Linux.com

Home News Business of Open Source Governance Should We Require That Open Source is Developed Openly?

Should We Require That Open Source is Developed Openly?

more than being open source

Roy Tennant wrote an interesting post about the definition of open source, in it he says:

"Open source" should mean exactly that and nothing more—the source code of the software is open, thereby allowing others to see it, understand it, and perhaps modify it. How the software itself is developed should be an additional aspect to the terminology, such as "openly developed open source."

 

read more

Read more at OpenSource.com
 

Comments

Subscribe to Comments Feed

Upcoming Linux Foundation Courses

  1. LFS201 Essentials of System Administration
    12 Jan » 30 Mar - Online Self-Paced
    Details
  2. LFD320 Linux Kernel Internals and Debugging
    13 Jul » 17 Jul - North Reading - MA + Virtual (GUARANTEED TO RUN)
    Details
  3. LFS426 Linux Performance Tuning
    13 Jul » 16 Jul - Virtual (Guaranteed to Run)
    Details

View All Upcoming Courses

Become an Individual Member
Check out the Friday Funnies

Sign Up For the Linux.com Newsletter


Who we are ?

The Linux Foundation is a non-profit consortium dedicated to the growth of Linux.

More About the foundation...

Frequent Questions

Join / Linux Training / Board