Linux.com

Feature

What DRM-free iTunes means for Linux users

By Nathan Willis on April 03, 2007 (8:00:00 AM)

Share    Print    Comments   

Apple will soon begin selling audio tracks through its online store that are playable on Linux systems -- but you still will not be able to purchase them on Linux.

At a press conference in London yesterday, Apple and music label EMI announced that starting in May the iTunes Store will offer tracks from select EMI artists in unencrypted AAC format, encoded at 256Kbps instead of the 128Kbps of standard iTunes Store fare. The unlocked, higher-bitrate songs will also be priced 30 percent higher than their restricted-format brethren.

On one hand, this is clearly welcome news for Linux users, since up until now the restricted M4P format of iTunes Store purchases made listening to them anywhere other than on a Windows or Mac machine an ordeal, to say the least. Unless there is some yet-to-be-disclosed wrinkle to the deal, most Linux audio players should be able to play the new AAC files through a free library like FAAD.

Projects like JHymn and QTFairUse periodically found a way to decrypt M4P files into vanilla AAC, but rarely was it a convenient solution. Often the decryption could only be done at real-time playback speeds or only on a platform with an official iTunes client. On top of that was the "arms race" factor -- Apple's periodic updates to the iTunes application or the store would break the decryption solution du jour.

The EMI-Apple deal also covers music videos, which will be made available for purchase in unencrypted format -- presumably standard MPEG4, since the currently offered video format is encrypted MPEG4. There should be no barrier to playing these files under Linux either.

On the other hand, accessing the iTunes Store to purchase such Linux-friendly material will not get any easier: only the iTunes application itself can access the store and process purchases. You can try running the Windows version of iTunes via WINE, but that is a gamble at best. I have done it successfully in the past, but between Apple's compatibility-breaking updates and WINE's complexity, it is not a solution that you can count on.

There used to be a working standalone iTunes Store client called SharpeMusique and a plug-in for Banshee based upon it, but both have fallen out of active maintenance. SharpMusique was released by Jon Lech Johansen, who has subsequently launched a commercial venture to try and license his reverse-engineered crack of iTunes' track encryption.

When the iTunes Store was exclusively selling encrypted content, permitting only the officially sanctioned client to interface with the store was imperative -- the client was responsible for encrypting the track with a unique user key after the raw, unencrypted version was downloaded. For unencrypted content, that is no longer necessary. Were Apple to let non-iTunes clients interface to the store it would still collect the revenue, and arguably more of it courtesy of more customers. Apple's bean-counters are certainly wise to that business opportunity, but cannot move on it so long as part of the store's inventory still requires encryption.

Hopefully, the EMI-Apple deal is a harbinger of things to come, not just on the unrestricted format front, but the unrestricted access front as well.

Share    Print    Comments   

Comments

on What DRM-free iTunes means for Linux users

Note: Comments are owned by the poster. We are not responsible for their content.

Yawn

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on April 04, 2007 02:52 AM
Did you read EMI's announcement? They are offering their non-DRM files to ALL internet music retailers, at a VARIETY of bitrates and in a VARIETY of formats, including MP3. iTMS is not the only game in town.

#

Wake up call

Posted by: Nathan Willis on April 04, 2007 04:22 AM
So when those other retailers actually roll out a store, we'll see how accessible it is for Linux users. Including which format they choose. Nobody said the iTS is the only game in town. But it is the one that made the announcement discussed, it is 70-80% of the for-pay digital track sales market (depending on whose spreadsheets you read), and it is the only retailer that has actually publicly committed to selling EMI's unencrypted content.

Nate

#

Agree; at that price, just buy the CD

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on April 04, 2007 04:16 AM
The average CD has between 8 and 10 tracks on it these days. That's between $10 and $12, which is right about the going rate for CD's. I've bought CD's for $7, I've bought two-packs for $19 (all these prices are USD, BTW).

Guess what? As long as you play your CD on GNU/Linux or Free/Net/OpenBSD--which doesn't support Sony-esque rootkit software--you already have non-DRM'd songs anyway. Just rip it into Ogg Vorbis format and stick it on a portable player that supports tracks in that format (there are several now). Given that you visit Linux.com, you *did* make sure to check for Ogg Vorbis support before you plunked down your cash, didn't you?

