Â
Linux has many ways to make a personal DVD backup if you are comfortable using command line tools. If however you would rather use a graphical interface, there are three main contenders - K9Copy, AcidRip, and DVD::RIP. In order to read commercial DVDs, you must have the libdvdcss2 file to read the encrypted files. This file is not in the default repositories, instead you will have to find the repositories that hold the media packages that cannot be included in the installation packages for legal reasons. For Ubuntu that is the Medibuntu repository. For Fedora, you can find the library in the DAG repository.
Set as favorite
Share This
Email this
Comments (9)

Which is best?
written by Eric H, May 13, 2009
written by Eric H, May 13, 2009
I've used one or two of these in the past and they couldn't even rip some DVD movies as well as Handbrake could. Have these gotten better recently to be able to rip more of some of these newer movies that try to trick such programs? "Pursuit of Happyness" is one that comes to mind that just doesn't like to be backed up on anything it seemed at the time
Wine
written by Joe, May 13, 2009
written by Joe, May 13, 2009
I just use ripit4me and dvd decrypter under wine to rip the dvd to an iso file which vlc places. Works without a fuss.
Handbrake seems better so far
written by Spencer Fowers, May 13, 2009
written by Spencer Fowers, May 13, 2009
Working with my HTPC I've had to encode quite a few movies. I started with DVD:Rip but found that it messed up the audio on a few movies. AcidRip seemed to work much more consistently, but I still had to revert to command line encodings for certain...."difficult" DVDs. Finally, Handbrake is available for Linux, and the inherent multi-threading makes it a breeze (and very fast). Encoding a full movie in less than 30 minutes on a quad-core AMD Phenom XII.
Not to mention
written by Spencer Fowers, May 13, 2009
written by Spencer Fowers, May 13, 2009
The nice presets with Handbrake for encoding to ipod, saves me having to remember all of the containers and codecs and resolution settings I need.
Gathering More Data About Content for Linux.COM
written by Rodrigo Amorim, May 13, 2009
written by Rodrigo Amorim, May 13, 2009
Yes! I use libdvdcss2 too. What about you talk more about this in a large range of Linux distributions? For gathering more reliable data to Linux.COM, it will be better have more information about "similarities" in many Linux distributions, and than, make some comparison tables about.
What do you think about this idea? And of course, we can gather all information posted in comments too. All users can contribute to generate more and more knowledge. :-)
If you need help to gather all this information, you can count on me to do that. And than, try to publish in a tutorial's like section.
Thanks a lot! :-D
What do you think about this idea? And of course, we can gather all information posted in comments too. All users can contribute to generate more and more knowledge. :-)
If you need help to gather all this information, you can count on me to do that. And than, try to publish in a tutorial's like section.
Thanks a lot! :-D
Handbrake beats all of them :P
written by Ben Schmidt, May 13, 2009
written by Ben Schmidt, May 13, 2009
People who want to rip DVDs on Linux should first try out Handbrake, it is easily the best that I have used (and I've used pretty much all of them). If you're on Ubuntu, here's a short tutorial I wrote to get you up and running with Handbrake: http://spareclockcycles.wordpr...on-ubuntu/
...
written by Glenn Greenfield, May 14, 2009
written by Glenn Greenfield, May 14, 2009
Handbrake is a DVD to MPEG4 converter and to my knowledge is incapable of making a DVD backup. A backup is a copy of the original so that it will be preserved in case of failure of the original. By definition, this means that Handbrake (or any application that rips and re-encodes) does not make backups. A backup means a 1:1 copy (or at least in the case of DVD's shrinking 9>5), not a re-encoded version in another container because the re-encoded version is incapable of being used to restore your original.
In my experience nothing works better for ripping than DVD Fab & nothing works better for shrinking than DVD Shrink, ,both free to use and both work splendidly in WINE and there is not 1 single DVD that I can find that you cannot rip in this way. The last time I tried any of the apps mentioned by the author they all failed to rip the encrypted DVD's, especially the nasty Sony ARccOS DVD's. It would also be interesting to see if K9 can rip anything (relatively recent) from Disney - I'd be surprised if it could.
In my experience nothing works better for ripping than DVD Fab & nothing works better for shrinking than DVD Shrink, ,both free to use and both work splendidly in WINE and there is not 1 single DVD that I can find that you cannot rip in this way. The last time I tried any of the apps mentioned by the author they all failed to rip the encrypted DVD's, especially the nasty Sony ARccOS DVD's. It would also be interesting to see if K9 can rip anything (relatively recent) from Disney - I'd be surprised if it could.
...
written by ZogG, May 14, 2009
written by ZogG, May 14, 2009
script written for mplayer+x264 is making perferct rips for me, i just need to adjust SAR, crop, fps and filters i want to use
Handbrake as a backup solution
written by Ben S, May 14, 2009
written by Ben S, May 14, 2009
In response to #7, it is untrue that re-encoded content cannot be restored to a DVD. As luck would have it, I have also written up a howto on how to restore DVDs backed up with Handbrake with DeVeDe, a DVD creation tool available on Linux: http://spareclockcycles.wordpr...th-devede/ .
Regardless, you could still view the video file on your computer (which is where I watch most of my movies anyway), so you'd still have access to the content if your disk got scratched up. Re-encoding, imo, is superior to a straight backup (or a 9->5 backup) because you get almost no quality loss (especially if you use x264, it will easily be better than the quality of a 9->5 backup for the space) and you get much better compression levels, meaning less space is used per rip. The point is arguable, as you lose most of the extra stuff on the DVD, but I don't care much about that, and you could back it up as well if you really wanted to.
Regardless, you could still view the video file on your computer (which is where I watch most of my movies anyway), so you'd still have access to the content if your disk got scratched up. Re-encoding, imo, is superior to a straight backup (or a 9->5 backup) because you get almost no quality loss (especially if you use x264, it will easily be better than the quality of a 9->5 backup for the space) and you get much better compression levels, meaning less space is used per rip. The point is arguable, as you lose most of the extra stuff on the DVD, but I don't care much about that, and you could back it up as well if you really wanted to.
Write comment
You must be logged in to post a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.







