Linux.com

Feature

Portrait: Raph Levien, font-designer and free software contributor

By Bruce Byfield on December 20, 2006 (8:00:00 AM)

Share    Print    Comments   

Raph Levien sees himself as one of a small but growing collection of people working to reconcile the free software and typographic communities. Most font designers, Levien says, "have a real suspicion of the free software ethic. It's only in the last year or two that we've seen some bridges being built between these two worlds."

Levien himself moves comfortably in both worlds. On the one hand, Levien has been contributing to free software projects ever since 1994, when his interest in the cypherpunk movement drew him into the early development of the GIMP at the University of California at Berkeley. Since then, he has contributed to a number of projects, including libart, Gtk+, and Gill and Gdome for the GNOME project. Many of his contributions are to projects that center on design. In addition, Levien is employed by Ghostscript and holds several patents, including one for Even Toned Screening, a set of halftoning algorithms for inkjet printers. He is also working on a doctoral dissertation involving improved font rendering that he expects to result in another patent and the release of more free software tools.

On the other hand, Levien developed a love of typography at an early age. His father, Jack R. Levien, is well-known as a producer of miniature books, and Levien claims that he learned his alphabet from his father's collection of font specimens -- "A for Albertus, B for Bodoni," he jokes. By the age of 15 he was designing his first fonts for dot-matrix printers, efforts that he now calls primitive.

With this mixed background, Levien dismisses the idea of any division between the collaborative work-methods in free software and font design, which to many appears to be a solo act of creativity. "To me, there's a lot of commonality," he says. "There's a lot of creativity in designing free software, and that's what appeals to me most." Like many free software contributors, however, he expresses a preference for small, specific projects, rather than what he considers the large corporation style of "code dumps" like OpenOffice.org.

Levien's more recent typefaces are licensed under the SIL Open Font License, at least partly to show his support for the growing community that he calls the free font movement. Many of these designs, such as Museums Caps, LeBe, and ATF Bodoni, are developed from tracings of humanist designs -- that is, either classic typefaces from the Renaissance or ones inspired by them in the last century. "I've always been fascinated by the achievements of the classical font designers," he says, particularly when he compares the design tools available to them with modern digital ones.

Levien's fonts are available in a FontForge format, from which users can make their own modifications or generate their own PostScript or TrueType exports for use. However, Levien considers them works in progress. He expresses dissatisfaction with their spacing, and some of them lack numerals, or in the case of LeBe Book, even basic punctuation such as the semicolon. Yet, despite their unfinished state, many of them are suitable for body text or basic book design.

Just now, Levien is devoting most of his efforts to Inconsolata, which he intends as a high-quality monospaced font. Although he prefers not to criticize individual typefaces, Levien says that "what exists in commercial and free monospaced fonts is very poor compared with what is possible." While development is ongoing, he describes Inconsolata as "on the cusp of a full release," and hopes to see it included soon in the major GNU/Linux distributions.

Contributions from others have been "very modest so far," but Levien remains optimistic about free font development. "I just got a collection of glyphs for Inconsolata a couple of days ago," he says. "One of the things I'm expecting is to get glyphs that fill out the international character ranges, because it seems just about every font that goes into widespread use and has a license that encourages free contributions has that happen. If the font is decent, it's probably going to get a pretty complete Cyrillic and Greek and even Vietnamese complement."

In fact, Levien describes support for a broad range of Unicode tables as typical of the free font movement. "One question," he says, "That's worth asking is: If you do free software, what can you achieve that you really can't achieve using the proprietary model? And one of those is having full-resource indy designers develop these character sets.

"Another thing I'm hopeful about is people taking the fonts apart and putting them back together in new ways. For the most part, proprietary fonts don't allow you to do that in their license. We haven't really seen much of that yet."

Levien admits that the free font movement is not entirely new. In particular, he acknowledges the work that Donald E. Knuth has done in encouraging the development of fonts for use with Tex. The trouble is, Levien suggests, Knuth's efforts, through nobody's fault, suffered from a lack of infrastructure. Supporters of Tex had to invent their own font-rendering technology, but their efforts were at least partly negated by the rise of the PostScript standard. Now, however, Levien believes that, although the development of free fonts is in its earliest days, free software has the standardized infrastructure in place to move reliably beyond utility and produce high-quality typefaces.

"If free software is going to grow to the next stage, you have to pay attention to quality," Levien says. "I'm kind of excited to be part of something like that."

Bruce Byfield is a computer journalist who writes regularly for NewsForge, Linux.com, and IT Manager's Journal.

Our new Portraits series seeks to profile individuals who are doing interesting things with free and open source software. If you know of someone you'd like to read about, please let us know.

Bruce Byfield is a computer journalist who writes regularly for Linux.com.

Share    Print    Comments   

Comments

on Portrait: Raph Levien, font-designer and free software contributor

Note: Comments are owned by the poster. We are not responsible for their content.

the Unifont fontguide

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on December 29, 2006 01:55 AM
On the subject of free/open fonts, the
<a href="http://unifont.org/fontguide/" title="unifont.org"> </a unifont.org><a href="http://unifont.org/fontguide/" title="unifont.org">http://unifont.org/fontguide/</a unifont.org> is a must. Well worth checking out.

#

It's pronounced "Rafe"

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on December 21, 2006 06:08 AM
... but it's spelled "Linux".

Wait, wrong joke.

Seriously though, he goes by "Raph".

- KMSelf

#

Most used fonts

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on December 21, 2006 07:44 AM
I think the most used fonts are;
* Verdana, Arial and Helvetica.
But Fixedsys font and Terminal font is cool too.

A lot of fonts such as Impact, etc sucks.

Maybe someone like Wingdings or Webdings or whatever.

#

Popular free fonts

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on December 21, 2006 07:50 AM
Gentium
* <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gentium" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gentium</a wikipedia.org>

Bitstream Vera
* <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bitstream_Vera" title="wikipedia.org">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bitstream_Vera</a wikipedia.org>

#

Beautiful Fonts

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on December 21, 2006 12:44 PM
I have been working in the prepress industry for the last 11+ years. These fonts are among the finest available and one day they can surely stand next to the one developed by Adobe and Lynotype.

It is an honer and great gift to the open source community that there are people putting all their talent and efford in creating them.

I wish there were more articles like this.

Thank you.

#

Cool article.

Posted by: Anonymous Coward on December 22, 2006 02:46 AM
Very important from a standards POV.

It would be nice to replace the rather inconvenient proprietary versions (Arial, Tahoma etc.) with non-encumbered free versions which could be made widely available.

This is important for the success of ODF, e.g.

#

Don't forget ...

Posted by: Administrator on December 21, 2006 07:57 PM
... Linux Libertine font which I love very much

<a href="http://sourceforge.net/projects/linuxlibertine" title="sourceforge.net">http://sourceforge.net/projects/linuxlibertine</a sourceforge.net>

#

Some followup

Posted by: Administrator on December 23, 2006 08:44 AM
Thanks, Bruce, for the nice writeup. And yes, as Karsten points out, my name is spelled "Raph." Just don't get me started on how to pronounce <a href="http://ghilbert.org/" title="ghilbert.org">ghilbert</a ghilbert.org>.

There's quite a bit more discussion over at <a href="http://typophile.com/node/30175" title="typophile.com">typophile</a typophile.com>, from font designers both who are and are not suspicious of the free software "ethic."

A couple of factual points. Museum Caps is not, in fact, released, as it is based on Centaur, and so I will only release it in cooperation with Monotype. We've had some talks about that, but no progress in the past few months. Also, my PhD thesis relates to curves in general, with type design a strong motivating application. I've done some work on font rendering too, but this is entirely different.

I'd like to clarify my argument about international character sets. With few exceptions, independent type designers don't have the resources or the financial incentives to make fonts with broad Unicode coverage. Most such proprietary fonts are sponsored by large corporations, in fact, while most indie fonts have just the European complement. But free fonts are very much the exception to this rule. I fully expect that we'll see a bunch of free fonts that are both independent and wide. The Bitstream Vera and the fonts derived from the URW release (the freefont project) hint at this potential, but they started life as corporate-sponsored, so I'm not sure they really count.

One problem which I think the free font movement might be able to solve is the provision of good web fonts. It's technologically difficult to put up typographically rich content on the web without also giving the fonts away, so we see site after site that uses the Microsoft "core fonts" because of the high probability they're available on the user's browser. See this <a href="http://typophile.com/node/19502" title="typophile.com">excellent typophile thread</a typophile.com> for a discussion of the issues involved. But if there are good free fonts, much of the tension goes away. Perhaps the ability to fill this need will motivate more free fonts, and maybe font designers can even get paid reasonable money for their work.

Finally, I'd like to give a shoutout to many of the other people who make up the "free font movement," including <a href="http://tug2000.tug.org/interviews/interview-files/karl-berry.html" title="tug.org">Karl Berry</a tug.org> of the TeX Users Group, <a href="http://www.openfontlibrary.org/wiki/index.php/Dave_Crossland" title="openfontlibrary.org">Dave Crossland</a openfontlibrary.org> and the rest of the crew at <a href="http://www.openfontlibrary.org/wiki/index.php/Main_Page" title="openfontlibrary.org">Open Font Library</a openfontlibrary.org>, and all the others who have contributed font designs, code, criticisms, and encouragement. It wouldn't be much of a movement if it were just me.

#

This story has been archived. Comments can no longer be posted.



 
Tableless layout Validate XHTML 1.0 Strict Validate CSS Powered by Xaraya