Guest writes “Basically, this article lists various aspects of the study done by Security Innovation and points out shortfalls that they didn’t consider…such as why they didn’t use RHEL 3 AS instead of ES and why they didn’t use Red Hat Database 2.1 instead of MySQL for their comparisons (and the fact that MySQL vulnerabilities counted against the OS). It also takes a look at the background of the authors of the “report””
Link: linuxblog.sytes.net
Category:
- Security
