Late last year, Red Hat announced that it was discontinuing its consumer product line and replacing it with an unsupported, community-oriented developer platform, the Fedora Project. The announcement of the Fedora Project was taken by many in the wider community to mean that Red Hat was simply abandoning the home users and small businesses that had been its staple long before the existence of the Enterprise Linux platform.
However, shortly after the release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux version 3, Red Hat quietly made Red Hat Professional Workstation available. Initially buried deep within the Red Hat Web site, the company is only now putting greater emphasis on the product. When contacted, Red Hat made much the fact that they were not abandoning home users after all. "Professional Workstation is a derivative of Red Hat Enterprise Linux designed for the individual user," explained Michelle Chaperon, a spokesperson for Red Hat. "It is based on a year long release cycle that is ideal for those who do not wish to keep up with the rapid release cycle of Fedora."
Retailing at around $100, Professional Workstation comes with 30 days of phone and Web-based installation support, and access to Red Hat Network's Update module for one year. Although the product originally lacked a clear upgrade path, Red Hat announced earlier this month that users will be able to renew their subscriptions each year. However, considering the fact that Red Hat initially refused to disclose how it intended to proceed with users who deployed Professional Workstation, and given that the company has been gradually moving towards enterprise products for the last few years, how long this hybrid solution will be available for is unclear.
"It seems as if this is almost an orphaned offering," comments Stephen O'Grady, senior analyst at RedMonk. "Without a clear upgrade path and guaranteed support, it's difficult to say why anyone would choose this direction instead of Fedora -- after all, there's nothing to say that Fedora users have to keep pace with every single release."
Long-term viability aside, Professional Workstation is considerably more expensive than the consumer product line it replaced. Most former users of the consumer product line would have paid around $40 every 12 months as older products reached their end-of-life dates. However, Professional Workstation does include access to Red Hat Network's Update module, which would have cost $60 each year, so the actual difference in cost may therefore not be quite as pronounced as might be thought at first glance.
Inside Professional WorkstationProfessional Workstation includes nine CDs and a printed installation guide, all labeled as "Red Hat Linux Enterprise 3 WS" -- as becomes even clearer once the installation is under way, describing the product as a "derivative" of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3 WS is something of an exaggeration.
Desktop productivity users may hardly notice the difference between the two products. Generally, only minor package updates have been included over those that were available in Red Hat Linux 9. Although Ximian Evolution has been updated to 1.4.5, OpenOffice.org remains at an aged 1.0.2. A number of productivity applications, including GnuCash, have actually been removed altogether.
By contrast, small businesses that ran Red Hat Linux 9 on their servers certainly will notice what they're missing. A lot of the functionality that was available in Red Hat Linux 9 has been stripped out of Enterprise Linux WS, undoubtedly to force subscribers to the Enterprise Linux product line to move to the more expensive ES and AS platforms. This has naturally filtered down to Professional Workstation, which is missing server components such as BIND, OpenLDAP, DHCP, inews, and Kerberos 5. Professional Workstation does still include Apache, Samba, and NFS, and may therefore still be adequate for basic server needs, but small business users that had previously utilised services such as DHCP server will be forced to look at alternatives.
Support services are also lacking in Professional Workstation, again as the result of a deliberate decision on the part of Red Hat. While the functionality of Red Hat Network remains similar, Red Hat's Support on Demand service is no longer available at all, removing an important surety for small businesses.
Professional Workstation includes one year's access to Red Hat Network's Update module, to allow users to receive updates from Red Hat quickly and efficiently. The tools included with the Update module subscription are virtually unchanged from the old Basic subscription level, although access to ISO images is not available. Red Hat Network would be the one truly unique feature of Red Hat Professional Workstation were it not for the fact that the add-on services that would make the service distinctive, the Management and Provisioning modules, are only available to Enterprise Linux subscribers. As it is, Red Hat Network is just an update service, albeit one with a Service Level Agreement.
Beyond the initial 30 days of installation support, the support offerings available to users of Professional Workstation are poor. Prior to the discontinuation of the consumer product line, home users and small businesses were able to purchase basic support from Red Hat for $39.95 per incident. The Support on Demand service covered basic installation, configuration, and bug reporting, and represented an important safety net for small businesses using Red Hat Linux 9 in production environments. Professional Workstation's product description, on both the Red Hat Web site and the box itself, is at pains to point out that post-installation support is not available -- but is "standard in Red Hat Enterprise Linux." Small businesses that deploy Professional Workstation and require support will need to look to third parties for assistance.
Beyond Professional WorkstationFor many users, the time has come to move away from Red Hat. There is no compelling reason to deploy Red Hat Professional Workstation; it is a good deal more expensive than former Red Hat Linux consumer products, and at the same time offers few useful enhancements and, in some cases, comes with reduced functionality. Both home users and small businesses will be better served by investigating other solutions.
For home users, there are numerous options. The Fedora Project offers an attractive Red Hat-based desktop environment, with newer packages and a Red Hat Network-like update service, although without any support or Service Level Agreements. If you want to move away from Red Hat, or are looking for a supported solution, there are an impressive range of well-supported Linux distributions available, including general-purpose products such as SUSE Linux and Mandrake Linux, and desktop-oriented products such as Xandros Desktop, LindowsOS, and Lycoris Desktop/LX.
Small businesses with requirements that go beyond the basic features offered by Professional Workstation need to carefully evaluate the costs associated with either migrating to Red Hat Enterprise Linux or moving away from Red Hat products entirely. "While Fedora certainly enjoys relatively strong support in terms of development and supporting packages," comments O'Grady, "it's clearly not intended for the enterprise nor is it billed as such."
