Linux.com

Feature

Sharing files between OpenOffice.org and Microsoft Office

By Bruce Byfield on July 28, 2005 (8:00:00 AM)

Share    Print    Comments   

Even if you're the most dedicated OpenOffice.org (OOo) user in the world, sooner or later you'll be asked to share files with someone using Microsoft Office. Some free software advocates refuse outright, or suggest outputting to HTML, PDF, or RTF formats, but these aren't always options -- especially if your boss is the one doing the asking. However, with a few preparations and a sense of what works and what doesn't, you can usually share files with Microsoft Office users with a minimum of headaches on both sides. Here's how.

In OpenOffice.org, you can use File > Wizards > Document Converter to convert all the Microsoft Office files in a folder to OOo format. If your main concern is content and you can ignore minor formatting errors, this wizard may be all you need. However, you can get better results if you plan your file sharing.

In OpenOffice.org version 2.0, importing and exporting Microsoft Office files is much easier than in earlier versions. However, many features of OOo are completely or partly unsupported in Microsoft Office. Many of these unsupported features are simply dropped when a file is converted. Your success in exchanging files depends largely on knowing which features are supported.

Preparing for sharing files

The first step in sharing files is to standardize on an export filter. OpenOffice.org includes export filters for Microsoft Word 6.0, 95, 97/2000/XP, and 2003 XML. If possible, standardize on the 97/2000/XP filter. While not perfect, it seems the most trouble-free filter, despite not being the most current format.

Next, if formatting matters, check that the fonts in your file are available to both OpenOffice.org and Microsoft Word. If they're not, your conversion target program will reformat the document, and you can expect repagination and the destruction of complex designs. Microsoft Word, which reformats using Times Roman of the same size, can be especially destructive of format. These problems are aggravated by the fact that GNU/Linux systems typically have free fonts that are not installed on Windows by default. However, they occur whenever you share files, no matter what operating system or programs are involved.

You can sidestep this issue by using only standard fonts such as Times Roman or Helvetica. If OpenOffice.org is installed on all machines, you can also use the Bitstream Vera fonts that are installed with it. The only drawback to these choices is that they are used so often that they may create a bland impression. If graphic design is important to your work, then the only solutions are either to install the fonts everywhere necessary -- first checking the font licenses -- or to share files in PDF format.

If you use non-standard fonts, remember that just because font files have the same name doesn't mean that they are identical. For example, there are literally dozens of fonts named Garamond, all allegedly based on the designs of the Renaissance typographer of that name, few of which have much in common except the name.

Now adjust the settings within OpenOffice.org itself. First, select all the options in Tools > Options > Load/Save > Microsoft Office. These options improve the handling of OLE Objects -- but only if you are using Writer in a operating system that supports OLE Objects, such as Windows. Second, check that all the options in Load/Save > VBA Properties are selected. OpenOffice.org doesn't run Visual Basic scripts, but, when these options are selected, they are preserved for later use when a file is opened in OpenOffice.org. If you neglect these, the people with whom you exchange files will be justifiably peeved to find their macros have disappeared after you have opened their files.

Paying attention to these matters should take a lot of the misery out of sharing files. Even so, if you want formatting perfection, you'll need to tweak your files. That tweaking will be infinitely easier if, as a final preparation, you format in both OpenOffice.org and Microsoft Office using character and paragraph styles instead of manually. Styles can be saved in a template, so you'll only need to set them up once. More to the point, character and paragraph styles also transfer successfully between Writer and Word, so you can use the styles to speed up your tweaking of the results.

Preparing to share files between Writer and Word

>Before sharing text documents, open a blank Writer document and check the options available in OpenOffice.org at Tools > Options > OpenOffice.org Writer > Compatibility. Some of the options in this window are for compatibility with recent versions of StarOffice, the proprietary version of OpenOffice.org, but about half are for Microsoft Word compatibility. Several set OpenOffice.org to add spacing between lines and around objects as Microsoft Word does:

  • Add spacing between paragraphs and tables (in current document).
  • Do not add leading (extra space) between lines of text.
  • Add paragraph and table spacing at bottom of table cells.
  • Consider wrapping style when positioning objects.

If you are importing Microsoft Word files, then select "Add paragraph and table spacing at tops of pages (in current document)" as well. Whether importing or exporting, you should also select "Use printer metrics for document formatting" if all machines have access to the same model of printer or to any PostScript printer. The option provides a common standard independent of the software.