<a href="mailto:swalker@cmosnetworks.com" title="mailto">SW</a mailto>

#

Re:Agree; at that price, just buy the CD

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on April 04, 2007 09:44 PM
The question then is: are all the 8-10 songs on the CD, songs that you actually WANT?

Of course there is another pro for CDs - they come in lossless, full-quality audio. You don't get lossless from iTunes or any other site that provides music encoded in lossy formats.

So, at the end of the day, the balance is quality and cost. At least until all audio sites start providing audio in full-quality, lossless formats like FLAC.

If quality is important, then one would have to go with the higher cost of the CD (factoring in an additional cost for tracks included in the CD, but not wanted by the buyer!).

But, overall, I agree with you - we're certainly not getting more value for money buying music online at the moment.

#

Re:Agree; at that price, just buy the CD

Posted by: Administrator on April 06, 2007 05:45 AM
Mindawn (<a href="http://www.mindawn.com/" title="mindawn.com">http://www.mindawn.com/</a mindawn.com> is one site that does offer FLAC. Their options are OGG for $1.00 per song, or FLAC for $1.25 per song. (Usually -- songs longer than 10 minutes cost more, IIRC).

I've never used them, so I don't know if their selection's any good -- but it's the first online music store I'm aware of with FLAC offerings.

#

Re:Agree; at that price, just buy the CD

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on April 17, 2007 04:12 AM
Well, you are right to some extent, and I usually DO buy CDs, for the above mentioned reason, _but_...

1. Even most Linux users use iPod or PSP or something. We are not all that geeky to seek out one of the 0.05% of players supporting Ogg format.

2. Buying music online is quick and easy compared with going to the store.

3. Ripping and titling CDs is time-consuming and a pain.

4. Music videos...

#

Stop supporting Apple, they are no friend to Linux

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on April 06, 2007 12:14 AM
There are much better alternatives to the Apple monopoly iTunes for Linux users. Sites like emusic.com, Zunior.com sell DRM free mp3's WITHOUT that ridiculous lock-you-in software. I understand that Apple is the uber-cool poster child for rich kids and their hipster buddies, but they do nothing to help the Linux community and they leverage their monopoly in digital music the same way that Microsoft does desktop operating systems.

#

Re:Stop supporting Apple, they are no friend to Li

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on April 09, 2007 06:33 AM
Yes there are alternatives, but iTunes is the biggest one out there. Getting unencrypted songs in the iTunes store gets them in front of an awful lot of people. I think the community should treat the iTunes store as 2 seperate entities now, advocating one and criticising the other, that way the message about DRM can influence more people, namely those who don't want to change what they are currently doing. The best thing to do to stop DRM is not to get everyone to leave iTunes, but to give Apple hard figures of DRM vs. non-DRM songs purchased. That way it is their own data, from exactly their target audience, etc. To do that there should be advocacy of non-DRM iTunes over DRM iTunes. Personally I will be paying people to purchase songs for me, since I can't get a Linux client, which is something impossible to do legally before.

If Microsoft announced a Vista Ultimate Premium edition that was Free Software would you be telling people to avoid it in favour of Linux, BSD, etc. in the hope that a few of them will switch (the current situation), or would you take more effective action and advocate the Free version of Vista to those who were going to get one version of Vista anyway? Of course Vista is still full of crap, but that could be sorted out with access to the source.

PS: Sorry for the terrible analogy<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)

#

Re:Stop supporting Apple, they are no friend to Li

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on April 17, 2007 04:15 AM
Actually, Apple has been a friend to the open-source and open-standards communities in a lot of ways. They have made reference implementations available for many things they have created (i.e. bonjour), and so are in some sense much more open than Microsoft. Also, even with the DRMed music, they started with base standards like AAC and MPEG4 instead of coming up with proprietary codecs. Just putting a unix-based OS into the consumer mass-market helps us out in a lot of ways...

#

This story has been archived. Comments can no longer be posted.



 
Tableless layout Validate XHTML 1.0 Strict Validate CSS Powered by Xaraya