad more detail to improve the clarity and justify an alluded to solution that doesn't seem to follow logic.

When can we hope to have some accuracy and some clarity in these articles? Will we ever see substance and quality from Tina Gasperson? We can only hope that Amy Stephen will stop by and provide some in the comments.

#

Are you a MCSE or something?

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on March 07, 2007 08:16 AM
Quote:
------------
"Furthermore, if Microsoft SQL Server isn't integrated enough for your Microsoft Active Directory/LANMan domain environment then what the hell is? Certainly NOT MySQL! Certainly not Joomla! Perhaps Tina could have offered a tad more detail to improve the clarity and justify an alluded to solution that doesn't seem to follow logic."
------------

Umm...the article made it clear that Microsoft demonstrated no real interest in integrating MS SQL Server with other things at the University. So, SQL Server and the Craptive Directory weren't integrated University-wide anyway. Didn't you read the mention of "lots of untrusted domains"?

I would gladly toss out MS SQL Server for something like MySQL or PostgreSQL, depending on my specific database needs. MS SQL Server is a piece of crap and proprietary as hell. You use that, you might as well commit to what the University didn't want to commit to--Craptive Directory everywhere--and I don't blame 'em one bit for not wanting to do that.

#

Re:More Tripe From Tina The Hack

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on March 07, 2007 08:17 AM
Sounds to me like they were wanting to escape the Active Directory crackpipe. Microsoft wasn't willing/able to let that happen so buh-bye BillG.

#

Re:More Tripe From Tina The Hack

Posted by: Administrator on March 07, 2007 08:39 AM
Then again, Tina stands behind her words--unlike anonymous trolls.

#

Microsoft's attitude--that's what did it

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on March 07, 2007 08:09 AM
Yep, that's Microsoft. I don't blame this university one bit for switching. "You *will* lock-in to us, and if you don't like it, screw you," says Microsoft to its users. The entire company is permeated with this arrogance. They just want to own and control everybody with a "my way or the highway" attitude.

Heck they take that attitude even with K-12 institutions! They seem to love threatening audits to "persuade" decision-makers to upgrade to whatever the latest Windows/MSOffice version is. Disgusting....

Unfortunately, Apple is just as, if not more, arrogant than, Microsoft, so you "Cult of Mac" members are owned, too. Apple is just too damned proprietary and always has been. The only reason you don't see Apple threatening its users (yet) in like form to Microsoft is because of its tiny market share which it's desperately hoping to grow.

I use GNU/Linux. I use OpenBSD. I use OpenOffice.org, Firefox, and MPlayer. I use Free Software whenever possible. It is great. And I will *not* use anything from Microsoft except for their mice, which actually are pretty good and do follow publically- and freely-available standards.

#

Re:Microsoft's attitude--that's what did it

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on March 07, 2007 07:01 PM
It's funny when you institutions say they are looking into Linux, then Microsoft gives very heavy rebates.

But Apple have some open source software in Mac OS X.

Yes, I agree Microsofts mice are good.

#

osX, proprietary wrapper over open BSD

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on March 07, 2007 11:13 PM
Apple has managed to do a pretty good job of combining there proprietary X window manager and applications with the solid and open BSD base. For that, good for them.

The bound hardware/software combination they offer works well but it'll also be what keeps them in the minority of the market as a whole.

#

Re:Microsoft's attitude--that's what did it

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on March 08, 2007 12:49 AM
That's what happened in Newham, UK. One British town official actually stated, "we just wave the Linux flag and it brings prices down." Hence the expression, "pulling a Newham."

Steve Ballmer also tried that (unsuccessfully) in Munich, Germany. Microsoft is trying it now in China and many other countries who are looking hard at Linux and other FOSS. Venezuela's President Chavez, by contrast, is telling them to go screw. I don't agree with all of Chavez's policies, but I sure do agree with that one.

As for Apple, actually, Apple's Mac OS X is proprietary as hell; it is merely a closed, proprietary fork of FreeBSD. Sure, they include a few GPL'd apps (Samba, GCC, bash), but so does the SCO Group. Doesn't make the platform FOSS or the company trustworthy. Heck, Microsoft for years has distributed PERL and Regina REXX (both GPL'd) in the Windows Resource Kit. Doesn't mean we should trust them, and that also goes for Apple.

#

Re:Microsoft's attitude--that's what did it

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on March 08, 2007 02:38 AM
I agree.
But HeaderDoc, X11.app, XNU, Darwin and launchd is under APSL.
So I guess Apple is the lesser devil.

#

MS has always licensed good hardware to brand

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on March 07, 2007 11:10 PM
I think it's Logitech making MS branded mice still. If they could get IBM making MS branded keyboards they've have pretty solid hardware licensed.

Software is inhouse and we continue to see how well that works out for them.

#

Re:Microsoft's attitude--that's what did it

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on March 09, 2007 12:27 AM
The "MS Lock" really is a lock. Closed proprietary protocols that are either undocumented, or documented but you have to pay huge royalties and agree to massive restrictions. MS has spent a LOT of time and effort making Windows Very Very difficult to integrate with alternative technologies. This isn't really horrible, but if you go the MS route you just have to be prepared to be a 100% MS shop, and do everything the MS way. If that's not what you want, then you need to find alternatives, of which there are many to choose from at all different price points and levels of support.

I like Mac's too and have several at home to complement my Linux boxes, but Mac's fail in the enterprise on a number of levels, the most important is that they do not offer business class support for their hardware and software. In business, I have need for 24x7 4hr response time onsite support. I can't get that from Apple at any price.

At my daughters school, I'm on the technology committee, and we found that Mac's are not affordable at all - even with educational discounts (a whole $20 off a Mac Mini. Yeehaw. I can buy it in a non-apple store for less.)

#

Re:More Tripe From Tina The Hack

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on March 08, 2007 02:00 AM
Amen. She's been off the mark before, but at least it's available for public scrutiny. However, in this case, she's correct...*and* public.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-)

lker@cmosnetworks.com

#

I would like to see the code

Posted by: Administrator on March 08, 2007 06:12 AM
Interesting article. I wish technical details were given. Perhaps a follow up article...

#

This story has been archived. Comments can no longer be posted.


 
Tableless layout Validate XHTML 1.0 Strict Validate CSS Powered by Xaraya