There are developments in the SCO v. IBM case. IBM is pressing forward aggressively with its Motion to Compel Discovery, despite SCO giving it
Supplemental Answers to IBM’s discovery requests, which IBM characterizes as inadequate.
Supplemental Answers to IBM’s discovery requests, which IBM characterizes as inadequate.
IBM filed in Utah, on November 3, a Reply Memorandum in Support of its Motion to Compel Disovery (available at http://www.groklaw.net/pdf/IBM-63.pdf)
and an addendum to it. It isn’t available yet on the free Pacer list, but it should be soon. Then on the 4th, IBM filed a certificate of service
regarding its Responses and Objections to SCO’s First Request for Admissions. That is not yet available online.
Link: groklaw.net
