|
Author |
Message |
|
|
Posted Mar 05, 2008 at 4:57:13 AM
Subject: Debian Vs Ubuntu
Hai,
Debian Or Ubuntu Which one you prefer and Why ?
|
rectec794613
Joined Jan 20, 2008 Posts: 29
Other Topics
|
Posted:
Mar 08, 2008 2:02:04 AM
Subject: Debian Vs Ubuntu
Well, I haven't used Debian but I can tell you this: I have Ubuntu
Some things I've learned about Ubuntu so far:
1. It's fully customizable
2. You can run it off a CD
3. Downloadable Wallpapers, themes, Desktop Environments (DEs), and loaded with cool Screensavers.
4. So secure it dosn't even need a FireWall.
5. Very cool eyecandy visual effects
6. Comes with FireFox
There's probably hundreds of cool features that I'm too lazy to list.
BUT if you want to run a only 90 meg machine off ur USB drive, Damn Small Linux (DSL) is your choice!
|
Shashank Sharma
Joined Jan 01, 1970 Posts: 1361
Location:New Delhi, India
Other Topics
|
Posted:
Mar 12, 2008 9:48:41 AM
Subject: Debian Vs Ubuntu
Ubuntu is based on Debian so quite a few things are the same. To new users I wouldn't recommend Debian but I would rather suggest Ubuntu.
The points as listed by rectec hold true for Debian as well as all other Linux distributions, except 2, because not all distributions are live CDs.
[Modified by: Shashank Sharma on March 14, 2008 01:29 PM]
Coauthor of Beginning Fedora: From Novice to Professional published by Apress.
Please follow the Forum Guidelines
|
rectec794613
Joined Jan 20, 2008 Posts: 29
Other Topics
|
Posted:
Mar 13, 2008 1:53:39 AM
Subject: Debian Vs Ubuntu
^_^ I said Ubuntu runs off live CDs, Shashank Sharma.
BTW, if you don't have alot of RAM, slow Internet Connection, etc. You should get Damn Small Linux
(DSL)
|
rectec794613
Joined Jan 20, 2008 Posts: 29
Other Topics
|
Posted:
Mar 13, 2008 1:55:53 AM
Subject: Debian Vs Ubuntu
But yeah, Ubuntu is based on Debian. I learned it on Ubuntu.com.
|
Shashank Sharma
Joined Jan 01, 1970 Posts: 1361
Location:New Delhi, India
Other Topics
|
Posted:
Mar 14, 2008 7:58:13 AM
Subject: Debian Vs Ubuntu
rectec, I never questioned your claim :) I did err in my post, in that I wanted to say: "except 2, because not all distributions are live CDs." I'm gonna correct that now.
And if I wasn't clear enough, I just wanted to say that all your points hold true for all Linux distributions, not just Ubuntu, except 2, because while Ubuntu can run off a live CD, other distributions can't.
Cheers!
Coauthor of Beginning Fedora: From Novice to Professional published by Apress.
Please follow the Forum Guidelines
|
dl
Joined May 17, 2008 Posts: 7
Other Topics
|
Posted:
May 18, 2008 5:31:25 AM
Subject: Debian Vs Ubuntu
let ubuntu is the best linux, so which one is the next? thanks.
|
Ante
Joined Mar 28, 2008 Posts: 115
Other Topics
|
Posted:
May 18, 2008 4:46:48 PM
Subject: Debian Vs Ubuntu
I really don't want to start something bad here rectec, but I don't know whether what you said on your first post is funny or laughable.
we've established the fact that ubuntu is based off Debian, it's safe to say that 99% of what you can do with Ubuntu is possible with Debian
- Quote:
Well, I haven't used Debian but I can tell you this: I have Ubuntu
Some things I've learned about Ubuntu so far:
1. It's fully customizable
2. You can run it off a CD
3. Downloadable Wallpapers, themes, Desktop Environments (DEs), and loaded with cool Screensavers.
4. So secure it dosn't even need a FireWall.
5. Very cool eyecandy visual effects
6. Comes with FireFox
- Quote:
There's probably hundreds of cool features that I'm too lazy to list.