The costs associated with Red Hat Enterprise Linux are substantial. A subscription to Red Hat Enterprise Linux WS costs at least $179 per year, and a fully supported subscription costs $299 -- three times the price of Professional Workstation. Red Hat Linux Enterprise ES, which includes the missing server software, costs at least $349 per year, with a fully supported subscription costing $799.
Moving away from Red Hat is the better of the two options, says Rob Enderle, principal analyst for the Enderle Group. "Red Hat Enterprise Linux reflects a much higher level of aggressiveness on Red Hat's part," he says. "Their pricing may not stabilise for some time to come, as margins are still a problem for them."
Enderle argues that Linux is becoming more like Unix as it moves into the enterprise, and says that small businesses should seriously evaluate vendors with Unix experience. "Linux is only going to get more expensive going forward," he predicts. "Companies with a history in Unix understand the need for stability in pricing."
Novell and Hewlett-Packard are the best bets, according to Enderle. "Novell clearly has a lot of history, while HP the safest for a vendor with a hardware capability," he says.
Jason Prince is studying Computer Science at Australia's Macquarie University. His areas of interest include Linux in small businesses and education, as well as Customer Relationship Management (CRM).
Note: Comments are owned by the poster. We are not responsible for their content.
<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.. Rob Enderle, principal analyst for the Enderle Group
You left off CEO, janitor, Linux basher, and FOSS hater extrordinaire. The so-called Enderle Group is a one man shop, him. He, Didiot, and a few others are infamous for parroting whatever party line dribbles from the anus of the likes of Microsoft, SCO, etc. Their credibility approaches negative infinity.
Alternatively - maybe its time to give Debian, and its derivatives, a good look<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:-)
1) if you don't like GUI, what is it that makes RH better in your mind then Debian?
2) Mandrake's "fork" from RH took then a loooong way from the fork. Why don't you look at Mdk 9.2 and see for yourself how far they got? Also, Mdk *was* close to bankcrupcy but that is practically over and, besides, their products are not really affected (the advantage of GPL).
3) Mdk has not ad-ware or buggy code. Check the download edition of 9.2 and see for yourself.
4) Debian is really rock-solid and does provide you with anything, even if they are typically a littie "late" (timewise) compared to bleeding-edge distros. But they are also more stable. Last but not least: they are the ONLY ones whom we know for SURE will not sell out to the "korporate" world.
what do you think?
How about the fact that the whole of RHEL bar some graphics files is free software, so you can download the source and rebuild it yourself. Or if you can't manage that you can use something like <A HREF="http://www.whiteboxlinux.org/" TITLE="whiteboxlinux.org">Whitebox</a whiteboxlinux.org> where someone else has already done all the work for you.
disclaimer: the following is not a troll, but a sincere question.
Why would you go from RH to slackware or Suse and not consider Mandrake? As a RH developer, you are used to RPM-based distros. but Suse is even more corporate-oriented (read: big $$ oriented) than RH. As for slackware, well, its a good distro for sure, but much further form RH than Mandrake. I assumed you choose to contribute to RH because of its technology and not just because its "American", right?
Now, Mandrake is RPM-based, has urpmi, arguably superior tools to RH and has promised to keep a GPLed community version fully suported. Does that not seem attractive to you? Again - I really would appreciate if you, or any other disillusioned RH user/developer, would help me understand your choice.
Finally. if you want a distro *really* centered on a community, Debian comes to mind as a clear "no contest" winner. What do you think?
Thanks
> "Desktop productivity users may hardly notice the difference between the two products."
is a waste of bits. None of the things brought out in the later part of the article are remotely pertinent to RHPW. No one with more than two brain cells is going to run it as a business/production server. The comment -
> "The Fedora Project offers an attractive Red Hat-based desktop environment, with
> newer packages and a Red Hat Network-like update service, although without
> any support or Service Level Agreements."
is particularly annoying because you could actually replace "Fedora Project" with Debian, Mandrake, Xandros, Linuxos, Lycoris, or any of the other distros low-end offerings. There's no SLA's and minimal support for any of these.
The bottom line is that for anyone who has been using RHL up to version 9 the next logical step is Fedora. Fedora Core 1 is exactly what RH 10 would have been, only much more so. It's already got the infrastructure and capacity that took Debian years to achieve.
Linux is not going to be helped by the constant infighting and hatred that seems to be a part of the communities need to bash distros or desktops or even such trivial things as mail clients. All of the Linux distributions are excellent! They all have a place in the world and all do great things. We must stop bashing the very thing we are trying to promote!
What's sorely missing from the WhiteBox project is a completed and fully scripted guide to creating the ISOs yourself (the <A HREF="http://www.whiteboxlinux.org/howto.html" TITLE="whiteboxlinux.org">instructions</a whiteboxlinux.org> are absolutely woeful - it needs to be fully scripted [or fully documented where it isn't scriptable]). If I could create my own ISOs using, say, a Taroon beta setup to re-build everything from source, then I might have a play, but as it is, WhiteBox simply can't be "trusted".
Well nothing wrong with that, certainly if it makes RedHat a stronger and healthy company.
However do i smell a rat here?
Most if not all of the Red Hat Professional Workstation software components, allthough with RedHat varnish, are created and developed by people on the internet and NOT nessecarily on the payroll of RedHat. There is a discrepancy in that fact. And i predict that sooner or later RedHat would be better off to start contributing financially to the key open source softwareprojects which are inside their Enterprise labeled products. Certainly if some open source software projects might become the target of legal attacks.
Robert
Move on to another distro.
Posted by: Anonymous Coward on February 18, 2004 04:23 PM#