Manpage of SIGNAL

SIGNAL

Section: Linux Programmer's Manual (2)
Updated: 2016-03-15
Index
 

NAME

signal - ANSI C signal handling  

SYNOPSIS

#include <signal.h>

typedef void (*sighandler_t)(int);

sighandler_t signal(int signum, sighandler_t handler); 

DESCRIPTION

The behavior of signal() varies across UNIX versions, and has also varied historically across different versions of Linux. Avoid its use: use sigaction(2) instead. See Portability below.

signal() sets the disposition of the signal signumto handler, which is either SIG_IGN, SIG_DFL, or the address of a programmer-defined function (a "signal handler").

If the signal signumis delivered to the process, then one of the following happens:

*
If the disposition is set to SIG_IGN, then the signal is ignored.
*
If the disposition is set to SIG_DFL, then the default action associated with the signal (see signal(7)) occurs.
*
If the disposition is set to a function, then first either the disposition is reset to SIG_DFL, or the signal is blocked (see Portability below), and then handleris called with argument signum. If invocation of the handler caused the signal to be blocked, then the signal is unblocked upon return from the handler.

The signals SIGKILLand SIGSTOPcannot be caught or ignored.  

RETURN VALUE

signal() returns the previous value of the signal handler, or SIG_ERRon error. In the event of an error, errnois set to indicate the cause.  

ERRORS

EINVAL
signumis invalid.
 

CONFORMING TO

POSIX.1-2001, POSIX.1-2008, C89, C99.  

NOTES

The effects of signal() in a multithreaded process are unspecified.

According to POSIX, the behavior of a process is undefined after it ignores a SIGFPE, SIGILL, or SIGSEGVsignal that was not generated by kill(2) or raise(3). Integer division by zero has undefined result. On some architectures it will generate a SIGFPEsignal. (Also dividing the most negative integer by -1 may generate SIGFPE.) Ignoring this signal might lead to an endless loop.

See sigaction(2) for details on what happens when SIGCHLDis set to SIG_IGN.

See signal(7) for a list of the async-signal-safe functions that can be safely called from inside a signal handler.

The use of sighandler_tis a GNU extension, exposed if _GNU_SOURCEis defined; glibc also defines (the BSD-derived) sig_tif _BSD_SOURCE(glibc 2.19 and earlier) or _DEFAULT_SOURCE(glibc 2.19 and later) is defined. Without use of such a type, the declaration of signal() is the somewhat harder to read:

void ( *signal(int signum, void (*handler)(int)) ) (int);
 

Portability

The only portable use of signal() is to set a signal's disposition to SIG_DFLor SIG_IGN. The semantics when using signal() to establish a signal handler vary across systems (and POSIX.1 explicitly permits this variation); do not use it for this purpose.

POSIX.1 solved the portability mess by specifying sigaction(2), which provides explicit control of the semantics when a signal handler is invoked; use that interface instead of signal().

In the original UNIX systems, when a handler that was established using signal() was invoked by the delivery of a signal, the disposition of the signal would be reset to SIG_DFL, and the system did not block delivery of further instances of the signal. This is equivalent to calling sigaction(2) with the following flags:


    sa.sa_flags = SA_RESETHAND | SA_NODEFER;

System V also provides these semantics for signal(). This was bad because the signal might be delivered again before the handler had a chance to reestablish itself. Furthermore, rapid deliveries of the same signal could result in recursive invocations of the handler.

BSD improved on this situation, but unfortunately also changed the semantics of the existing signal() interface while doing so. On BSD, when a signal handler is invoked, the signal disposition is not reset, and further instances of the signal are blocked from being delivered while the handler is executing. Furthermore, certain blocking system calls are automatically restarted if interrupted by a signal handler (see signal(7)). The BSD semantics are equivalent to calling sigaction(2) with the following flags:


    sa.sa_flags = SA_RESTART;

The situation on Linux is as follows:

*
The kernel's signal() system call provides System V semantics.
*
By default, in glibc 2 and later, the signal() wrapper function does not invoke the kernel system call. Instead, it calls sigaction(2) using flags that supply BSD semantics. This default behavior is provided as long as a suitable feature test macro is defined: _BSD_SOURCEon glibc 2.19 and earlier or _DEFAULT_SOURCEin glibc 2.19 and later. (By default, these macros are defined; see feature_test_macros(7) for details.) If such a feature test macro is not defined, then signal() provides System V semantics.
 

SEE ALSO

kill(1), alarm(2), kill(2), killpg(2), pause(2), sigaction(2), signalfd(2), sigpending(2), sigprocmask(2), sigsuspend(2), bsd_signal(3), raise(3), siginterrupt(3), sigqueue(3), sigsetops(3), sigvec(3), sysv_signal(3), signal(7)


 

Index

NAME
SYNOPSIS
DESCRIPTION
RETURN VALUE
ERRORS
CONFORMING TO
NOTES
Portability
SEE ALSO

This document was created by man2html, using the manual pages.
Time: 22:27:44 GMT, June 20, 2016