When you have set the options, click the Use as Default button to save your choices as the default settings. Some of these settings are only for the current document, so save the current document using File > Template > Save so that you don't have to adjust the settings each time you start a document that will be opened in Microsoft Office.

Sharing files between Writer and Word

With the options for file-sharing enabled, you can generally exchange text documents with few problems. The text itself usually translates with only minor problems. The difficulties are likely to be caused by inserted objects or page-level formatting.

Character and paragraph formatting, whether set manually or with styles, usually transfers easily. Provided the fonts used are available for each program, characteristics such as font size, effects, and positioning are trouble-free. Even rotation of characters and changes in font width transfer without difficulty. The same is true of basic paragraph characteristics, such as line spacing and tabs. OpenOffice.org's list styles are not supported in Microsoft Word, but paragraphs associated with a list style in Writer will use the same type of list in Word. The only difficulties with paragraphs arise with features unsupported by Microsoft Word, such as custom hyphenation, page breaks, and last lines of justified paragraphs. These items are dropped in Word in favor of its default settings. The result may be minor differences in line and page breaks -- usually amounting to no more than a single line, if that.

In earlier versions of OpenOffice.org, numbered and bulleted lists were a problem in conversion, mainly because Writer and Word used different default fonts for bullet lists. In version 2.0, these problems are greatly alleviated. Special characters used as bullets still cause problems, since OpenOffice.org uses Unicode characters while Windows uses ANSI characters, but even advanced options such as text before or after a bullet or number are now transferred cleanly. The greatest problem with lists seems to be the use of Tools > Outline Numbering, which prevents altogether your saving a file in Microsoft Word format.

Many fields are also trouble-free, including page numbers, cross-references, and tables of contents. In fact, even custom table of content entries, such as ones with the page number first, open successfully in Microsoft Word. Other fields, such as those based upon file attributes, such as word count, are converted to text, which might cause problems if the file is being passed back and forth for revision. Fields that do not work at all include all of those for conditional text, such as hidden text, hidden paragraphs, and input lists. Hidden text simply disappears in Microsoft Word, while hidden paragraphs are revealed and input lists are frozen on the current selection.

Inserted objects have mixed results when you share files. Many common objects transfer without problems. Hyperlinks transfer successfully, unless attached to a frame, and so do notes and revision changes.

Other objects have mixed results. The settings for graphics, including size, anchor, and alignment jump the gap smoothly except when Align as Character is set in Writer -- in which case, the graphic simply does not appear in Word. Complex table and border settings generally transfer smoothly, but a nested table does not survive when the file is opened in Word. Similarly, simple shapes made with the drawing tools carry over, but callouts or complicated diagrams may not. Footnotes are transferred, but generally cause repagination, so end notes seem a better alternative for a shared document.

A handful of objects do not convert at all. They include animations and embedded OpenOffice.org files. On GNU/Linux, OLE objects in an Microsoft Word document do not convert either, since -- despite the listing for OLE Objects under Insert > Object -- the operating system does not support them.

Other items that do not transfer successfully are mostly concerned with page layout. Since Microsoft Word has no sense of the typographic page, this failure is only to be expected. Margins for page styles are maintained, but the page styles themselves are lost. So are all except the first header and footer, and any borders or shadows given to them. Similarly, text frames are transferred, but without most of their settings. Sections fail even more seriously, being treated as page break markers, and dropping password protection and hidden settings. Both frames and sections with multiple columns often display only the first few lines.

As for master documents, they can be neither imported nor exported.

Sharing files between Calc and Excel

The main compatibility problem between Calc and Excel spreadsheets are functions. Basic functions, such as SUM, AVERAGE, and MAX generally cause no problems. However,with more advanced functions, check the online help before using them. Although Calc is designed to be highly compatible with Excel, both spreadsheets have functions that the other lacks. In a few cases, Calc may have arguments that Excel lacks. In other cases, Calc may have two similar functions: one for general use, and a second for Excel compatibility. For example, WEEKNUM calculates the week number of a given data based on the ISO 6801 standard, while WEEKNUM_ADD does the same calculation in an Excel-compatible format.

As in Writer, objects in Calc have a mixed record. Charts in particular may not survive translation. Page and cell styles don't survive, although the formatting of cells that use the styles generally translates faithfully.

Sharing files between Impress and PowerPoint

The PowerPoint filter seems far more reliable in OpenOffice.org 2.0 than in earlier versions. In particular, the frequent inability to transfer a background graphic in a master slide has been eliminated. Slide transitions are also exported more reliably, although you should experiment with them to check which ones don't work. However, animated GIFs created in Impress still do not open in PowerPoint. Similarly, instead of creating a complicated diagram directly in Impress, you will probably have more success doing the diagram in Draw, then exporting it into a common graphic format.

When importing from PowerPoint, you need to be aware that many of the options for sound cannot be used in Impress. Although version 2.0 supports a much vaster array of sound formats than earlier versions, Impress still lacks tools for recording sounds and narration, and for playing CD tracks with a slide. Sound in Impress remains limited to individual slides. Nor can Impress handle PowerPoint's Pack and Go or Package for CD, which bundles up a slide show and all its associated graphics and fonts for easy transportation between machines

Sharing Draw files

>Draw's native formats, .odg and .sxd, are not supported by Microsoft Office. Fortunately, Draw files export to most common graphic formats, including .png, .gif, and .jpeg. All these formats can be viewed in a Web browser or inserted in a blank Microsoft Office document. Keep the original, and export as needed.

Conclusion

This has not been an exhaustive list of what works and what doesn't when exchanging files with Microsoft Office. No such list exists. The online help does highlight potential problem areas, but the current Office does not take the changes in OpenOffice.org version 2.0 into account, and is unnecessarily paranoid.

Still, if there's a secret to sharing files between the two office applications, it comes down to three words: Keep it simple. The more basic the formatting, the more likely that the exchange of files will be trouble-free. Objects, page design, and any styles except paragraph and character styles are especially likely to cause problems.

Understand, too, that, except in the simplest cases, the process is unlikely to perfect. Sharing files has always been a weak side of office programs. Making import and export filters is too expensive for commercial companies, and often too unglamorous for free software developers. The situation isn't improved, either, by the fact that Microsoft Office formats are proprietary, often altered between versions, and require reverse engineering.

Under the circumstances, the fact that sharing files raises problems isn't surprising. Often, what's surprising is that you can share files at all.

Bruce Byfield is a computer journalist who writes regularly for Linux.com.

Share    Print    Comments   

Comments

on Sharing files between OpenOffice.org and Microsoft Office

Note: Comments are owned by the poster. We are not responsible for their content.

Thanks.

Posted by: fmcgowan on July 29, 2005 12:24 AM
I routinely use OOo in an organization that has "standardized" on MS products. I frequently move text files in both directions with little difficulty, but they are generally fairly simple memo-style documents. I tend to export more compicated documents in PDF form.

Yesterday, I used Calc to format data bound for Excel from a database. Because I was dealing with a novice user with an *old* platform (Win95), I exported to every supported Excel format... I probably won't know this story ends for a while - it took about 1 1/2 months before I heard she couldn't import what I gave her last time...

The information here will help with slightly more complicated documents.

#

No hissy fit this time?

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on July 29, 2005 12:45 AM
What, you aren't pissing on your readers <a href="http://www.newsforge.com/articles/05/07/19/1824234.shtml?tid=149" title="newsforge.com">like last time</a newsforge.com>?



Woke up on the right side of the bed this morning? Why aren't you tearing into your readers like the last column?



Come on, where's the sport in a plain, dull article that doesn't attack its readers?

#

OT: Stop complaining

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on July 29, 2005 01:16 AM
You complained when the author did something you didn't like. The author changed. Now you complain that he took away what you had complained about.

Looks to me like you just want to complain.

#

Exactly.

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on July 29, 2005 02:04 AM
So why doesn't the OP just STFU?

#

OOo Outline Numbering

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on July 29, 2005 01:47 AM
Unfortunately, the poor conversion of list numbering and outline formatting between Writer and Word is a showstopper for me when working at home, as I found out last week. Since about 85% of what I write (outside of e-mails) needs outline formatting or some sort of numbering, and the office I work for is locked into MS junk, I need to log out of Fedora Core, and boot up Windows when I work at home or on the train writing specifications, etc.
I have not found a similar problem with Calc, as I have found it easy enough to copy, paste (and sometimes tweak) the simpler macros between MS's VBA and OOo's Star BASIC. The more compliocated ones take a bit of re-writing, but I've managed to make compatible libraries for most of them.

#

Re:OOo Outline Numbering

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on July 29, 2005 03:36 AM
Geez - never heard of www.codeweavers.com?

#

Re:OOo Outline Numbering

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on July 29, 2005 07:43 AM
using codeweavers cxoffice isn't the point... I can run M$Office under wine quite happily, but I'd be even happier if I were M$ free.

#

So, OOo really isn't very MSOffice compatible...

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on July 29, 2005 02:03 AM
Wow. That's a whole lot of configuration changes necessary to achieve what is still probably spotty compatibility with MS Office. Not to mention those changes are for the future version of OOo (current release is 1.1.4).

So, um, why aren't these configuration settings defaults? And when is OOo either going to get MS Office compatibility right, or stop lying to people about how interoperable their software is?

#

Re:So, OOo really isn't very MSOffice compatible..

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on July 29, 2005 02:46 AM
I don't think that full MS office compatibility should be the main aim for OO developers. Is it important? Certainly! but the idea should be to have something better. OO does interoperate with MS office quite nicely, but not a 100%. Any way, MS will never release the complete file format specs, so the MS word compatibility we currently get with OO is excellent.

If you are not satisfied with OO, ask for a refund!

R-dish

#

My experience leads me to disagree

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on July 29, 2005 04:15 AM
I don't see any evidence of lying on the part of the OO.o team, as with my (rather complex) MS Word documents with embedded images, etc., I've yet to have a problem. I've been using OO.o since the beta build 638, and StarOffice 5.2 before that. In version 1.0.x, there were a few formatting differences with bullets that I recall, and one time I had to re-do a graphic, but this was nothing that I couldn't fix in less than a minute. Version 1.1.x was much better. The beta of OO.o v2.0 also seems quite good.

Based on your post, it sounds like you are a frequent user of OO.o. If you are running into compatibility issues with some of your documents, you are encouraged to let the OO.o development team know. This is what I did whenever I ran into an issue and is what Free and Open Source Software is all about.

Fortunately, Microsoft is moving to XML and, unless they try to play the patent lawsuit threat here, "secret" proprietary file formats will become a thing of the past. The sooner, the better.

#

Not Free or Open XML

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on July 29, 2005 04:27 AM
"Fortunately, Microsoft is moving to XML and, unless they try to play the patent lawsuit threat here, "secret" proprietary file formats will become a thing of the past."

The MS XML format is neither Free nor Open.

- Not Free: The no cost patent license denies license transfer which is incompatible with GPL and other Freedom-based licenses.

- Not Open: The XML format contains binary "blobs" or binary members the contents of which are not documented. So they can still hide things and make reverse engineering necessary and difficult, even if the patent was not there. The secret is still secret.

The MS XML format was a marketing coup for MS. Prevent license transfers and hide format information while telling the world the format is Open.

Bah!

#

Go whine at Microsoft

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on July 29, 2005 09:50 AM
for locking up your data in closed, proprietary, continually-changing formats. Then go whine at yourself for being a schmuck who uses microshaft products. Then write a nice thank-you letter to the Open Office team for working so hard for interoperability. Then dope-slap yourself 'cause you deserve it.

#

Re:So, OOo really isn't very MSOffice compatible..

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on July 29, 2005 10:22 AM
A lot of the differences were things that the cludgey msoffice doesn't even have. Are you suggesting oo needs to cobble itself to bring itself down to the lower standard?

When is ms office going to get it's act together and be compatible with ANY standard? It still can't read any of the good wordprocessors' file's. What is wrong with the idiots at ms? How many years do they need?

And, finally, when is msoffice going to work on proper operating systems. Every other organisation on the planet seems to have cracked the cross-platform thing. Again, what is wrong with the ms developers. Is it too hard for them? Don't they know where to look for the information?

I am all for giving people a chance, but enough is enough, it isn't THAT difficult!

#

Re:So, OOo really isn't very MSOffice compatible..

Posted by: richlv on August 02, 2005 05:32 PM
actually, oo.org has several times 'downgraded' to mso level (fontwork, position remmembering, though latter has been rstored in a way).

so far fontwork seems to be the biggest crippling that has occured because of mso compatibility...

#

And MSOffice isn't very OpenOffice compatible

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on July 30, 2005 04:21 AM

When is Microsoft going to get OOo compatibility right?

#

Re:And MSOffice isn't very OpenOffice compatible

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on August 13, 2005 05:14 AM
When there's demand. Money talks, moron.

#

i hate openoffice

Posted by: brendan0powers on July 29, 2005 08:09 AM
3!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... i have to make this message longer because aparently 3! has to many capital letters:)

#

Re:i hate openoffice

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on July 30, 2005 04:23 AM
Wow, what an informative post. Do you hate it because it's there, or because you're you?

#

Re:i hate openoffice?

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on August 01, 2005 03:25 PM
You shoud hate the people, who put new incompatible and close<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.doc formats in every new M$ office. It must be really hard to write a program compatible with an another, its programmers want to make it incompatible<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:) Don't support MS only because they use isolationalistic politic!
OO rulez! F.D.

#

same trouble transfering from MSOffice to MSOffice

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on July 29, 2005 06:24 PM
had the same troubles (fonts, formatting, etc.) transfering files from one instance of MSOffice 2003 SB to another instance of MSOffice 2003 SB<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... different options selected, different fonts installed etc.<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... nothing new in the office world

all the word processing, spreadsheet, presentation software packages are evil<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:) but some are less expensive than others<nobr> <wbr></nobr>...

#

Re:same trouble transfering from MSOffice to MSOff

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on August 24, 2005 05:19 PM
YOU ARE RIGHT! but when you send someone a word file you oblige him to buy a microsoft product (that he has too install), when you send someone an openoffice file you just oblige him to download a freeware....

#

Not worth if it you work with MS Office files

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on July 30, 2005 05:25 AM
OO.org wastes too much time with formatting issues. For example I work for a large non-profit. We have to pull our employee manual templates off the intranet, customize them to suite our needs and send them back to be checked an approved. This is a fairly basic 40 page MS office document with bullets, headers, footers, and lots and lots of text.

OO.org just mangles it too much to be worth it. Sure 98% of the text comes over, just no in the right place. Am I expected to spend hours pushing text around trying to get it to look the way its suppoed to. In the "real" world its simply not acceptable to send a file to someone that has screwed up formatting. They won't just "deal with it" or "spend a few moments fixing the formatting". They'll will however wonder what the hell is wrong with you and why you can't do your job properly.

If you need to work with Word docs on a regular basis you should avoid OO.org at all costs. It just can't get it right and you'll end up spending forever reformatting. Even worse you'll finally get it right in OO.org and then it will look scrwed up in MS Office. And of course while you can take steps like above to minimize exports issues, the person your sending docs to will still have formatting issues.

I btw don't blame the OO.org developers in the slighest. This is Microsoft's mess and the entire world is the worse for it. But when it comes to interacting with others you need a program that can properly read and write to<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.doc files. Anything less isn't acceptable. For that reason OO.org will continue to be unuseable anywhere you have to receive and send MS Office files.

#

btw

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on July 30, 2005 05:31 AM
I forgot to mention that if you don't ever send or receive MS Office files OO.org works well. Schools for example where kids have to use computers in a lab to do work or even learn how to use Office suites can greatly benefit from OO.org. And small businesses where you need a full office suite but don't interact with other business via email can do well by looking into OO.org

If it was up to me MS would be forced to properly document its Office files. That should have IMHO been part of the DOJ "settlement" IMHO. But it wasn't so make sure you realize that you will have formating issues if you try and replace MS Office with OO.org.

#

Re:Not worth if it you work with MS Office files

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on July 31, 2005 06:47 AM
As long as you continue to deliberately support
the brokeness of M$ Office by capitulating to its
use, YOU are part of the problem.

If you have the guts to try to make the world
a better place, then YOU can begin by telling the M$
lusers that _their_ versions are the broken ones
and that _they_ should be accomodating you.

If you're too weak to do that, then you're really
not very much of a person, and perhaps you really
belong with all the obedient little mindless sheep
who are slaves to M$. Oh, don't worry: those
who are superior to you will continue the fight
for you, since you're not up to the task.

#

Re:Not worth if it you work with MS Office files

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on July 31, 2005 01:30 PM
Really it's posters like you that make our job in the project harder. Don't insult the man, just offer suggestions. Maybe one of them could be try the beta version and see if it works better.

Adam

#

Re:Not worth if it you work with MS Office files

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on August 01, 2005 09:59 PM
Since when did it become more important to offend your customers, your superiors, and your coworkers than to get your work done in a manner that they can use?

If you're the king of your own company and you don't trade documents with customers (or just like making them mad), then be as obnoxious as you want. But last time I checked, most people were in business to make a profit, and you don't do that by fighting with your coworkers and your customers.

You do what's necessary to serve those you're there to serve -- even if you think you know better.

#

Re:Not worth if it you work with MS Office files

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on August 01, 2005 09:50 PM
I always reject documents sent to me in MS Office formats and ask that the sender use a more portable format. About half the time I get a very confused response from someone who doesn't know that non-MS formats exist, but I'm the customer, so I'm right. I think that it's reasonable that MS users should start to feel the pain they've caused the rest of us.

#

How about exporting the manual as a PDF?

Posted by: fmcgowan on August 03, 2005 02:34 AM
That is how I manage this sort of thing as often as I can. I import the MS-Office file (remove it from the network, if possible), format as required for OOo and export as a PDF.

In the case of a manual, the general users cannot be permitted to change it, anyway. If I place it on the intranet as a PDF, the users can read it using their browser or the Acrobat Reader and I can edit it as an OOo ODT (I'm using the v2.0 beta) so everybody is happy.

Documents that everyone is permitted to edit are another story. I have been "campaigning" for users to edit documents as rich text or even get them to switch to OOo using future readability of the document as the main argument. If you use RTF for interoperability, you should be aware that MSO has "extended" this standard, so this is not a perfect approach, either.

#

What about saving Writer work as .doc from start?

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on August 03, 2005 12:39 AM
As someone who's not familiar with Writer yet, this sounds like an excellent in-depth comparison of moving files between Writer format and Word formats. But if I create files that must be available to MS users, I would probably want to save them in MS format at creation. If you start with a<nobr> <wbr></nobr>.doc file and stay in that format, do you still have the same problems? Do you have other problems?

#

Sorry Verry Bad Move.

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on August 12, 2005 08:50 AM
OpenOffices Doc Importer works almost perfectly.
OpenOffices Doc Exporter is another question.

Save as Doc requires a re open to check that is save right. Most of the time if it looks right from the Openoffice Doc Importer its right.

Closed format docs and the Exporter still needs alot of work.

PDF is the best fix if the document never needs edit again.

Also major point that is alway overlooked Reasons for using OpenOffice are not always because you need Microsoft Compad. Most Common reason is good working PDF Export Either PDFExtentend for OpenOffice 1.1.4 or OpenOffice Betas Export. Yep just for Word to PDF conversion that works OpenOffice is a great cheep tool.

Yep it creates bookmarks making a 40 page document simple to use in a unchangable state.

Yes the damage will drive you nuts if you create DOC formats under OpenOffice.

Companys need to smell the end of MS Office.

Please note OpenOffice 2.0 and OpenOffice 1.1.5(when its released)Will support the odt standard docformat for word processing. Question will Microsoft. This is important because all OpenSource word processors have decided on one format. Yep abiword kword and Openoffice will use the one fileformat.

You really should not store stuff in a non standard format what will you do in the future. MS Works 4.5 comes to mind. Its nice fun to open these documents today. Yet Opening Unix man or info files from over 20 years ago no problems.

Open Standard formats means you will be able to read the documents as long as you have the standard. Closed Standard formats Mean you will only be able to read the document if someone works out the file format or the company supports it I don't like the risks. Also Closed Standards can be changed without telling anyone. I have a converter and it breaks because the creator adds a new feature and tells no one.

#

Sharing files between OpenOffice.org and Microsoft Office

Posted by: Anonymous [ip: 122.162.82.53] on September 18, 2007 10:24 AM
not a friendly web site

#

Sharing files between OpenOffice.org and Microsoft Office

Posted by: Anonymous [ip: 122.162.237.146] on February 26, 2008 05:12 AM
Hi,
Please give me the way how we convert OpenOffice.org file to Microsoft Office.

Thanks
Raliey
Raliey@a-zwebdir.com

#

This story has been archived. Comments can no longer be posted.



 
Tableless layout Validate XHTML 1.0 Strict Validate CSS Powered by Xaraya