- Quote:
BUT if you want to run a only 90 meg machine off ur USB drive, Damn Small Linux (DSL) is your choice!
1. so is Debian!
2. so can debian!
http://www.debian.org/CD/faq/#live-cd
http://live.debian.net/
3. you can do that with Debian too! OMG you can put a wallpaper in Debian?! As for other packages, Ubuntu's main way of doing it is through apt get or whateve, this sucks for people like me who doesn't a (decent) internet connection to the PC with Ubuntu. Debian has like umpteen extension CDs with most of the packages. Not to worry, you can use those CDs on Ubuntu as well...
4. you don't have to, but Ubuntu does have Uncomplicated Firewall out of the box
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuFirewall
5. Eyecandy/visual effects with Ubuntu is CompizFusion, surprisingly it's also in Debian's repo (http://packages.debian.org/compiz) which by the way is also available for every other distro out there...
6. Did you just base your choice of OS on FireFox? Now I like FireFox, but I question why the heck Canonical put a beta program, albeit works 99%, on a LTS OS.
I'm not saying that Ubuntu is the best distro out there either, but is polished up much better than Debian and would recommend Ubuntu over Debian.
On that note, I'd recommend Mint over Ubuntu
|
proopnarine
Joined Apr 03, 2008 Posts: 306
Location:San Francisco
Other Topics
|
Posted:
May 18, 2008 9:44:10 PM
Subject: Debian Vs Ubuntu
I'll put in a plug here for Fedora. Very easy installation, bleeding edge application versions (in many cases), and very secure. I am also a big user of Ubuntu (Kubuntu actually), but there are some things that I find annoying (the approach to root user, automatic configuration options that are a nightmare to track down, etc.), that are simply not annoyances with Debian. Also, I question the statement that Ubuntu is secure enough out of the box to run without a firewall. It definitely depends on the purpose of the machine and if you plan to run any internet serving applications!!!
Take the red pill
www.calacademy.org/blogs
|
Moofs
Joined May 25, 2008 Posts: 28
Location:Westminster,Colorado USA
Other Topics
|
Posted:
May 26, 2008 7:31:20 PM
Subject: Debian Vs Ubuntu
teh 'Buntu and debian are from the same.however somewhere and i dont know where,they split.once have either up and running,you will see differences between the two.
for new users, i'd go ubuntu.if experienced,either would be a good choice.knoppix too (came from debian) would be a good choice.slax too,and it came from knoppix.
Welcome to the forums!!! http://ubuntuforums.org/
|
proopnarine
Joined Apr 03, 2008 Posts: 306
Location:San Francisco
Other Topics
|
Posted:
May 27, 2008 5:01:31 AM
Subject: Debian Vs Ubuntu
There has not been a split between Debian and Ubuntu. Most Ubuntu packages are still derived from Debian's stable and unstable development branches, and Ubuntu's packaging system is essentially the same as Debian's. Ubuntu really shines I think in its ease of installation and use for newcomers, its ease of package maintenance, and its hardware support.
Once you've learned a bit about Linux, I would suggest giving Debian a try though. It's a great project.
Take the red pill
www.calacademy.org/blogs
|
Moofs
Joined May 25, 2008 Posts: 28
Location:Westminster,Colorado USA
Other Topics
|
Posted:
May 27, 2008 9:18:40 PM
Subject: Debian Vs Ubuntu
- Quote proopnarine:
There has not been a split between Debian and Ubuntu. Most Ubuntu packages are still derived from Debian's stable and unstable development branches, and Ubuntu's packaging system is essentially the same as Debian's. Ubuntu really shines I think in its ease of installation and use for newcomers, its ease of package maintenance, and its hardware support.
Once you've learned a bit about Linux, I would suggest giving Debian a try though. It's a great project.
very well said :)
Welcome to the forums!!! http://ubuntuforums.org/
|