Author: JT Smith
Category:
- Open Source
Author: JT Smith
Category:
Author: JT Smith
The server, which had been rebooting randomly late Sunday, refused to boot up about 6 a.m. Monday, said Jamie McCarthy, head programmer at NewsForge. “It was stuck on fsck, waiting for someone at the console
to tell it what to do,” he said.
Server administrators pressed a quad-Xeon 550 into service, and McCarthy spent most of the day copying files over and configuring it — a complete Slashcode installation.
McCarthy wasn’t sure NewsForge needed the power and size of a Type III server, but it does have multiple backup power supplies. “But it turned out that it helped us again already,” he said. “Around 3 p.m., we had a hell of a scare when one of the hard drives apparently flaked out. But since it’s parity RAID, and since the others are working fine, nothing was corrupted.”
NewsForge began posting news again shortly after 6 p.m. Monday, and our service should be back to normal. We’ll try to catch up on all the Open Source news that happened while we were down.
As always, we welcome readers’ input on everything we do at NewsForge. We apologize for the down time Monday.
— Grant Gross, managing editor
grant@newsforge.com
Author: JT Smith
Category:
Author: JT Smith
Category:
Author: JT Smith
SANTA CLARA, Calif., Oct. 16, 2000–Lutris Technologies Inc., the
leading
Open Source enterprise software and services company, today announced
Lutris
Enhydra Wireless, the latest product in Lutris’ family of certified and
supported Open Source Enhydra Java/XML application servers. Lutris
Enhydra
Wireless offers developers, systems
integrators and corporate IT departments the ability to develop a
single
internet application that delivers content to any device, in any
geographic
region, by supporting every major wireless protocol: i-mode, WAP, J2ME,
and
VoiceXML.
“Supporting the protocols that make targeting every device possible is
only
the beginning. What Lutris Enhydra Wireless delivers to our customers
and
ISV partners is the ability to seamlessly deploy one application that
is
accessible by all of their customers, regardless of their Internet
device or
geographic location,” said Yancy Lind, president and CEO, Lutris
Technologies. “Through the power of Open Source, Lutris Enhydra
Wireless
benefits from a worldwide community of developers with local wireless
expertise, and thus guarantees the ability to deploy global
applications.”
Lutris Enhydra Wireless provides developers with the first development
platform specifically designed to deliver content to wireless and wired
devices including phones, PDAs, handheld computers, desktops and
laptops.
Further, unlike other application servers that require a unique
code-base
for each device that will access the application, Lutris Enhydra
Wireless
leverages Enhydra XMLC, a technology developed by Lutris, to
effectively
separate the business logic from the presentation layer, enabling a
single
application to deliver content to any number of devices. This
“one-to-many”
approach significantly decreases time to market and dramatically
improves
application manageability. Additionally, this extensible XML
architecture
ensures that future wireless devices that depend on new presentation
technologies can be easily added to the application with minimal
impact.
“Wireless technology adds yet another level of complexity to the
deployment
environments that today’s application developers must support. A lack
of
standards means that applications targeted at wireless devices must
support
multiple protocols. To ease the burden on the developer Lutris is
taking
their support one step further, beyond just supporting all the
available
wireless protocols,” said Tracy Corbo, senior analyst, The Hurwitz
Group.
“In addition, Lutris is using XML to separate business and presentation
logic making their wireless applications more flexible. This enables
developers to focus on writing applications without worrying about the
wireless protocol du jour.”
To ensure that developers using Lutris Enhydra Wireless have the
technologies needed to meet the new demands of wireless development,
and to
address the absence of a global wireless standard, Lutris has included
support for a variety of leading presentation protocols. These include
HTML,
WML, cHTML, XHTML-Basic, VoiceXML and the new J2ME/MIDp protocols
required
for the emerging Java phones. In addition, Lutris has bundled emulators
for
many of the leading mobile phones, empowering developers to see how the
applications they have built will appear on the phone’s screen at run
time.
To aid in development and deployment, the product also includes
PostgresSQL
7, JBuilder Foundation, Forte for Java Community Edition and
comprehensive
wireless sample applications and source code.
Pricing and Availability
Lutris Enhydra Wireless will be generally available in December 2000.
Pricing for the product is still under consideration, and will include
options for selected training and support packages.
About Lutris Technologies
Lutris Technologies, a leading Open Source enterprise software and
services
company, is the original developer and primary sponsor of Enhydra, a
leading
Open Source Internet application server supporting Java, XML, and
wireless
technologies. Lutris offers a full range of support services and
technical
training to Lutris Enhydra customers and provides complete Internet
consulting services, including strategy and development services, to
the
Enhydra community and to Internet-savvy businesses. Clients range from
entrepreneurs and companies launching new Web ventures to Fortune 500
IT
organizations growing their business with an online presence.
Additional
information about Lutris products and services is available at
www.lutris.com.
Lutris and Enhydra are registered trademarks of Lutris Technologies,
Inc.
Java is a trademark of Sun Microsystems, Inc. in the United States and
other
countries. All other trademarks belong to their respective holders.
Author: JT Smith
Category:
Author: JT Smith
Category:
Author: JT Smith
Category:
Author: JT Smith
Author: JT Smith
This is a non-story. Or is it? It seems that according to the press announcement for
the WebMasters 2001 Exposition in London last week, “Microsoft will be providing copies of Visual Studio .NET Beta 2 for all attendees.” And this it did, packaged in a cutsie accordion fold-out pack. However, the press announcement also advised us the
behemoth would “be providing copies of the Linux Migration Guide.”
According to Microsoft, “The Guide contains technical information to aid developers and IT specialists in migrating Linux e-commerce solutions to a Microsoft
web solutions platform.” (While the Guide was apparently never distributed at the conference, it’s online at Microsoft.com.)
And according to the program for the expo, Microsoft had a booth. However, there was no Microsoft booth, nor were there any of the company’s representatives or
spokesmen anywhere in sight, except during the seminars they were conducting. When this reporter contacted one of the company’s offices in the U.K. and
asked to speak to a public relations spokesman, true to form for Microsoft, we were connected to the human resources department.
When the event organizer tried to chase up a Microsoft spokesperson or seminar speaker, he was told the guy couldn’t or wouldn’t talk with me. No need to try
to divine why that might be.
This reporter spent all day trying to track down one of these wondrous publications. They proved to be as elusive as company personnel. The event organizer then informed me the company had apparently decided, after publication of the press announcement, not to distribute “The Guide” and not to take a booth.
So rather than go away empty-handed, our intrepid reporter tracked down a spokesperson from a major Linux distribution company. She agreed to speak on
terms of anonymity.
Anyway, when asked “why Microsoft would want or feel a need to give out a migration guide for Linux to .Net,” she speculated, “Because they realize the Linux market is
growing. They would like to find a way to get some of the Linux market back to Microsoft.”
But, what percentage of Linux users do you think would be crazy enough to be interested in migrating to Microsoft, she was asked. “I’m not aware of any at the moment.”
“None?” I asked. “Not that I’m aware of,” she reiterated.
Finally, I asked, “why do you think Microsoft gave up the idea of distributing The Guide?” To which she responded, “I don’t know. Maybe it’s costing them too
much in marketing budget to send them out to customers.”
“You mean in terms of return of investment,” I suggested.
“I just don’t know,” she demurred.
Category: