Linux.com

Feature

Among Linux music players, Banshee really wails

By Kush Parmar on February 22, 2006 (8:00:00 AM)

Share    Print    Comments   

Over the last few years, the number of Linux music players has mushroomed, providing a variety of applications to suit different people. I've tried several Linux music players since I started using the operating system, but none of them were perfect for my requirements. I recently tried out an increasingly popular music player, Banshee, and have found a new personal favourite.

Written using GTK# and Mono, Banshee is currently only at version 0.10.4, but I've found it suitable for my everyday use and haven't encountered any stability issues at all.

Ease of installation varies across Linux distributions, but the project's Web site provides good documentation. The popularity of the project is increasing, and as a result the latest version of openSUSE has Banshee as a default music player. Installing Banshee will be easier on some distributions as Mono becomes a standard; until then, the instructions on the site should be sufficient.

Starting the application opens the Import Music window, which offers two options for importing your music: manual or automatic. Once the import process completes, you can play your music hassle-free.

The user interface feels right at home on the GNOME desktop (see Figure 1); the player integrates beautifully, with a tray icon that enables you to perform functions such as pausing and switching between tracks and hiding the player. The intuitive interface makes it easy to get to the program's functions. Writing CDs is a breeze with a button located at the upper right of the main window, which you can see by clicking here.

Banshee is perfect for managing your entire music collection, and particularly items stored on iPod music players (see Figure below). The software allows you to carry out many tasks in ways similar to Apple's iTunes, including playing music directly from the device and creating playlists with your songs. Banshee supports a wide variety of codecs, including Ogg Vorbis, FLAC, and MP3. The player read ID3 tags perfectly for my music collection, and sorting through the tracks -- comprising several file formats -- was incredibly easy.

iPod Properties

If you have an enormous music collection, you'll appreciate the search bar, which can filter searches by song name, artist name, or album title. I love the Fullscreen option, which runs the application in a full window, covering the GNOME panels and removing the window borders.

Banshee's plugin architecture is fantastic, allowing external developers to add even more functionality to the application. One plugin worth mentioning is the Audioscrobbler plugin, which allows users to build up a profile of their musical tastes by using the popular online service.

My only annoyance with the player is with the excessively large amount of blank space at the top of the window; when right-clicked, this area provides a menu that displays useless options such as "copy" and "paste," which are grayed out.

I've found Banshee to be a thoroughly satisfying player. Your requirements for a music player may differ from mine, but give Banshee a shot.

Share    Print    Comments   

Comments

on Among Linux music players, Banshee really wails

Note: Comments are owned by the poster. We are not responsible for their content.

Amarok seems to be extremely comparable

Posted by: Fletch on February 23, 2006 08:50 PM
Seeing that both Amarok and Banshee both take the idea of IPod integration along with an interface that is similar to Itunes, and that both use GStreamer, I don't see the differences enough to warrant using Banshee over the other. The only issue I had with Amarok is it modified my playlists that I made within XMMS which it should not do. Perhaps this was a bug at the time, but that gives me the feeling of "once you have converted to Amarok, you can't go back", and so I don't like feeling "locked in" to a piece of software (although realistically this is a bit exagerated). After looking at what the author had to say about Banshee, I would choose Amarok over Banshee. Furthermore, I'm not so sure the authod did a good enough job at explaining what the other players did not do to suffice, other that he couldn't find one that did what Banshee could do . Another, "I like red because it's my favorite color" article.

#

Hmm

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on February 22, 2006 11:59 PM
Yeah, Banshee seems like a good music player.

XMMS is other player, and xmms2 is under developement. There is also Beep Media Player, which is a fork of XMMS.
* <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XMMS" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XMMS</a wikipedia.org>
* <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XMMS2" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XMMS2</a wikipedia.org>
* <a href="http://www.xmms.org/" title="xmms.org">http://www.xmms.org/</a xmms.org>
* <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beep_Media_Player" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beep_Media_Player</a wikipedia.org>

Another good player is wxMusik, it has some similarities to Banshee.
* <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WxMusik" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WxMusik</a wikipedia.org>
* <a href="http://musik.berlios.de/" title="berlios.de">http://musik.berlios.de/</a berlios.de>

#

Re:Hmm

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on February 23, 2006 05:59 AM
Don't forget BMPx, the development branch of BMP. SVN snapshots and screenshots are quite impressive.

<a href="http://bmpx.beep-media-player.org/site/BMPx_Homepage" title="beep-media-player.org">http://bmpx.beep-media-player.org/site/BMPx_Homep<nobr>a<wbr></nobr> ge</a beep-media-player.org>

#

Why?

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on February 23, 2006 12:36 AM
How is this really any different from Rhythmbox/Gstreamer? It just seems like another UI stuck on top of Gstreamer, except with the additional bloat of Mono. Maybe I'm an idiot, but I still can't figure out why programs like Banshee, Rhythmbox, Amarok, Juk, et al, are considered to be so great. To me, they all seem slow and clunky and non-intuitive. I also never have a few weeks of unbroken time to sit down and listen to 1000 MP3s, so I don't see the point of the huge playlist managers - use XMMS or Beep and get a life.

#

Re:Why?

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on February 23, 2006 03:54 AM
Well, maybe because some people like me have 50 GB of music and don't want to search directories for files and add them to a playlist every time they want to listen some music.
These players you mentioned have rating, sorting and browsing capabilities, which let me hit a shuffle button and hear that music I like most, or, if I'm in a 80's mood, order my music database by date and play that greasy songs that make my day =P
But I agree with you that we must get a life<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;)

#

Re:Why?

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on February 24, 2006 07:52 PM
In fact if you feed xmms with a 50GB directory containing music it will be much faster than for example r.box. It will not try to make 10k categories of that music (that will anyway not work as the id3 tags are usually garbaged with other data)
If I want in xmms to jump to a file that contains "xyz" in it's name, in it's id3 tags or in int's path I just press "j" and type xyz. Done. Try doing the same thing in the other players.

#

Re:Why?

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on February 23, 2006 08:57 PM
The problem with XMMS is that it doesn't use the normal GUI of your desktop, so IT is unintuitive. No one wants two have two cars with completely different controls.

Personally, I also prefer an iTunes/Amarok/Rhythmbox interface. I find that MUCH more intuitive, and much easier to manage and play music with. I agree though on Mono etc; it's completely insane to build a music player in mono, unless that's what the whole desktop uses as it's direct API layer. Otherwise, it's just bloat.

#

xmms interface

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on February 24, 2006 12:05 AM
Actually, you can, at least on Red Hat/Fedora
boxes, use the default desktop look, rather than
xmms's theme.

#

Re:Why?

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on February 23, 2006 11:20 PM
People like me - who listen to music at work all day long - prefer systems like Amarok which can continusly play the 45GB of MP3/OGG files on my system.

#

Re:Why?

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on February 25, 2006 12:32 AM
"I also never have a few weeks of unbroken time to sit down and listen to 1000 MP3s, so I don't see the point of the huge playlist managers - use XMMS or Beep and get a life."

Ah, that's where you're misinformed. The advantage of a playlist/media library is that is finds, and parses all your music for you, abling you to quickly access it, and thus cutting the time used.

Whereas with XMMS and Beep, you have to open the open dialog, go to wherever you store your music, and if you have a lot of music, this can take a while to load, and takes a while to search through the folders, or even longer if you don't have them sorted into folders... then add them to the playlist...
And if you don't even use a playlist, you're wasting even more time by repeatedly loading odd tracks in.

#

Re:Why?

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on February 25, 2006 03:13 AM
also, xmms doesn't sync to an ipod last i checked.

#

Re:Why?

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on October 31, 2006 09:27 AM
Rhythmox/Banshee neither. You can only read files from an iPod, to sync you have to use gtkpod (unfortunately).

#

Re:Why?

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on March 12, 2006 02:54 AM
Moron.

#

Amarok exist

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on February 23, 2006 12:59 AM
God, nobody has tried amarok? I'm a gnome user and even if amarok is a kde progarm and it uses a different them than gnome it's by far the best audio player I've ever seen, including banshee....

#

amaroK is buggy as hell

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on February 24, 2006 04:42 PM
almost every manual interaction leads to a crash, and the "UI", well, is a perfect example how NOT to make a userfriendly application.

#

Re:amaroK is buggy as hell

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on February 25, 2006 09:47 AM
And you Sir are clearly a troll!<nobr> <wbr></nobr>;-)

#

Re:Amarok exist

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on February 27, 2006 03:13 PM
Don't like qt based application<nobr> <wbr></nobr>... The style is quite different from the Gnome environment. So, it may be a good choice for users under KDE, but not under Gnome.

#

Re:Amarok exist

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on February 28, 2006 06:17 AM
Well, does it make much sense since you have klearlooks QT theme and since amarok sits in notification are most of the time?<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)

#

Re:Amarok exist

Posted by: Administrator on February 23, 2006 03:18 AM
I agree.
Id also like to add that Banshee needs an EQ!!!

#

Yet another iTunes clone...

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on February 23, 2006 03:29 AM
After the initial years of music players looking just about anything (from the ugly first Windows' media player to "real" hi-fi equipment), now everyone seems to agree that the iTunes way is THE way to go.

Excuse me while I rant. No! iTunes and clones (like Banshee) are WAY cluttered to me. My guess is that somewhere along the way, some people will get tired of these kind of interfaces. Too big, too bulky, not really THAT powerful. The Winamp paradigm usually works right for me, along with a SEPARATE, power-user oriented library manager (in the Windows world, check The Godfather at <a href="http://users.otenet.gr/~jtcliper/tgf/),l" title="otenet.gr">http://users.otenet.gr/~jtcliper/tgf/),l</a otenet.gr> which is, among other things, scriptable.

For a quite different approach, check out <a href="http://www.giantdisc.org./" title="www.giantdisc.org">http://www.giantdisc.org./</a www.giantdisc.org> I know this is something completely different, but after a while of being fed with the "iPod is the way to go" craze, I find that the interface for this project is way more advanced that iPod's approach.

Anyway, I dislike bulky, non-flexible song managers like these, and prefer something more flexible. Hope XMMS2 is here soon.

#

Intuitive?

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on February 23, 2006 04:43 AM
I gave up trying to figure out how to randomize the files in Banshee. Is it even possible? I'm sticking with XMMS. Until I get alsaplayer running again, that is. (Everyone loves that 3-D frequency domain display.)

#

mpd has been great for me

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on February 23, 2006 05:54 AM
mpd is a cool program. It runs as a daemon, with various user interfaces that talk to it.

#

Re:mpd has been great for me

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on February 25, 2006 01:38 AM
agreed. mpd is the best, I have it running on a computer hidden behind the stero cabinet. I control it from whatever computer I'm using at the time. gmpc can control it from your linux desktop, got another program on the mac to control it as well.

Can control it from the command line, or from the webserver running on the same box. Music never stops.

#

other players besides xmms[1]

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on February 23, 2006 06:07 AM
For those still using xmms, please checkout xmms2/bmp/bmpx/mpd/armarok/banshee, these are the future media players. Also what gives with only focusing on Banshee, and not an overview of the current media player stock?

#

Re:Amarok exist

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on February 23, 2006 07:09 AM
Why? Buy proper speakers instead...

#

Re:Amarok exist

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on February 23, 2006 03:25 PM
The reason users of Amarok prefer it over other Linux audio players such as Banshee is for several reasons. Some of those reasons are it's wider audio codec support, streaming radio, sync with MP3 players such as from iRiver including Apple's iPod, download album covers and lyrics, drag & drop tracks, offers users a familiar UI that compares with iTunes, etc.

<a href="http://amarok.kde.org/" title="kde.org">http://amarok.kde.org/</a kde.org>

#

Re:Amarok exist

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on March 01, 2006 12:34 AM
Wider audio codec support? Gstreamer is the default backend for banshee, rhythmbox and amarok, so I don't see which formats you can use in amarok and not in rhythmbox/banshee.

#

Re:Amarok exist

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on February 24, 2006 12:05 AM
Rubbish! If someone prefers a different tone to the engineer of a given track, they should be able to change it to their tastes.

#

amaroK

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on February 23, 2006 02:03 PM
the best one for me is amaroK. Based on Gstreamer, has support for various data bases, fast search, dynamic mode, radio. At the moment I am using it on two accounts simultaniously on one desktop - ubuntu - 2 users under GDM

#

Re:amaroK

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on February 23, 2006 07:57 PM
I agree, amaroK is great! I've been using gnome for years now, but amaroK might be a reason to make me switch back to KDE. Actually, it's not really amaroK itself, but more kparts, because it's no problem to run amaroK under gnome. I can't wait to see what happens when they finally integrate Wikipedia well in kparts. Does gnome have anything like kparts?

#

Re:amaroK

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on February 27, 2006 03:24 PM
Amarok is simply the best.

----Jealous windows user---

#

Re:amaroK

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on March 01, 2006 12:38 AM
Eh... The argument about gstreamer, banshee and rhythmbox are based on gstreamer as well.

#

What a joke

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on February 23, 2006 02:29 PM
What a disappointment. I went running to try it after reading the article just to realize it's sooooo far from being competition to amaroK.
amarok is so much faster, more polished and featureful than banshee that it's sad.
Now I understand what the guy meant with "wails"...

#

My favorite player : gmusicbrowser

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on February 24, 2006 12:19 AM
I found this player that is really nice for huge collection, really fast, very original, with a number of "skins" (called "layouts"). Although it doesn't have support for streams or ipods.

<a href="http://squentin.free.fr/gmusicbrowser/gmusicbrowser.html" title="squentin.free.fr">http://squentin.free.fr/gmusicbrowser/gmusicbrows<nobr>e<wbr></nobr> r.html</a squentin.free.fr>

#

Banshee the default player in SUSE?

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on February 24, 2006 12:21 AM
Novell really is dropping KDE in favour of Gnome. Even in this case when the KDE alternative clearly is better. SUSE is becomming a falling star on the KDE sky, while Kubuntu is rising.

#

im a gnome user

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on February 24, 2006 01:38 PM
but i use amarok. go figure try it<nobr> <wbr></nobr>:)

#

Simple random auto-fill for MP3 player?

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on February 24, 2006 05:47 PM
What I'd like to see is a program that lets me select the capacity of my MP3 player, then select the directory tree containing my entire MP3 collection, then allow me to click on "Fill MP3 Player" and have it randomly select enough songs from my collection to fill my MP3 player.

Very simple user interface, it could be integrated into a larger program, but might be best as a simple utility.

#

I tried it and then went back to Rhythmbox

Posted by: Administrator on February 23, 2006 08:15 AM
Banshee is missing a lot of functionality that Rhythmbox has. I couldn't figure out how to play just a specific album without making a playlist for it. I also use Rhythmbox's podcasting capabilities .

#

This story has been archived. Comments can no longer be posted.



 
Tableless layout Validate XHTML 1.0 Strict Validate CSS Powered by Xaraya