Author: JT Smith
June 6th. The Hague Convention defines a set of provisions for the
execution of foreign judgements in the event of international
disputes. Current drafts include industrial property and
intellectual
property within the potential scope of the proposed Convention. If
the
current draft were approved, the Hague Convention would eventually
allow:
1.to enforce US Internet patents in EU;
      2.to enforce non-EU laws in order to censor EU Internet web
sites.
An EU company publishing on a server located in the EU a web service
   which provides Internet airplane reservation services worldwide
could
   be sued in the US by PriceLine for infringement on patent 5,794,207.
A
   US judge could decide that this EU company should block access to
its
   service to US citizens unless it gets a license from PriceLine.
Under
   the current draft of the Hague Convention, such a  judgement would
be
   enforceable in the EU.
   A researcher who publishes on a EU server an article on the
weaknesses
   of encryption techniques used in the media industry (ex. CSS, SDMI,
   etc.) could be sued in the US for infringing the Digital Millenium
   Copyright Act. A US judge could decide that this EU researcher
should
   block access to its research article to all US citizens. Under the
   current draft of the Hague Convention, such a  judgement would be
   enforceable in the EU.
   Because all known techniques to block access to a category of
   citizens, people, country or IP adresses can be easily circumvented
   through “email tunneling” (a technique which consists in
encapsulating
   any Internet protocol into encrypted email messages), the only two
   ways of enforcing foreign judgements which entail blocking access to
a
   server require either to close EU services or contents which
infringe
   on foreign laws, thus creating the conditions for global censorship,
   or to prohibit encryption and deny privacy on the Internet.
   Members of the Hague Conference include all EU countries as well as
   Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Bulgaria, Canada, Chile, China,
Croatia,
   Cyprus, Czech Republic, Egypt, Estonia, Former Yugoslav Republic of
   Macedonia, Georgia,  Hungary,  Israel, Japan, Republic of Korea,
   Latvia, Malta, Mexico, Monaco, Morocco, Peru, Poland,  Romania,
   Slovakia, Slovenia, Suriname, Switzerland, Turkey, the United States
   of America, Uruguay and Venezuela.
   Some of these countries are well known for their aggressive software
   patent practices or their restrictive laws on free speech. In
   particular, EuroLinux feels very concerned by the eventual
   enforceability of foreign Internet & software patents in Europe.
   EuroLinux urges members of the Hague Conference to put on hold
current
   plans to extend the execution of foreign judgements in the fields of
   industrial and intellectual property until their effects on software
   and the Internet have been carefully assessed.
References
   CPT’s Page on the Hague Conference on Private International Law’s –
   http://www.cptech.org/ecom/jurisdiction/hague.html
   Hague Conference on Private International Law –
   http://www.hcch.net/f/conventions/draft36f.html
   Intellectual Property Draft –
   http://www.cptech.org/ecom/jurisdiction/IPWorkgroup3.pdf
   EuroLinux petition for a Software Patent Free Europe –
   http://petition.EuroLinux.org/
   PriceLine patent already in dispute –
   http://www.usatoday.com/life/cyber/tech/ctg949.htm
   DeCSS Author Arrested –
   http://www.slashdot.org/articles/00/01/25/0827258.shtml
   Copyright Thugs – The SDMI, the RIAA and industry lawyers better get
   something straight: preventing piracy doesn’t mean you can punish
   researchers –
   http://www.thestandard.com/article/0,1902,24208,00.html
   French hackers break SDMI, publish results –
   http://www.linuxsecurity.com/articles/hackscracks_article-2370.html
About EuroLinux – www.EuroLinux.org
   The EuroLinux Alliance for a Free Information Infrastructure is an
   open coalition of commercial companies and non-profit associations
   united to promote and protect a vigourous European Software Culture
   based on Open Standards, Open Competition, Linux and Open Source
   Software. Companies members or supporters of EuroLinux develop or
sell
   software under free, semi-free and non-free licenses for operating
   systems such as Linux, MacOS or Windows.
   The EuroLinux Alliance launched on 2000-06-15 an electronic petition
   to protect software innovation in Europe. The EuroLinux petition has
   received so far massive support from more than 70.000 European
   citizens, 2000 corporate managers and 200 companies.
   The EuroLinux Alliance has co-organised in 1999, together with the
   French Embassy in Japan, the first Europe-Japan conference on Linux
   and Free Software. The EuroLinux Alliance is at the initiative of
the
   www.freepatents.org web site to promote and protect innovation and
   competition in the European IT industry.
Permanent URL for this PR
   http://petition.EuroLinux.org/pr/pr11.html
   http://petition.EuroLinux.org/pr/pr11.pdf
Legalese
   Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds.
   All other trademarks and copyrights are owned by their respective
   companies.
 
                
