Manpage of POSIX_MEMALIGN
POSIX_MEMALIGNSection: Linux Programmer's Manual (3)
NAMEposix_memalign, aligned_alloc, memalign, valloc, pvalloc - allocate aligned memory
#include <stdlib.h>int posix_memalign(void **memptr, size_t alignment, size_t size);void *aligned_alloc(size_t alignment, size_t size);void *valloc(size_t size);#include <malloc.h>void *memalign(size_t alignment, size_t size);void *pvalloc(size_t size);
Feature Test Macro Requirements for glibc (see feature_test_macros(7)):
posix_memalign(): _POSIX_C_SOURCE >= 200112L
- Since glibc 2.12:
(_XOPEN_SOURCE >= 500) && !(_POSIX_C_SOURCE >= 200112L) || /* Glibc since 2.19: */ _DEFAULT_SOURCE || /* Glibc versions <= 2.19: */ _SVID_SOURCE || _BSD_SOURCE
- Before glibc 2.12:
- _BSD_SOURCE || _XOPEN_SOURCE >= 500
(The (nonstandard) header file <malloc.h>also exposes the declaration of valloc(); no feature test macros are required.)
DESCRIPTIONThe function posix_memalign() allocates sizebytes and places the address of the allocated memory in *memptr. The address of the allocated memory will be a multiple of alignment, which must be a power of two and a multiple of sizeof(void *). If sizeis 0, then the value placed in *memptris either NULL, or a unique pointer value that can later be successfully passed to free(3).
The obsolete function memalign() allocates sizebytes and returns a pointer to the allocated memory. The memory address will be a multiple of alignment, which must be a power of two.
The function aligned_alloc() is the same as memalign(), except for the added restriction that sizeshould be a multiple of alignment.
The obsolete function valloc() allocates sizebytes and returns a pointer to the allocated memory. The memory address will be a multiple of the page size. It is equivalent to memalign(sysconf(_SC_PAGESIZE),size).
The obsolete function pvalloc() is similar to valloc(), but rounds the size of the allocation up to themultiple of the system page size.
RETURN VALUEaligned_alloc(), memalign(), valloc(), and pvalloc() return a pointer to the allocated memory, or NULL if the request fails.
- The alignmentargument was not a power of two, or was not a multiple of sizeof(void *).
- There was insufficient memory to fulfill the allocation request.
VERSIONSThe functions memalign(), valloc(), and pvalloc() have been available in all Linux libc libraries.
The function aligned_alloc() was added to glibc in version 2.16.
ATTRIBUTESFor an explanation of the terms used in this section, see attributes(7).
|Thread safety||MT-Unsafe init|
CONFORMING TOThe function valloc() appeared in 3.0BSD. It is documented as being obsolete in 4.3BSD, and as legacy in SUSv2. It does not appear in POSIX.1.
The function pvalloc() is a GNU extension.
The function memalign() appears in SunOS 4.1.3 but not in 4.4BSD.
The function posix_memalign() comes from POSIX.1d and is specified in POSIX.1-2001 and POSIX.1-2008.
HeadersEverybody agrees that posix_memalign() is declared in <stdlib.h>.
NOTESOn many systems there are alignment restrictions, for example, on buffers used for direct block device I/O. POSIX specifies the pathconf(path,_PC_REC_XFER_ALIGN)call that tells what alignment is needed. Now one can use posix_memalign() to satisfy this requirement.
posix_memalign() verifies that alignmentmatches the requirements detailed above. memalign() may not check that the alignmentargument is correct.
POSIX requires that memory obtained from posix_memalign() can be freed using free(3). Some systems provide no way to reclaim memory allocated with memalign() or valloc() (because one can pass to free(3) only a pointer obtained from malloc(3), while, for example, memalign() would call malloc(3) and then align the obtained value). The glibc implementation allows memory obtained from any of these functions to be reclaimed with free(3).
The glibc malloc(3) always returns 8-byte aligned memory addresses, so these functions are needed only if you require larger alignment values.
SEE ALSObrk(2), getpagesize(2), free(3), malloc(3)
This document was created by man2html, using the manual pages.
Time: 16:30:24 GMT, March 14, 2017 Click Here!