Linux.com
Everything Linux and Open Source
Survey: What Linux needs now
This list of the "Top 10 things Linux needs now" is a summation of the results of a small, highly unscientific poll I recently conducted on various newsgroups and mailing lists.
Most but not all of respondents are regular users of Linux. Some are die-hard Linux-only types. Some dual-boot to use "the right tool for the right job." Still others are merely curious about Linux. They are waiting for this or that to arrive before they even give it a try. There are also a few responses from folks who don't like Linux at all.
I have grouped the raw responses into categories. A vote for PhotoShop and for a tax program both went into Applications, for example. Games received enough votes to have a category of its own.
1st place: Applications
Almost a quarter of the responses wanted either more or specific applications. Some of those named specifically include Quark, PhotoShop, AutoCAD, and Microsoft Office. One person wanted a newer release of RealPlayer. There were also votes for types of applications, like OCR and tax, rather than for a specific product.
2nd place: Ease of use
Sixteen percent of the votes expressed the need for Linux to be easier to use. Specific suggestions were for better GUI applications for system configuration, more consistency between applications, and for Linux to have more fit and polish like the Mac OS X. Some even want it to be more like Windows.
3rd place: OS preloaded with desktop hardware
More than 10% of the responses suggested that what is holding Linux back now is not something missing from Linux so much as it is about availability. Microsoft would definitely agree, not just for Linux but for all its erstwhile competition over the years, from DR-DOS to OS/2 to BeOS. That's why it works so hard at keeping everyone else out of the preload arena. That's also why Massachusetts is charging in court that Microsoft has very recently (post-settlement) threatened reprisals against a major OEM to prevent it from offering Linux preloaded.
Here we are five years after the start of the Linux boom and HP has only recently become the first major OEM in the United States to offer Linux preloaded without forcing customers to pay a premium, as if they were paying for both Windows and Linux getting only Linux. This in spite of the demand evidenced by successful pre-load offerings by HP, IBM, and others in India, China, and Thailand. Now that there is finally a domestic American pre-load offering, it shouldn't take long to learn whether these votes are on the mark or not.
4th/5th place: Drivers and Games
Ten percent of the votes went for more or better relationships and drivers from hardware manufacturers. The most specific response was for 3-D video cards, but most simply wanted more and better across the board.
Ten percent also wanted more games. One wanted a "super game" exclusive to Linux, another wanted all the top Windows titles. The Linux gaming community may be small, but it is both vocal and growing.
6th place: Name recognition
Some took a larger view of what Linux needs. They want Linux to be more of a household term. Some said better name recognition will make management more willing to adopt Linux in the workplace. Others said it would prevent hardware manufacturers from ignoring the Linux market.
7th place: Easier installation of applications
Rather than being unhappy with a specific package management methodology, the votes in this category were for a universal solution. They want something that works well and works the same way across all distributions.
There were 10 responses tied for the 8th through 10th spots, each with one vote apiece. I played the pundit-card here and selected the final three positions. Among those not included are responses like "an end to pundits trying to divine what Linux needs next."
8th place: Better Microsoft Office file filters
We've had improvement here over the years, but the target keeps moving and we need to do the same.
9th place: Better documentation
This is always true, regardless of whether we are talking about Linux or Mac OS X or Windows XP.
10th place: Hot plug-and-play
I'm not sure how useful this would be, but it sounds sexy.
The list holds three surprises for me. First, I was surprised to see preloads ranked so high. I think that's a very astute observation. It's also very un-geeky. Maybe that's why it surprised me. Ditto for the awareness shown by the respondents of the value of name recognition. It's interesting to me that both of those are of the "rising tide lifts all boats" variety.
My biggest surprise came when I thought about what is not on the list. The great anti-Linux mantra is gone. It has disappeared. Not one of the more than 60 responses mentioned a need for easier installation of the operating system. Kudos to everyone who helped to make that happen. Let's hope the same thing happens to all the critical needs on the list.
Finally, I think it is worth pointing out that almost all of the items on the list are focused on Linux as a desktop platform rather than simply as a server. In this pundit's very humble opinion, the "not ready for the desktop" mantra will be the next one to disappear.
Joe Barr has been writing about technology for 10 years, and about Linux for five. His work has appeared in IBM Personal Systems Journal, LinuxGazette, LinuxWorld, Newsforge, phrack, SecurityFocus, and VARLinux.org. He is the founder of The Dweebspeak Primer, the official newsletter of the Linux Liberation Army.
- Write for us - and get paid! -