Linux.com

Author Message
Joined: Apr 07, 2008
Posts: 1
Other Topics
Posted Apr 07, 2008 at 3:44:09 PM
Subject: Linux compatiblity to my hardware

I have the following desktop system:

Intel Pentium II 300 mhz mhz processor with 512k processor cache
MMX Seanix designed intel 440BX pentium II 100 mhz AGP motherboard

6 Gig hard drive
320 MB SDRAM
15 SVGA colour montior
32x speed internal EIDE CD-ROM
Creative labs PCI audio card
seanix stereo speakers
56k v.90 internal fax/modem
Matrox millenium G200 AGP Accelerator Video Card
Sony CD-Rom-R recordable 2x writes, 8x reads
HP 690C deskjet printer
mouse and keyboard.

a second Hard drive was installed a year later - 30 GIG internal Matrox hard drive was installed.

I would like to know which Linux I can install that will work with the above hardware. I would prefer not to partition the drive. I am presently using Windows XP SP2 Home on the this desktop.

I would like to install Linux for learning purposes, then once comfortable I would like to get a laptop with a high-end Linux installed.

Please provide a detail response in regards to which Linux system I can install. thanks.

Back to top Profile Email Website
proopnarine

Joined Apr 03, 2008
Posts: 399
Location:San Francisco

Other Topics
Posted: Apr 08, 2008 4:42:58 AM
Subject: Linux compatiblity to my hardware

Some of your hardware is aging, so I would recommend a graphics-light distro., such as Xubuntu, http://www.xubuntu.org/
It should recognize all your hardware, is very modern, but has a slightly lighter-weight GUI.

Take the red pill www.calacademy.org/blogs

Back to top Profile Email Website
Bob
Joined Apr 11, 2008
Posts: 93
Location:San Francisco, CA

Other Topics
Posted: Apr 11, 2008 7:01:31 AM
Subject: Linux compatiblity to my hardware

I tried quite a few distros on older, resource limited hardware like you describe and found several choices that worked quite well for my equipment, but with some limitations you might expect on a older computer. You will want to use a light window manager like Fluxbox, IceWM, or Xfce (or such) to minimize load rather than something like Gnome or KDE, which add features but too much overhead. Often issues can arise with older video cards, and choosing the VESA option during boot can help if you have difficulties.

The first 2 and last options work on almost anything (have never failed for me).
1)Damn Small Linux - basic, lightweight function initially, but you can add software as needed, ~meant to be run from CD/flash without installing but can install/convert to Debain
2) Puppy - more included with base install, expandable, also ~meant to be run from CD/flash without installing but can install and/or convert to Slackware 12, nicely functional out-of-the-box for many issues like web media,
3) Vector Linux - nice Xfce desktop, Slackware based system designed for older hardware, ~full desktop feel and
options, normally installed to HD
4) Xubuntu - xfce environment, wonderful support from community, slightly slower than Vector but safer for newbie,
normally installed to HD
5) Knoppix - great hardware support, ~meant to be run as live CD, full KDE envirnment so a bit heavy but can actually "work" if you want all the features

There are many others, but I have first-hand experience with the above.

Your experience with Linux on a system like you describe should be considered in comparison to the performance you'd expect from an OS that would normally run on it, like Win98. Linux will provide much better performance and with up-to-date software. On a new system you can expect performance at least comparable to Windows (generally better). Try a live CD on a recent system (which won't touch your current OS), though running from CD will not match the performance of an installed system - at least you can get an impression of function/features. Good luck!

Back to top Profile Email Website
Horizon
Joined Apr 02, 2008
Posts: 5
Location:Omaha, NE

Other Topics
Posted: Apr 11, 2008 6:54:37 PM
Subject: Linux compatiblity to my hardware

When I need a light system I really like using Debian - it's what all the *buntu's are based on, it's got excellent hardware support, and it's a breeze to set up. What I usually do is just install the base system - the plain command-line system, then I manually install a window manager. I usually use Gnome with a minimalist theme, but with your hardware you might want to try a couple different window managers, like XFCE or Fluxbox, as others have mentioned.

Edit: Debian's also very small, compared to something like ubuntu. I've just finished setting up a customized install of Debian in a virtual machine: It's Debian Lenny, with Gnome 2.2, Firefox 3 beta 5, and all the other regular apps I use - Rhythmbox, Liferea, Thunderbird, etc - and it's at 2.0GB total system size. I think the default Ubuntu install is something like 4GB, so it's a pretty large difference when you've only got a 6GB hard drive.
[Modified by: Horizon on April 11, 2008 12:56 PM]

Back to top Profile Email Website MSN AOL Instant Messenger
Tableless layout Validate XHTML 1.0 Strict Validate CSS Powered by Xaraya